CommanderBond.net
  1. Classified Dossier: James Bond's (literary) agent

    By David Winter on 2010-03-24
    This article also appears in the March-April issue of CRIMESPREE Magazine, www.crimespreemag.com.

    The Official Secrets Act has been compromised. MI6 has learned that James Bond 007 had a literary agent who was responsible for bringing most of the famous agent’s printed exploits to the world. The man has been identified as one Peter Janson-Smith, known to the publishing world in the United Kingdom as one of the most reputable, honest, and business-savvy authors’ representatives in the country. Fortunately, CommanderBond.net has obtained the security clearance necessary for an exclusive interview with Janson-Smith.

    Written by Raymond Benson

    When asked how he became a literary agent, Janson-Smith explains that any ex-members of Oxford university serving in the army during World War II were entitled free of charge to have on demobilization the services of an employment appointments board. It was December 1946 and Janson-Smith had just been released from his service as a major—a radar specialist in charge of an anti-aircraft battery that was part of London’s defenses against the Germans.

    “I went to see these nice people and informed them of my wish to work in publishing,” Janson-Smith relates. “Lo and behold, the chap I was talking to looked up something and said, ‘Oh, yes, the Oxford University Press wants someone to take charge of Bible sales in Africa.’ I said, ‘No, thank you very much.’ As there wasn’t much else on offer there, I started to leave; but the man said, ‘Hold on, I just had a letter, it’s somewhere on my desk. Man says he’s a literary agent; I don’t know what that is, but it sounds like something to do with publishing.'” Indeed, the letter was from A. D. Peters, a famous literary agent in England. He was looking for an ex-service man to be his assistant. “So I wrote to A. D. Peters and had an interview. And he took me on! That was in London, and I was paid seven pounds a week.”

    The rest, as they say, is history. It took another ten years, some of them at Curtis Brown, before Janson-Smith struck out on his own as an agent; but once he did, he represented some of Britain’s best known authors, including Ian Fleming, Eric Ambler, Anthony Burgess, and Richard Holmes, the now-famous literary biographer.

    Peter Janson-Smith. Photo by Tim Hawkins

    Janson-Smith was born September 5, 1922, in a little village called Navestock in Essex, which is now more or less overtaken by the sprawl of greater London. His father, Edgar Janson-Smith, was the vicar of the Church of England there, and his mother, Alice Whitney, was from County Wexford in Southern Ireland.

    “The hyphenated name was a result of my father wishing to please his future in-laws,” Janson-Smith says. “When he was born, he was given the name Edgar Janson Smith, with no hyphen. Janson was my father’s mother’s family name and they originally came from Yorkshire. Actually it was I’anson, but it became Janson. At that time there was much more snobbery around, and Smith was not considered a particularly suitable name for a lady. My mother’s family thought, ‘What, she’s going to marry a Smith?’ But then they learnt of the Janson and considered that was rather nice, so my father changed his surname. It was quite easy to do then and from then on he would be known as Janson-Smith; but he didn’t drop Janson as a Christian name, so he actually became Edgar Janson Janson-Smith!”

    When he was around three years old, Janson-Smith’s family moved to Wimborne St. Giles in Dorset, which he describes as a wonderful and beautiful place to spend his childhood years. He was shipped off to Salisbury in Wiltshire at the age of eight to prepatory school. In the old English tradition, unless one lived in London, a child became a boarder, living there for the whole term and going home only for holidays. “We had an extraordinary headmaster who was a canon, a priest of the Church of England, but that didn’t stop him from having some pretty disgusting habits,” Janson-Smith remembers. “He was a sadist and he used to beat the younger boys regularly. He would give us some task to do like learning a poem and give us thirty minutes to do so, and if you didn’t learn it he would beat you. Of course, knowing you would probably be beaten, you couldn’t learn it. This dreadful man used to make us take our trousers down so he could beat us—what he really wanted was to have a good look at young boys’ arses!” Janson-Smith recalls the headmaster’s sharp and sudden end very well. “One of my friends, a contemporary of mine, was the son of a famous New Zealand general. He was one of the boys who had been beaten and he told his father. The general appeared in full uniform, carrying a horsewhip. He called out, ‘Where are you? Out! Out!’ and went into the headmaster’s study. Everyone could hear the whip cracking. Well, the headmaster resigned the next day!” The school was then taken over by the assistant headmaster. “He was a wonderful man,” Janson-Smith says. “He taught me all the basics. I was quite a good Latin scholar, but my main subject of interest was mathematics.”

    Public school was next (Janson-Smith laughs, saying, “A public school means it’s private!”). At the age of fourteen, he went to Sherborne, in Dorset. In a public school there is what is called Sixth Form, which is like American high school. Once there, students are prepared to go to university. “I actually enjoyed the annual examinations,” Janson-Smith recalls. “I liked sitting exams. There were other boys who did better than me during the term, but as I enjoyed exams I didn’t get stressed when I took them, so I did very well at them. I was still there when the war broke out.”

    Janson-Smith went to university in March 1941. While attending St. Edmond Hall at Oxford, he volunteered to join the Royal Artillery, knowing he’d be then allowed to finish his examinations and wouldn’t be called up until then. Janson-Smith obtained what was called a Wartime Degree, allowing him to finish in less than half the normal time, and he didn’t go back after the war. When at Sherborne he switched from science and mathematics to English Language and Literature, he remembered the headmaster of the school (“Another religious madman”) saying, “What’s all this I hear about you wanting to read English at Oxford? English is your own language, boy, you don’t have to study that!” Janson-Smith explained to him that it was the Literature he was learning about, but the man didn’t seem to grasp that—all he could fathom was rugby football.

    At the end of June 1942, Janson-Smith joined the army. He was posted to an officer training unit in Wales and emerged in January of ’43 as a 2nd Lieutenant. He was posted to an anti-aircraft battery in London and became part of the defenses of the city for the duration of the conflict. “I saw no action face-to-face, but quite a lot of bombs were being dropped on us, as well as the V-1s, the flying bombs, you know.” Janson-Smith became the regiment’s adjutant and later a major in charge of a battery. “I became the radar specialist, and it was very interesting. I didn’t understand it completely, it didn’t make me an electronics expert by any means, but I did learn it well enough to operate the equipment and train other people.”

    Raymond Benson, Doug Redenius (VP of the Ian Fleming Foundation), and Peter Janson-Smith in London.

    The gun emplacement was built behind a pub that had been wired up with alarms, so the men could be in the pub and jump into action when needed. The place was run by an elderly couple whose son was away in the army, so they came out of retirement to run the establishment. “One night the whole top of the roof was blown off by a bomb. As soon as the alert was over, we rushed in to see what had happened and found the wonderful old couple there. They had candles on the bar and pints lined up for us. They refused to close the pub. ‘No,’ they said, ‘our boys in the army, they need their pub.’ So they moved in to the basement where all the barrels were so that they could keep the pub open, even though it didn’t have a roof!”

    Janson-Smith didn’t come up for release from the army until the end of 1946. It was then that he became a trainee literary agent for the aforementioned A. D. Peters. His duties were more or less everything to start with, and then he became interested in translation and foreign rights. He eventually specialized in that, although in the very early days as an agent for Peters, Janson-Smith did actually place with Methuen the first book by Bryan Forbes, who later became famous not as a writer but as a film director (Whistle Down the Wind, Séance on a Wet Afternoon).

    The relationship with Peters was a rocky one, mainly due to circumstances. The agent had lost his son only a few days before the end of the war; the young man had been due to inherit the literary agency. “So, of course, every time Peters looked at me, he was thinking, ‘That’s not my son and should be.’ So I could never do anything right and he never taught me anything. But there’s no better way to learn a job than being thrown in at the deep end, and I remember very early on having a very angry Evelyn Waugh on the telephone while Peters was away, and I had to placate him.”

    Janson-Smith stayed with A. D. Peters until then end of 1949 and then joined Curtis Brown as the manager of the foreign language department. “I thoroughly enjoyed that,” he says. “I can’t claim to be fluent in any other language, but I can read French with ease—my spoken French is dreadful—and it’s the other way around with German. Because I was never taught, I just picked it up, so I can get by with German; but I can’t read it easily except for contracts, for which I know all the technical terms and so forth.”

    The young agent started selling Eric Ambler’s translation rights in 1952 and eventually got to know him and other Curtis Brown authors. One day in the summer of 1956, Ambler asked Janson-Smith why he went on working with that “extraordinary man” Spencer Curtis Brown and suggested that Janson-Smith go off on his own. Knowing that one had to have an amazing piece of luck on one’s own for the first two or three years, Janson-Smith answered that he couldn’t afford it. Ambler offered to loan the necessary money and become Janson-Smith’s first star client.

    Over the years, the young agent amassed a respectable stable of authors, including Richard Holmes, who has achieved great success as a biographer of major figures of British and French Romanticism. Gavin Maxwell was a notable author of non-fiction, best known for the international best-seller, Ring of Bright Water. Anthony Burgess was a client for a short time, and in fact, it was Janson-Smith who sold the publication rights to A Clockwork Orange in the early sixties.

    “I selected mostly non-fiction authors, especially historians who wrote for the non-academic reader. For example, for Alan Palmer I negotiated a four-book contract which enabled him to give up his job as a school teacher and become a full time writer. I never acted for an author whose work I did not know well or did not admire.”

    In September of ’56, Janson-Smith received a phone call from Ian Fleming. The erudite Etonian said, “I was at a dinner party recently and I mentioned that my British publishers, who control all rights in my novels except for the American, had not done a very good job selling James Bond internationally.” (At this point there had been three 007 novels published by Jonathan Cape Ltd.) Fleming went on to say that although Bond was very English, he thought the character should have a very international appeal. Apparently Eric Ambler had been at the dinner and told him that Janson-Smith made him more money from foreign language rights than from British ones and made the referral. “So here I am ringing you,” Fleming continued. “Why don’t you come to tea at Kemsley House and let’s have a chat.”

    The meeting with James Bond’s creator went very well. Fleming didn’t at that time want an agent for British rights, as he handled those himself. He also had an American agent just for that market, but he told Janson-Smith, “You can have all my foreign translation rights as of today.”

    Immediately after the meeting, Janson-Smith rang up a Dutch publisher called Abs Bruna and said, “I have an author for you who is going to make you a lot of money.” The agent proposed a contract for the first four Bond titles with good royalties but not much in the way of an advance. The publisher signed up and later bought each novel as it came out—and they’ve never been out of print in The Netherlands since.

    Janson-Smith eventually came to handle Fleming’s dealings with the author’s British publisher beginning with the short story collection For Your Eyes Only (published in 1960) and also took care of serializations in the Daily Express. Fleming had already sold the rights in the first four books for the comic strip published in the newspaper, which began in 1957. “It’s amazing that you’ll find many famous authors at the time, even when they had agents, would go off and sell something on their own. Later on I had a real battle with the Daily Express because he’d sold the serial rights in the early ones for an outright sum. Fortunately they sold the comic book rights, which they certainly did not have, to a Swedish publisher. When I found out, they said, ‘Look, it was a mistake and we hope it doesn’t spoil our relationship. Can we come to some accommodation?’ And I said, ‘Yes, I can convert your illegal sale to a legal one on the basis that it’s clear that what you bought outright is what Ian thought he was selling, and that is the right to print your own strip in the newspaper, and we have to have new terms for the future.”

    Despite working with Fleming for not quite a decade before the author’s untimely death, Janson-Smith never really got to know him well. “Ian kept his acquaintances in compartments. He had a separate agent for his film rights and separate friendships for other activities such as his ownership of the periodical The Book Collector. Our meetings were always at Fleming’s office in Mitre Court, off Fleet Street. I’d sit down and start to tell him what was happening, but in those later years he wasn’t very well and had a short attention span. Usually after about ten minutes, he’d say, ‘Well, that’s all absolutely marvelous, you don’t need to tell me any more. I rely on you absolutely, you do what you think is right and I’ll sign the contract.’ I never socialized with him except at a couple of parties, like the Dr. No premiere party, which was naturally full of film people. I suddenly noticed that there was Ian sitting all by himself—nobody seemed to know who he was! So I sat down and we chatted.”

    Not long before he died, Fleming sold fifty-one per cent of Glidrose, his company to which his copyrights were assigned, to Booker, a conglomerate that later came to own shares in several author estates. Janson-Smith joined the Board of Directors of Glidrose at that point. “Ian’s wife Ann was against the sale,” Janson-Smith said. “She was completely paranoid, she hated Jock Campbell, the head of Booker, for some reason. She was convinced everyone was out to swindle Ian. It’s absolutely untrue. If he hadn’t done this, quite apart from the tax in the U.K., he would have had to pay some vast figure in America. I remember I had to go to the U.S. and talk to their Internal Revenue people and convince them that Glidrose was a legitimate company. Our lawyer and I spoke to the IRS representative, and we let him go on until he contradicted himself. At that point our lawyer told the man that he was ‘out of his cotton-picking mind’ and no more was heard of the IRS claim to tax on the basis that Glidrose was not a genuine company.”

    The Ian Fleming Foundation Board of Directors with Honor Blackman at the opening of the Imperial War Museum's exhibit on Ian Fleming.

    After Ian Fleming’s death in 1964, Wren and Michael Howard of Jonathan Cape became his literary executors. After their deaths, this passed to Glidrose. Along with Janson-Smith, Ian’s brother Peter Fleming was also on the board. Janson-Smith later became the Chairman of Glidrose, which changed its name after some time to Ian Fleming (Glidrose) Publications Ltd. (and “Glidrose” was dropped at the end of the nineties). At some point in the late sixties, it was decided to commission a new James Bond novel and Glidrose approached Kingsley Amis. His 007 novel Colonel Sun was published in 1968 under the pseudonym Robert Markham. “Ann was against it,” Janson-Smith says. “She hated Kingsley Amis, she thought he was one of those kitchen sink lefties who would ruin the image of Bond and so on, which is ironic because Kingsley became an extremely conservative old gentleman, but Peter Fleming persuaded Ann that it should be done. Kingsley was the obvious author because he was known to be a fan (his very complimentary review of Casino Royale in the Times Literary Supplement was probably the first to recognize that an important new author had arrived) and he’d also written The James Bond Dossier, so it was quite clear he understood it all.” There was some speculation over the years that Amis had finished Fleming’s posthumously-published novel The Man with the Golden Gun. “I know that many people say this, but I don’t think he did. The Howards thought the book clearly needed editing and they consulted Kingsley, but it was a completed manuscript, so to say he ‘finished’ it is wrong.”

    The seventies brought no new James Bond novels aside from a couple of oddities. John Pearson wrote a fictional “biography” of the character entitled James Bond—the Authorized Biography of 007, published in 1973. “It’s never been considered part of the series,” Janson-Smith says. “It has been a very underrated book. I think it’s very good. Originally Pearson’s idea was that Bond was dead and so this was a complete biography, a clear indication that he wanted to write a book as if this was it and that was the end of Bond. I put my foot down and said, ‘No, you’ve got to have Bond in retirement being interviewed or reminiscing to a friend.’ Secondly, novelizations of the films The Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker were penned by Christopher Wood in 1977 and 1979, respectively. “We had no hand in that other than we told the film people that we were going to exert our legal right to handle the rights in the books. They chose Christopher Wood because he was one of the screenwriters at the time, and they decided what he would be paid. We got our instructions on that, but from then on, these books-of-the-films became like any other Bond novel—we controlled the publication rights.”

    In 1980, Glidrose hired John Gardner to continue the 007 series. Janson-Smith explains that they had asked H. R. F. Keating, a well-known and highly praised mystery writer, to come up with a short list of authors who might be right to carry on. “It turned out that of them we liked John Gardner’s work, so we sounded him out. We asked if he’d be prepared to write two chapters so we could see. Then he did an outline, which we always insisted upon. Despite Cape not being all that keen, they obviously didn’t want any other publisher to do it. So we signed up John. We got a perfectly satisfactory but not brilliant contract with Cape, but we got a marvelous contract with Putnam, and that happened because I was talking to Peter Israel in Frankfurt. He said he’d just lost a big name author from one imprint in their group and said he had a hunch that the right author to replace him is whoever it is that’s writing Bond. ‘Well, it will cost you, Peter,’ I said. We worked out a very unusual contract which had very low royalties on the hardcover provided that they put X thousand dollars in publicity, and that if it sold more than X, then they would pay an exceptionally high royalty on the paperback. And it worked. They had that promotion guarantee in the contract for the first four books, which of course were the ones that made the New York Times best-seller lists. After that, some reason, the sales fell off as the years went on.”

    After ushering in Gardner’s replacement in 1996 (Raymond Benson, the author of this article) and overseeing Benson’s first five (out of six) Bond novels, Janson-Smith retired. The Fleming family had recently bought back the fifty-one per cent of the shares of the company owned by Booker, and the new millennium brought about changes in Ian Fleming Publications’ board of directors. There were all kinds of new directions in which they wanted to take the literary Bond.

    During his time with Booker and Glidrose, Janson-Smith was also, for some years, a Family Director of Agatha Christie Ltd. and was responsible for the Booker part interest in the works of Georgette Heyer. “When Heyer’s son bought back all rights to his mother’s books, he appointed me his agent. I fulfilled that duty until I founded the Ampersand Agency with Peter Buckman and then I entrusted the Heyer estate to the agency.”

    Additionally, Janson-Smith was, until his retirement on 1st December 2009, for over thirty years the Executive Trustee of the Pooh Properties Trust (i.e. Winnie the Pooh) and was even longer the senior treasurer of the Royal Literary Fund (and for two years its President). He still acts as a consultant with the Ampersand Agency, has participated in the selection of the Steel Dagger Award nominations (an award created in honor of Ian Fleming), and is the President of the Ian Fleming Foundation. Having been married three times (Janson-Smith has four children, seven grandchildren, and two great-grandchildren), he currently lives a reasonably quiet life in London with his fourth partner, Lili Pohlmann (whose late husband, Eric Pohlmann, was coincidentally an actor who voiced the unseen character of Bond’s nemesis Ernst Stavro Blofeld in the film From Russia With Love).

    “At age eighty-seven,” Janson-Smith says, “it is time to call it a day, but I am still a consultant where my experience has a value. I suppose you could say I’m on the ‘inactive duty’ list of the Double-O section!”

  2. Does Time Warner need MGM?

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-24

    MarketWatch – Time Warner wants to help put MGM out of its misery.

    Time Warner’s takeover attempt underscores the value of a coveted film library. Does Time Warner need it, though?

    MGM possesses a valuable film library, numbering such classics as 12 Angry Men, Birdman of Alcatraz and the James Bond series. But the struggling studio also has a debt load of about $3.7 billion. Is the library worth the debt burden?

    AM Report: Google’s China GambleGoogle’s Chinese site has started redirecting search results via Hong Kong, which does not have the same censorship laws that the mainland has, Jason Dean reports from Beijing.
    Time Warner has apparently outbid such rivals as Lions Gate Entertainment and billionaire Len Blavatnik’s Access Industries for control of the fabled film company, according to wire-service reports Read AP report.Read Reuters report.

    The dollar figures appear to be in the range of $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion.

    Time Warner, a huge entertainment and media entity, shows movies regularly on its Home Box Office and other cable-television operations. It could always use more movies to show on its channels.

    MGM will take several weeks to assess the quality of the offers.

    This is an interesting time in the movie industry. Billionaire investor Carl Icahn is making an unsolicited bid to acquire Lions Gate, which in itself owns an enviable library of assets.

    In the past year, News Corp’s Avatar became the biggest-grossing film in history, topping even Titanic. (News Corp. is the parent company of MarketWatch, publisher of this report.)

    Perhaps entertainment companies think it is a sound investment to acquire successful properties, such as James Bond. That makes sense. But the risk of amassing all of that debt is a questionable practice.

    Keep your browsers pointed to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for all the latest James Bond news.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  3. Ian Fleming's The Blofeld Trilogy to hit US in September '10

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-23

    Ian Fleming’s The Blofeld Trilogy omnibus is due to be published stateside this upcoming September.

    As first reported on CommanderBond.net last year, this brand new James Bond omnibus collects together Fleming’s three 007 novels that make up the SPECTRE trilogy—Thunderball, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and You Only Live Twice.

    Ian Fleming's 'The Blofeld Trilogy'

    Ian Fleming’s The Blofeld Trilogy UK paperback

    With a new introduction by Nick Lezard.

    Ernst Stavro Blofeld is James Bond’s arch-nemesis: a deranged criminal mastermind with ambitions to bring the world to its knees in his pursuit of power. This collection brings together three novels featuring the ultimate Bond villain. First introduced in Thunderball, Blofeld’s plan to steal atomic bombs and hold the whole world to ransom leads to a thrilling chase in the Bahamas. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service sees Blofeld developing terrifying weapons—and destroying the one thing Bond holds most dear—and in You Only Live Twice, the shattered secret agent must get his revenge in one last, deadly encounter.

    Including a new introduction by journalist Nick Lezard, The Blofeld Trilogy will be published in paperback and retail for $22.00. It is due to be published on 28 September and can currently be pre-ordered online:

    Keep turning to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for the most up-to-date literary James Bond coverage on the web.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  4. Time Warner said to plan $1.5 billion MGM studio bid

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-23

    BusinessWeek – Time Warner Inc. plans to bid $1.5 billion for the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. film studio, according to a person with knowledge of the decision.

    The owner of the Warner Bros. movie studio intends to put in the second-round offer today, said the person, who declined to be named because the talks are private. MGM said today it received several bids and will seek additional delays on interest payments.

    Bids must be high enough to win over MGM’s creditors, who may restructure the studio’s debt instead. John Malone’s Liberty Media Corp. and hedge fund Elliott Management Corp., working with Relativity Media, decided not to bid, people with knowledge of the situation said March 17.

    MGM, distributor of the James Bond films, put itself up for sale last year after failing to make interest payments on $3.7 billion of debt. The Los Angeles-based studio owns a 4,100-film library and has a co-production deal with Warner Bros. for movies based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s novel The Hobbit. The studio was taken private for $5 billion in 2005 by buyers including Providence Equity Partners.

    New York-based Time Warner was considering a bid of $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion, with Warner Bros. executives pushing for the higher end of the range, people familiar with the matter said March 18.

    Time Warner, which also owns CNN and HBO, rose 4 cents to $31.28 today in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have gained 7.3 percent this year.

    Keep your browsers pointed to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for all the latest James Bond news.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  5. Era ends for James Bond Rolex Submariner Date wristwatch

    By Guest writer on 2010-03-22

    Written by: Dell Deaton, www.jamesbondwatches.com author-creator

    Basel, Switzerland— For the first time in the history of James Bond films, Rolex is no longer offering a current watch model that’s consistent with any on-screen choice of 007.

    A new Rolex Submariner Date reference 116610LN has just been introduced at Baselworld 2010 (March 18-25), the premier trade show for the wristwatch industry, held annually in Basel, Switzerland. It replaces the Rolex 16610 Sub Date which was introduced in 1988, according to experts Franca E. Guido Mondani and Lele Ravagnani, who discussed this in their definitive book, Rolex Submariner Story.

    Era ends for James Bond Rolex Submariner Date wristwatch

    Rolex model 16610 Submariner Date wristwatch.
    Image courtesy JamesBondWatches.com and Dell Deaton.

    It’s most likely that actor Timothy Dalton wore a Rolex 16610 for his second outing as James Bond in Licence to Kill, a film that opened during the summer of 1989.

    The history of Rolex and the movie-Bond character dates back to 1961 and pre-production planning for the first Eon Productions contribution to this series, Dr. No. From the very beginning, filmmakers recognized the importance of wristwatch selection in fleshing out their lead man. As John Cork and Bruce Scivally emphasized in James Bond: The Legacy, “he could not just wear a watch, it needed to be a Rolex.”

    Over the years, performers changed as Bond was variously played by Sean Connery, George Lazenby, and Roger Moore. So, too, did the Rolex models that were featured on their wrists. But Rolex is renowned for the slow pace at which it changes designs and shifts direction in technology. So even as movies came along where James Bond would carry out missions with the support of competing brands, local Rolex dealers could continue to offer new stocks of models consistent with whatever 007 had worn last time he had had a Rolex.

    For example, Christie’s auctions verify that two Rolex model 5513 Submariner wristwatches were modified to suggest Q-Branch gadget functions for the December 1973 release of Live and Let Die. Rolex continued to produce the 5513 into 1989 — albeit sufficiently evolved in appearance by then to no longer qualify as what JamesBondWatches.com would consider screen-correct (“proper reference number” notwithstanding).

    After The Man with the Golden Gun in 1974, fifteen years and six films passed without another James Bond Rolex watch.

    Era ends for James Bond Rolex Submariner Date wristwatch

    Rolex model 16610 Submariner Date wristwatch. Image courtesy JamesBondWatches.com and Dell Deaton.

    Then Licence to Kill began filming and the Rolex affiliation was renewed with the first (and, thus far, only) appearance of its Submariner Date wristwatch. Given the frequency with which “Rolex” is cited in connection with James Bond, it’s rather ironic that Licence to Kill is the sole film in which 007 wore a wristwatch with the signature date-magnifier that Rolex founder Hans Wilsdorf so firmly established as an icon for his watch company.

    Neither Rolex nor Eon Productions has ever specifically identified the Licence to Kill timekeeper. But director John Glen in his autobiography, For My Eyes Only, tied the start of filming to July of 1988. At that time, as Mondani and Ravagnani have documented, no less than three Rolex Sub Date model reference numbers could have been available through authorized dealers at retail.

    Submariner Date 16800: Produced 1979-1988.

    Submariner Date 168000: Produced 1987-1988.

    Submariner Date 16610: Produced 1988 until just recently.

    Based solely on what can be seen on film, it’s impossible to say for certain which was actually worn by Timothy Dalton as James Bond. Referred to as the “Leiter Wedding Rolex” for serious researchers and collectors, all that can be said is that a screen-correct version should have a sapphire crystal, glossy dial, and “bicchierini” indices (that is, time-markers surrounded by white gold).

    There are, of course, technical differences among these three otherwise seeming look-alikes. Changes to case metal composition enhanced corrosion resistance. The earlier 3035 caliber movement from 1977 replaced by the 3135 improved durability.

    Additionally, by the time work began on Licence to Kill, producers were dedicated to appointing James Bond with the latest in materials. Wristwatches were not only current models, but, by the late 1980s, just after the SEIKO period, some of the most advanced of their time. This certainly favors selection of the 16610 over similar alternatives. And, as stated in Rolex Submariner Story, cases for this reference were being produced as far back as 1986 in anticipation of releasing the 16610 wristwatch two years later.

    Clearly there was a strategy to roll out the 16610 reference as 16800 and 168000 inventories depleted. A plan no doubt enhanced by the widely established popularity of the Rolex Submariner Date.

    Era ends for James Bond Rolex Submariner Date wristwatch

    Rolex model 116610LN Submariner Date wristwatch, just introduced at Baselworld 2010. Image courtesy Rolex.

    Eon Productions had come to enjoy a close connection to the Rolex brand over the years since Dr. No. Over half of all 007 films released before Licence to Kill feature Rolex watches; several highlight more than one. Despite lack of any formal product placement credit, these watches were shown in more close-ups than any competing model. Rolex was chosen to serve as the first elaborate gadget-watch. Albert R. “Cubby” Broccoli and Harry Saltzman chose Rolex to reward great service by team members such as that of Peter Hunt on You Only Live Twice in 1967.

    Both Rolex and Eon had an interest in having the very latest Sub Date model for Timothy Dalton when 007 returned to the watchmaker of Ian Fleming after its decade-and-a-half absence. It’s hard to imagine that anyone inside this film production would have settled for old stock. Cubby Broccoli himself was on hand for Licence to Kill with a continued commitment to make fantastic things happen.

    In the years since then, the Rolex 16610 has changed little. The bracelet is technically different, and the lugs no longer have holes that pass all the way through for its springbars.

    But the new 116610LN that replaces it is obviously changed.

    Readily apparent is its ceramic “Cerachrom” bezel insert with platinum gradations, fitted to a case with much larger crown guards. The bracelet features a completely redesigned clasp design and functioning.

    Water resistance is rated to a depth of 300 meters / 1,000 feet, protected by a case made from 904L steel, with timekeeping provided by a COSC-certified 3135 caliber movement: These are the same as what’s found in the 16610, of course. Yet the 116610LN is sufficiently different overall as to deny any claim this newest Rolex Submariner Date might otherwise make to James Bond watch status. It’s more than a different number. In the world of 007, there are no substitutes.

    Baselworld 2010 closes this Thursday, March 25. With it, a chapter in movie history that dates back to 1961 will end as well.

    But— like James Bond himself: Will Rolex return?


    Dell Deaton is the creator-author of JamesBondWatches.com and guest curator for the “Bond Watches, James Bond Watches” exhibition, June 18, 2010 through April 30, 2011. He is a member of both the National Watch & Clock Association and American Marketing Association, and a recognized expert on Ian Fleming and James Bond horology. Previously, he was elected to a three-year term on the board of directors that governs the Center for Exhibition Industry Research, and served three terms on the editorial advisory board for Exhibitor Publications.

  6. MGM pushes back deadline on bids

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-20

    Variety – Beleaguered MGM appears to have pushed back the deadline for binding offers until at least Monday.
    The studio had no comment as Friday’s deadline for bids passed. The three most likely bidders—Access Industries, Lionsgate and Time Warner—also had no comment as to whether any of them had submitted offers.

    Several people familiar with the situation said MGM had indicated it was extending the deadline.

    The assets include rights to the James Bond and Hobbit franchises, a 4,000-title library and the MGM and United Artists logos and current operations. A decline in DVD revenues has led to a decline in expectations as to how much MGM would fetch in the auction.

    If bids fall short of expectations or no bids materialize, MGM could attempt a recapitalization through investment bank Qualia Capital through a cash infusion and a debt-to-equity transaction that would allow MGM to remain in business as a stand-alone entity.

    Since turnaround specialist Stephen Cooper came on board as chairman, the debt holders have agreed three times to hold off on receiving debt payments, with the most recent extension going to March 31. MGM’s facing repayment of its $250 million revolving credit line in early April and a $1 billion payment on its $3.7 billion debt in July 2011.

    Keep your browsers pointed to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for all the latest James Bond news.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  7. Time Warner still mulling MGM bid as deadline passes

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-19

    Los Angeles Times – The fate of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. is still in limbo.

    While bids for the troubled studio were due Friday, front-runner Time Warner Inc. was still mulling an offer late in the afternoon and it was unclear if, and when, the media company was going to bid, according to a person close to the matter. Two knowledgeable people said that if Time Warner, which owns Warner Bros. studio, did make an offer, it was expected to be under $1.5 billion.

    It’s possible that MGM has been forced to extend the deadline for final bids as Disney recently did with its Miramax Films unit, which is also up for sale. But as of Friday evening there was no official word and a spokeswoman for MGM didn’t have any comment.

    The field of prospective buyers for both studios has dwindled in recent weeks as the valuations being put on the properties came into question. John Malone’s Liberty Media and hedge fund Elliott Associates dropped out of the auction for MGM as Friday’s deadline for binding offers approached; earlier Summit Entertainment and investment firm Qualia Capital bowed out of the running for Miramax.

    Other expected to bid for MGM are industrialist Len Blavatnik’s Access Industries and Lions Gate Entertainment, but it couldn’t be determined if they had submitted bids yet. Early Friday morning, Carl Icahn launched a hostile takeover bid for Lions Gate and wants to block the company from buying MGM. Lions Gate had no comment but last week Vice Chairman Michael Burns said in an interview with The Times that, “We never pay retail for any asset.”

    It is unclear whether the bids expected to be submitted will be enough to appease MGM’s 150 creditors, who are said to be seeking at least $2 billion. Consequently, many believe the debt holders may call off the sale and opt for a plan to restructure MGM’s $3.7-billion debt and seek new capital—or, as a last recourse, force the company into bankruptcy.

    There are at least two alternative plans in the wings, including one from Twentieth-Century Fox parent News Corp. and another from Qualia Capital, a media investment fund run by Amir Malin and Ken Schapiro.

    For several weeks, prospective buyers have been privately complaining they’ve been unable to get detailed financial information from MGM. Several suitors said that the more data they get, the more grim MGM’s prospects appear. They say that current cash flow from the studio’s film library of about 4,000 titles is no more than $250 million—about half of what it was a few years ago—with future projections declining.

    Keep your browsers pointed to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for all the latest James Bond news.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  8. MGM awaits new partner

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-19

    Variety – MGM’s murky future should come into sharper focus today, two days after the struggling studio mounted what may be its last hurrah with the preem of Hot Tub Time Machine.

    With binding offers due today, MGM’s St. Patrick’s Day screening at the Hollywood ArcLight and the after-party at the Cabana Club could wind up being the Lion’s final public outing as a stand-alone studio. It was the first MGM premiere since September when Fame preemed at the Grove and only the second since late 2008, when Valkyrie screened at DGA headquarters. And Tub, which opens March 26, will be the last MGM pic to launch until The Zookeeper opens Oct. 8.

    Wednesday’s event unveiling the $45 million comedy was a light-hearted affair with little chatter among the hundreds of guests about the ultimate fate of MGM, which put itself up for sale four months ago. Studio president Mary Parent and VPs Cale Boyter and Luke Ryan mingled along with Stephen Cooper, the corporate turnaround specialist who came on board as Lion chairman last summer.

    Debt-laden MGM invited a half-dozen suitors last month to participate in a second round of bidding, which included allowing those that qualified to pore over MGM’s internal financials. Though no one has announced a formal bid, the most likely candidates are Time Warner, Lionsgate and Len Blavatnik’s Access Industries.

    People close to the situation believe Access has indicated it is willing to make an offer of as much as $2 billion. Lionsgate’s offer is pegged in a range between $1.4 billion and $1.8 billion while Time Warner’s offer is expected to be in the $1.5 billion range. Potential bids by John Malone’s Liberty Media and Ryan Kavanaugh’s Relativity Media with hedge fund Elliott Management aren’t expected to materialize.

    Each bid contains unique challenges. Access would establish itself as a showbiz player but would likely sell off MGM’s rights to the James Bond and Hobbit franchises. Time Warner, sitting on a wad of $5 billion in cash from the recent spinoff of its cable systems, would be able to fully exploit Bond and Hobbit (which it is already co-producing through New Line) but probably has little use for the 4,000-title library. Lionsgate, which has historically grown partly through library acquisitions, isn’t set up to do tentpoles such as the Bond movies and would likely seek a partner or sell off the franchises.

    The submission of binding bids means that MGM will meet within the next week or so with its debtholders to sort out what to do next. Possibilities include picking one of the offers, starting a third round of bidding or going the route of recapitalizing. A recapitalization bid could bring investment bank Qualia Capital or News Corp. into the picture.

    Qualia, operated by former Artisan exec Ken Shapiro and Amir Malin, is believed to have proposed a combination of a cash infusion and a debt-to-equity transaction that would allow MGM to remain in business with its existing management. The Lion has said that one of its options for dealing with its crushing $3.7 billion debt load is to find a partner or remain a stand-alone entity.

    It’s uncertain if the numbers being bandied about as the price for MGM assets—which include MGM and United Artists names and logos and MGM’s TV operations—will be high enough to meet expectations of the 140 MGM debt holders. And since MGM’s privately held, there’s no specific sale deadline as long as the debt holders go along.

    Since Cooper came on board, the debt holders have agreed three times to extend the debt payments, with the most recent extension going to March 31. MGM’s facing repayment of its $250 million revolving credit line in early April and a $1 billion payment on its $3.7 billion debt in July 2011.

    The only pics in Leo’s pipeline after Hot Tub Time Machine and The Zookeeper are a Red Dawn remake in November and a 3D Cabin the Woods in January.

    Keep your browsers pointed to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for all the latest James Bond news.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  9. Charlie Higson's 2010 Young Bond tour stops announced

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-18
    Charlie Higson

    Charlie Higson

    Back in October of last year, CommanderBond.net reported that Charlie Higson would be embarking on his first Young Bond tour in the US since the launch of Blood Fever in 2006.

    To kick off in May 2010, the tour would support the release of his fifth Young James Bond adventure, By Royal Command, the SilverFin Graphic Novel and the non-Bond horror novel The Enemy, all of which are released stateside the month.

    Now, thanks to the always up-to-date Young Bond Dossier, we can bring you the first set of tour stops so you know when and where to meet up with Charlie…

    Sunday, 23 May

    Monday, 24 May

    Wednesday, 26 May

    Thursday, 27 May

    Saturday, 29 May

    Be sure to stay tuned to the CommanderBond.net main page (and our Discussion Forums) as more stops on Higson’s US book tour are announced.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace

  10. Time Warner said to be considering bid for MGM studio

    By Devin Zydel on 2010-03-18

    BusinessWeek – Time Warner Inc. is considering a bid of $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion for the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. film studio, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions, as second-round offers come due tomorrow.

    Warner Bros. executives, including Chief Executive Officer Barry Meyer and Chief Operating Officer Alan Horn, will iron out a possible price tomorrow with Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes, said one of the people, who declined to be named because the talks are private. Time Warner may decide not to make an offer, the people said.

    An offer at that price may not be enough to win over MGM’s creditors, who have allowed the studio to delay making payments on about $3.7 billion in debt until March 31, said David Bank, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets in New York. Time Warner is among a dwindling number of prospective buyers after John Malone’s Liberty Media Corp. and hedge fund Elliott Management Corp., working with Relativity Media, decided not to bid, people with knowledge of the bidding said yesterday.

    “At those kinds of levels, the bondholders are probably going to look at a restructuring,” said Bank, who rates Time Warner shares “outperform.” “That’s not an objectionable price for Time Warner shareholders to be looking at, but it’s definitely not what the debt holders were looking for.”

    Executives at the Warner Bros. film studio are pushing for an offer at the higher end of the range, the people said.

    Keith Cocozza, a spokesman for New York-based Time Warner, declined to comment, as did Susie Arons, an outside spokeswoman for Los Angeles-based MGM.

    ‘Not Good Enough’

    If bids come in below $2 billion, there’s a realistic possibility creditors will say, “‘Sorry, not good enough,’ and decide to kick this can a little further down the road,” said Roger Smith, executive editor of Global Media Intelligence. He’s the former finance chief of Carolco Pictures and former head of strategic planning for Warner Communications, now Time Warner.

    Time Warner, the parent company of Warner Bros., fell 4 cents to $31.16 at 4 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have gained 6.9 percent this year.

    MGM’s value fell below a price Engelwood, Colorado-based Liberty Media thought would be acceptable to MGM’s creditors, two people said yesterday.

    MGM’s $3.7 billion term loan dropped to as low as about 50.75 cents on the dollar today and then rebounded to about 51.25 cents, according to two people familiar with the trades, who declined to be identified because the transactions are private. The loan finished trading yesterday at about 54 cents.

    Also exploring a second-round bid are billionaire Len Blavatnik’s Access Industries and Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., people close to the process said last month.

    Alternative to Bid

    As an alternative to the bidders, News Corp., parent of Twentieth Century Fox, and Qualia Capital LLC, led by Amir Malin and Ken Schapiro, have each proposed restructuring MGM’s debt and injecting cash to recapitalize the company, people with knowledge of the process said in January.

    MGM, distributor of the James Bond movies, was taken private for $5 billion by buyers including Providence Equity Partners in 2005. It owns a film library with 4,100 titles and has a co-production deal with Warner Bros. on the planned film The Hobbit, based on the J.R.R. Tolkien novel.

    “The risk comes in making some assumptions about what the future of home entertainment looks like and what the future stream of cash flow out of the library might be,” said Chris Marangi, an analyst with Rye, New York-based Gabelli & Co.

    Keep your browsers pointed to the CommanderBond.net main page and our Discussion Forums for all the latest James Bond news.

    Visit CommanderBond.net on…
    Twitter | Facebook | MySpace