CommanderBond.net
  1. Diamonds Are Forever: A Flawed Gem

    By Guest writer on 2004-05-13

    AN ARTICLE BY ED HARRIS

    When the James Bond series is considered, the titles usually brought up are Goldfinger, The Spy Who Loved Me and since it’s the most recent one, Die Another Day. While it is quite easy to find the benchmarks in any series, there are quite a few entries in the series that are quite underrated. Our first subject is the seventh Bond film, Diamonds Are Forever (1971). Marking the return of Sean Connery to the series after the George Lazenby experiment, it was a resounding hit all over the world and paved the way for the lighter style the Roger Moore Bond films would adapt. It brought a light, airy touch but still delivered the goods, providing a solid piece of entertainment that is both a worthy conclusion to On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and also a good change of pace as far as tone goes.

    Despite this, the film has seemingly slipped under the radar of some fans. It is my intent to pay a proper, honest tribute to this overlooked entry in the series. Since my background is with screenwriting, I will be looking at this film and hopefully future films from a story and character perspective, examining what worked and why it worked and what didn’t work and why in the long run it really doesn’t hurt the film all that much.

    The film starts us off where Connery’s previous film ended, in Japan. While some feel this was an attempt to get some distance from On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, I read it as a simple matter of Bond backtracking to find Blofeld. He knows Switzerland is out so looking in the last place he encountered the man makes perfect sense. The first scene, and in fact the entire pre-title sequence gives the audience what seems to be a fitting conclusion to the previous film-Bond getting revenge for the death of his wife.

    Bond remains unseen for the scene in Japan and the following Casino scene in Cairo. While the audience knows Connery is back as Bond, Connery’s return was the primary marketing piece of the film, it makes good story sense to give a decent “movie star” buildup to the actor’s return. The reveal of Connery is handled very nicely with Marie glancing up and Connery walking down into frame uttering the line “My name is Bond, James Bond.”

    The Bond Theme comes up and we get a prime example of what makes Connery’s Bond so good. He begins with charm but quickly switches to casual brutality in the blink of an eye in the “bikini choke” scene. This scene has been discussed elsewhere on the site so I don’t need to go too deep but I will say that it works for Connery’s Bond generally and the pre-title sequence itself more specifically. Bond has always been portrayed as a good man but not necessarily a nice man. Granted there is some subtext that can be found, but I feel it adds to the complexity of the character more than anything else.

    As for its place in the sequence, Bond is clearly on a mission of revenge which the audience is given credit for knowing by the filmmakers. While some films would have gone to great lengths to show exactly why Bond is out for blood and acting as violently as he is shown in the sequence, the filmmakers know that the people who saw the last film remember the death of Bond’s wife and a reminder would be extraneous. It’s good, lean storytelling.

    Following this, we are reintroduced to Blofeld, now being played by Charles Gray. Gray’s Blofeld has been criticized but for me, the casting works just fine. Gray is a very good actor and plays the role with suave menace. Whatever faults the character has have more to do with the screenplay than the performance. Making Blofeld British also makes some sense in terms of story. It’s fairly clear in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service that Blofeld wants to disappear at some point; the usual hefty ransom is replaced by a request for a full pardon and recognition as a Count. Here, we see he’s using plastic surgery to get doubles, possibly to fake his death if Bond finds him.

    One interesting aspect of Blofeld in this film as well as the previous one is the lack of SPECTRE being mentioned in any way, shape or form. This could be because Bond basically smashed the organization in Thunderball and You Only Live Twice and possibly finished off whatever was left between You Only Live Twice and On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. Diamonds Are Forever is not just significant because of Connery’s return; it also shows the final downfall of Ernst Stavro Blofeld and what is left of SPECTRE.

    In You Only Live Twice, SPECTRE is using a hollowed out volcano which couldn’t have been cheap. By the next film, Blofeld is using an already built hotel that he probably purchased with reserve funds and by this film he just acquires his base through kidnapping.

    Back to the scene, we see that Bond has infiltrated some sort of hideout in a cave where Blofeld has been prepping plastic surgery patients. In what could be seen as a nod to Goldfinger, Bond takes off a surgeon’s outfit to reveal a nice suit. His almost contemptuous tossing of the smock into a corner is also an interesting bit that I think shows a bit of insight into the Bond we see in the pre-title sequence. While he’s rather down to earth and laid back for most of the film, Connery plays it rather dark and violent in the pre-title sequence, as seen with the scene with Marie. This is Bond out for revenge, calm and methodical with an added brutality, understandable given why he’s looking for Blofeld. This is in stark contrast to the somewhat out of control Bond we’ll see in Licence to Kill.

    Bond senses the man in the mud bath aiming a gun at him (never mind that a gun wouldn’t operate too well after being submerged in mud) with an almost cat-like response, whipping his head around and drowning the man in the mud. The reveal that the man wasn’t Blofeld works, even though he was resting in the mud beforehand, there’s a big difference between submerging of your own free will and suddenly having a bunch of mud dumped on your head. We get a bit of background from Blofeld when he reappears that serves as a nice bit of foreshadowing for the plot twist we’ll see later.

    The ensuing fight is quick and brutal, like the rest of the pre-title sequence with a nasty little mousetrap gadget and Bond’s creative use of scalpels providing a bit more blood than usual. The ease with which Bond disposes of Blofeld is a bit of a sticking point but honestly a one on one between Connery and Gray wouldn’t work all that well. The key to this sequence for me is at the end when we see a look of relief come over Bond’s face after he kills Blofeld, the first smile we’ve seen from Bond in a while and a sign that he’s back to normal. The reappearance of the cat also gives a bit of foreshadowing as Bond notices it and while we don’t see his entire face, one can safely assume a look of apprehension follows.

    For me, this sequence along with the rest of film is about Bond getting back to being the Bond we know and love. While GoldenEye can be seen as being about Bond moving into the present, this film, or at least the pre-title sequence, can be seen as being about Bond coping with his loss and getting back on his feet. The brutality with which he gets his revenge in the pre-title sequence is his way of closing the issue and it allows him to relax for the better part of the movie.

    With that little bit of subtext out of the way, we are taken into the main titles accompanied by Maurice Binder’s lovely visuals and the title song sung by Shirley Bassey which is low key and very easy on the ears. The same can be said for John Barry’s score which fits the film perfectly and keeps the low key, relaxed level the film itself carries.

    The film proper throws us right into the main plot with Bond and M looking over some diamonds. We see Bond relaxed enough to toy with M a bit and question whether or not the 00-section is really needed for what he calls a “relatively simple smuggling matter”. The scene with Sir Donald is one of the best in the film and flows with a smoothness that makes the rather large amount of exposition go down quite easily.

    The scene is also a chance for a bit of humor, Bond’s exchange with M about the sherry. It also references the dinner scene in Goldfinger with the brandy, another nod to Bond films of the past that can be found in the film. Die Another Day is not the only film to do this; you can find these little nods in most of the films if you look hard enough. The sherry exchange also leads to M getting a little bit of payback when Bond refreshingly proves to not be the foremost expert on diamonds, to say the least. There is also the nice little line about Bond being on a break. While the reference is actually a nod to Connery’s work between 1967 and 1971, I always felt it was also a reference to the pre-title sequence, as is evidenced by Bond’s line “Oh hardly relaxing, but most satisfying”. Its little bits like this that make the script for the film so good, it’s a pity the film doesn’t sustain itself as well towards the end.

    The exposition itself is also handled brilliantly by screenwriter Tom Mankiewicz who takes the words and makes them cinematic, adhering to a big rule of film: show, don’t tell. Within the quick explanation of how the diamond mining’s security precautions work we also get an introduction to the henchmen Wint and Kidd as they kill two contacts and make off with a shipment of diamonds. This is done in a low key style with the villains being as casual as possible yet still maintaining a menacing quality. While some might think this is a mistake, I like the fact that unlike most Bond films, this one keeps the pace relatively low key. Even a broader entry like Moonraker operates at a faster pace due to the over the top style it uses to tell the story. Diamonds Are Forever is over the top but in a more muted, calm fashion. The characters of Wint and Kidd have been criticized for being too humorous but I think that that element makes them more effective as villains. And honestly, Bruce Glover and Putter Smith do play the characters as menacing as they can while still staying light and low key which seems to be what director Guy Hamilton wanted.

    The sequence of scenes is very interesting, the cross-cutting between Bond’s briefing and Wint and Kidd eliminating the links to the pipeline, including Mrs. Whistler gets a lot of story out of the way in a matter of minutes but still, the plot is very easy to follow. Like the rest of the screenplay, this is a fine example of good, lean storytelling. Manciewicz spends just enough time with exposition to give you the points you need for the moment and moves on. Same goes for general storytelling as he gives you a fairly complex plot in a brisk manner that still allows for understanding.

    From this, we get Bond being assigned to impersonate Peter Franks in Holland. Like the untraditional briefing scene, the obligatory scene with Moneypenny is also done somewhat differently. Here, she appears undercover to supply Bond with some necessary items. This might be improbable seeing as she’s only the boss’s secretary, but it seems apparent this was the only space the filmmakers could find to insert her character. Her scene also features a veiled reference to Tracy, the request for the diamond ring that most people overlook. Watch Connery in the scene and pay attention to the pause before the line. You can tell for a brief second he’s thinking of her possibly. A very subtle moment that is easy to miss.

    This transitions nicely into the Bond Theme as a hovercraft takes Bond into Amsterdam for his undercover work as Peter Franks. After the payoff to the little old lady smuggler, we come to the introduction of our Bond Girl, Tiffany Case. Tiffany is both a high point and a low point in the film. She starts off very well but unfortunately takes a downward turn in the final quarter of the film. Despite that, her first scene is an excellent introduction, full of great dialogue and surprises. From the get-go Tiffany proves to be unpredictable, first appearing to be a blond and then turning out to be a redhead.

    We get a clear idea of the type of person Case is in her first few seconds on screen. A cocky, smooth operator who is not fazed by Bond’s flirtations and knows how to take care of herself. She also seems to be well-funded; the fingerprint scanning gadget in her bedroom is a nice touch to the character and gives an air of professionalism to her. Bond’s amused reaction to the glass is a nice touch as well as is the payoff to the scene when we learn Bond has actually faked her out with fake fingerprints. The scene also gives us a nice way to put an obstacle in Bond’s path by having Q bring up Franks’s escape almost as an afterthought. The neat little business with missiles being loaded into the Aston Martin in the background is also a nice addition.

    The scene with Bond and Franks is a great set-piece, starting off with Connery’s humorous fake accent that lulls Franks into a sense of security. The ensuing fight is wonderfully choreographed and unique with the tight quarters making for a surprisingly brutal fight considering the light tone of the film. The fight also shows Connery to be fine condition, despite what some have said. Has he put on some pounds? Yes, but the fight still looks great and Connery seems to enjoy himself throughout the film. His ensuing scene with Tiffany walks the fine line between effective writing and shameless self awareness. Still, it makes sense that a diamond smuggler like Tiffany would at least know Bond by reputation, even if her knowledge was restricted to overheard conversations and second-hand information. The scene also works to get Tiffany in an actual working relationship with Bond, showing him where the diamonds are and tying them in with Mrs. Whistler.

    This takes us to Bond getting the diamonds into L.A., a sequence that moves with a brisk pace quickly showing the ruse Bond is using and that he and Tiffany are being tailed by Wint and Kidd. Bond’s arrival in Los Angeles brings us to the only real casting problem the film has as Felix Leiter is introduced posing as a customs agent. While Norman Burton gives a capable enough performance, the character is a bit too old and lacking in energy, a stark contrast to the character’s previous appearance in Thunderball.

    This brings us to the Morton Slumber sequence. The opening dialogue with Slumber is dead solid perfect, both men know exactly what they’re doing and what they’re talking about but the screenwriter is intelligent enough to not spell it out for the audience, letting the dialogue and story speak for themselves. The scene also shows us the cremation chamber, a wonderfully gruesome way of getting the diamonds out of Franks’s corpse. The chamber established, the film quickly lets us know that Wint and Kidd are present and does a fine job of quickly moving the story along as Bond is almost immediately knocked out after getting the envelope of money.

    The scene with Bond in the coffin is a personal favorite as the screenwriter actually paints himself into a corner, trapping 007 in a coffin that itself is trapped inside a very small space. His rescue by Shady Tree, whom we have already seen taking the urn of diamonds is fun because it accomplishes two things. First off, it gives the character of Tree a distinctly memorable introduction and personality so Bond can recognize his face later. Second, it plays with the audience’s expectations as generally one would not expect an escape from a deathtrap to come in the form of an irascible old man. Bond’s dialogue with Tree and Slumber afterwards is a nice little switcheroo as it turns out that not only were the diamonds Bond smuggled in fake, so was the money he was paid off with.

    The whole trip from Amsterdam to L.A. might seem pointless after this scene, but I like the feel of unpredictability the twist gives. It shows that Bond can’t really trust Tiffany and this “relatively simple smuggling matter” should be handled otherwise. As far as first act twists go, it takes a lot of balls to have the entire first act turn out to be nothing more than a means to get Bond into Las Vegas.

    The first part of the Vegas sequence, i.e. everything up until Plenty goes into the pool is a blend of good, quick storytelling-Willard Whyte and Shady Tree are established fluidly in the same shot and Saxby is introduced along with the fact that Wint and Kidd appear to be working for him and by default, Willard Whyte and classic Bondian style-Bond winning at craps and his introduction to Plenty. The fast pace helps cover up a rather glaring flaw in the film, namely that Plenty has practically nothing to do with the rest of the film and only serves as a way to get Bond into a room alone with Tiffany.

    This brings me to a realization I had about the film. It plays, especially in the early Vegas parts of the film like a Rat Pack film. The tone is relaxed and the plot is not really focused on too heavily, in fact the plot seems to be on autopilot for the most part. One could easily replace Connery with Frank Sinatra and cast Dean Martin as Felix Leiter and end up with a very good Rat Pack caper film. Quite appropriate given the Sammy Davis Jr. cameo that ended up on the cutting room floor. This ends up being both a blessing and a curse as we will see.

    The light, brisk tone continues into the Circus Circus sequence and Tiffany evading Leiter’s men and performing an artful double cross. I like how the filmmakers subtly show Tiffany spotting the agents and immediately figuring there is some sort of setup. The scene is carried out quite well with the only dialogue being the usual circus chatter. The following scene at Tiffany’s house engages in a nice little turnabout as Tiffany and Bond switch positions of power with Bond now in control. It’s not executed perfectly though, the writing seems a bit rushed, a phenomenon that will reappear later as the film progresses.

    This brings us to maybe the best sequence in the film, the tracking of the diamonds. The writing and execution of this is sequence is almost perfect with Tiffany’s distraction and the expository information given prior to it delivered smart and efficiently. I especially love the music as Dr. Metz enters the underground complex, pure Bond. His snooping around and toying with Metz is done wonderfully by Connery. The ensuing moon buggy scene is something of a mixed bag for me. While the design is impressive, the music for the chase and the chase itself are somewhat underwhelming. Much better is the car chase in Vegas following the moon buggy chase. The stunts are well done and the action is filmed much better and has a more dynamic feel to it, largely thanks to the Vegas scenery in the background. Odd since the same second unit was at work in both scenes. Strange.

    This leads to my favorite sequence in the entire movie, Bond scaling the Whyte House. The casualness with which Connery plays the scene is great and perfect for the tone of the film. It also leads the audience into expecting a confrontation with Whyte. The subsequent revelation that Blofeld is posing as Whyte is handled rather nicely in my opinion. While some may complain that Bond doesn’t show much surprise, I feel it’s a perfectly reasonable response on his part. After all, this is the same man who managed to get out of an exploding volcano and survive an apparent broken neck. He has very few surprises left for Bond. The dialogue scene is wonderfully written with Gray providing an elegant, suavely menacing version of Blofeld. This scene is also a fine example of why good screenwriting is so important. Put bluntly, this scene is basically roughly five minutes of raw exposition. Gray and Connery are very charming and charismatic and they play the scene in a smooth fluid manner that makes it go by quickly. The trick with the cat is also a neat touch.

    For me, the most interesting part of this scene is the fact that for the first time, a Bond villain actually chooses to not spend five minutes explaining his plan to Bond in full detail. This leads us back to my earlier theory about Blofeld over the course of the film and the two preceding it. Apart from a passing reference, SPECTRE isn’t mentioned in either this film or the previous two. I maintain that Blofeld is at this point desperate for money and really doesn’t have that much of a plan to begin with. Why else would a clearly insane megalomaniac choose to not revel in telling his arch nemesis his plans?

    The scene with Bond in the pipeline is also nicely done, a neat little blend of humor and some tension. I especially enjoy the “Snidely Whiplash” laughing that Wint and Kidd indulge in as they drive away from the pipeline. The ploy with Bond impersonating Saxby is a wonderful way to get Bond to Whyte’s location. A small flub is that Saxby turns up later even though Blofeld was talking with Bond, but it’s reasonable to assume that he called Saxby to check on his progress at a later time.

    The Whyte rescue works well with Bond surprisingly getting beaten up by Bambi and Thumper. The actual rescue is amusingly low key, as is the rest of the film. This is one place I think the low key tone doesn’t quite work as Whyte seems to be way too laid back considering he’s been kidnapped. Sadly after the rescue, the film goes downhill with the most glaring change being with Tiffany. For some reason the intelligent, resourceful character in the first ninety minutes is replaced by an annoying idiot. The less said about Blofeld in drag the better, in fact I try to forget it whenever I see the film. For the life of me I have no idea why the script ended up falling apart in the third act like it ends up doing, but there you go. It has a very rushed, unsatisfactory feel to it with the lone exception being Bond almost by chance finding Blofeld’s oil rig. The script also for some reason abandons the sleek, streamlined storytelling in favor of a muddled, unsatisfying resolution.

    The buildup to the oil rig is fine but once we get there the story just falls apart. Too many questions are left unanswered. Why does Tiffany suddenly appear to be on Blofeld’s side? Why would Blofeld have had the satellite controls run by a tape that can be accessed as easily as humanly possible? What exactly is Blofeld’s plan again? All we get is something about a ransom for him to not melt the world and the ploy of world peace he used to get Dr. Metz on the team but apart from that there’s really isn’t that much. On the other hand, it does fit with my theory that Blofeld doesn’t really have much of a plan this time out.

    The countdown and battle aboard the rig is incredibly uninspiring, nothing really noteworthy aside from machine gun fire and some explosions. The death of Blofeld is also not very well done; he doesn’t even get a moment where he sees he’s about to die. A last look between him and Bond would have been just fine. That or the original idea of a boat chase followed by the fight between the two characters. The third act partially redeems itself with the coda aboard the boat. The fight with Wint and Kidd is decent and ends the film on a relatively good note.

    The film falls apart in the third act. In actuality, for the first hour or so it’s one of the best Bond films ever. The pacing, writing and performances are great with many great moments and scenes. For whatever reason, everything that works in the film’s favor works against it as soon as Willard Whyte is rescued. While the light tone worked at fir first, I freely admit it kills the ending by making Blofeld’s plan murky and the action uninspired. That being said, the first three quarters of the film are quite good and as a whole, the film is certainly worth giving a second glance. The good far outweighs the bad.

    Ed Harris posts in the CBn Forums under the name of Genrewriter.

    Discuss this story in this thread.

  2. Titan's 'Octopussy' to Include Introduction by Maud Adams (update)

    By johncox on 2004-05-13

    5/27/04 UPDATE: The original May 21 release date announced by Titan has been changed to “June 2004.”

    On May 21 Titan Books will release OCTOPUSSY, the second book in their series of collected James Bond Daily Express comic strip adaptations by James Lawrence and illustrated by Yaroslav Horak. Previously it was annoucend that Ian Fleming’s niece, Lucy Fleming, would pen the introductions to these books. But today Titan has announced that this latest release will feature an introduction from Octopussy herself, Maud Adams.

    Bond is back! After 10 years out of print, the world’s greatest secret agent returns, in two classic adventures brought together in a deluxe James Bond collectors’ library paperback edition!

    When an old friend’s body is found in the Alps 20 years after he disappeared, James Bond quickly finds himself caught between Nazi gold, the Chinese Tongs and the eight-armed embrace of Octopussy! And Bond encounters more mortal danger beneath the waves whilst trailing a missing submarine in The Hildebrand Rarity!

    The second volume in this series contains an exclusive introduction from Octopussy herself, Maud Adams, and background material on the history of James Bond!

    • The second collection in an all-new Titan series of deluxe James Bond collectors’ library paperback editions.
    • The original newspaper material is now extremely rare and hard to find.
    • Back in print after over 10 years! The volume includes not only the classic Octopussy, but also an adaptation of the little-known short story The Hildebrand Rarity, written by Ian Fleming!
    • James Bond is one of the most successful characters in movie history, with 20 smash-hit movies to date. Die Another Day, the most recent James Bond film, took over £30 million in its opening weekend – the best ever for a Bond movie!

    James Lawrence began his writing career scripting training films for the US Armed Forces, and moved on to write features including Buck Rogers and Joe Palooka.

    Yaroslav Horak created the outback adventure strip Mike Steel for the Sydney Morning Herald, and illustrated all the Bond feature adventures bar Casino Royale.

    Titan released the collected The Man With The Golden Gun in March. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (which will also include the collected You Only Live Twice) is set for September 2004, and will feature an exclusive introduction by James Bond himself, George Lazenby! It will also mark the first time OHMSS has been collected in English. Octopussy and The Man with the Golden Gun were previously released by Titan in the late 1980’s.

    Octopussy and the other books in the Titan series are available for order and pre-order from Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.

  3. Jamaica Gleaner: "Chris Blackwell to expand Goldeneye"

    By Guest writer on 2004-05-12

    Jamaica Gleaner
    May 12, 2004

    MUSIC INDUSTRY and hotel mogul Chris Blackwell is to expand the Goldeneye property located in the parish of St. Mary, Wednesday Business understands.

    The original three bedroom Fleming House was the dwelling where the English thriller writer, Ian Fleming wrote 17 of his Bond books.

    The property houses a number of villas, namely Honeychile, Villa 2, Tiffany Case and Domino and Villa 3-Romanov, Solitaire and Vesper. Royal Palm is a magnificent waterfront villa where each of the bedrooms are their own inclusive spacious building.

    The plan is to expand the number of villas and to add some guest houses. Goldeneye is located in the village of Oracabessa and includes James Bond Beach which has become a venue for concerts and shows.

    Chris Blackwell also owns and runs a number of eclectic hotel resorts including Jakes, an enclave of 15 cottages created by theatrical designer Sally Henzell.

    The Caves Hotel in Negrill, 10 hand-crafted cottages designed by Greer-Ann and Bertram Saulter and Strawberry Hill, Irish Town, 12 cottages designed by Ann Hodges. Mr. Blackwell is also the creator of Island Village, a retail and entertainment centre aimed at the Ocho Rios many tourists and cruise ship visitors.

    Mr. Blackwell began Island Records in 1959 with the company recording many of Bob Marley’s classic albumss.

    by Al Edwards, Financial Editor

    Related articles:

    Thanks to [dark] for the news alert.

  4. Benson, Kiel, Join Bond Notables in Launch of 'Cinema Retro'

    By johncox on 2004-05-12


    Concept covers

    Richard “Jaws” Kiel and former James Bond continuation author Raymond Benson have joined actress Caroline Munro (The Spy Who Loved Me), author Dave Worrall (The Most Famous Car in the World), author Lee Pfeiffer (The Essential James Bond), and many other notable names from the world of 007 and the field of film criticism in the launch of Cinema Retro, an all new magazine devoted to the classic and cult movies of the ’60s and ’70s. The first issue will arrive in October 2004. Cinema Retro will be a subscription only publication.

    Details from the official Cinema Retro website:

    CINEMA RETRO: the Essential Guide to Cult and Classic Movies is a new 64-page full colour magazine devoted to those great films of the 60’s and 70’s (but we will probably be tempted to delve into the archives from the 40s and 50s too!). Its aim is to feature in each photo-infested issue:

    • A major in-depth look at a classic film or film series.
    • Cinema sirens: photos of those delicious sexy actresses whom we all long to see again.
    • Reproductions of some of the greatest poster art of all time.
    • Exclusive interviews with actors, producers and directors from films of this period.
    • Have regular columns about the films of Clint Eastwood, Alfred Hitchcock, Hammer Horror, Italian Spaghetti Westerns, great Hollywood actors and actresses – and much, much more!

    CINEMA RETRO will launch in the fall of 2004. Each issue will be a limited edition collector’s item and will not be sold on newsstands. This is not an amateur fan magazine. Rather, it is written by recognised writers in the field of film criticism as well as from the vantage point of the actors, producers, directors and technicians who were a part of this wonderful era of film making.

    With so many familiar Bond names contributing, fans can be assured that 007 will not be ignored. These Bond related articles are already scheduled for the October 2004 debut issue:

    THUNDERBALL: BEHIND THE SCENES – we’ll say it up front – our passion for the James Bond films will ensure that Mr. Kiss-Kiss-Bang-Bang has a notable presence in every issue of Cinema Retro. We don’t expect to hear many complaints, especially after 007 fans view six full pages of previously rarely seen photographs taken on location at the French chateau for the pre-credits sequence of the film. Rare shots of pilot Bill Suitor practicing flying the Bell Textron jet pack, Sean Connery holding court with the press and dining with stuntman Bob Simmons (still in drag as the deadly SPECTRE “widow”!) and many other fantastic shots designed to make even the most die-hard Bond clamour for more.

    THE “LOST” JAMES BOND FILM HOAX – a version of Moonraker shot in the 1950’s starring Dirk Bogarde and Orson Welles? A recent website appeared purporting to have uncovered rare footage and stills from this aborted effort to introduce James Bond to movie audiences years before Dr. No appeared. We examine this meticulously planned hoax that had some gullible Bond fans believing the hype of this cinematic equivalent of the Loch Ness Monster. [Read CBn’s own coverage of this story here: MOONRAKER: The “Forgotten” 1956 Film Version?]

    THE FILMS OF BARBARA BACH – Before she became Mrs. Ringo Starr, the sultry Bach raised temperatures with her eye-popping appearances in a wide range of low-budget Italian films, leading up to her memorable starring role in The Spy Who Loved Me. Tim Greaves, our resident expert on all female sex-bombs of the 1960’s and 1970’s, takes the first in-depth look at Bach’s remarkable career (and for the record, Greaves’ job is not open to other candidates!)


    From Russia With Love‘s Jan Williams will feature in an upcoming issue

    The debut issue will also feature the first contributions by Raymond Benson and Richard Kiel:

    RAYMOND BENSON ON THE BEST FILMS OF 1960 – the acclaimed author of the James Bond novels’ inaugural column for Cinema Retro is an analysis of the best films of 1960. We love these types of articles because they always stir controversy, and this one is no exception… we’re already angry with Benson for leaving out some of our personal favourites. See what you think in the first of a series of articles Raymond will provide, each analysing the films of a specific year.

    RICHARD KIEL’S TALL TALES FROM HOLLYWOOD – you know Richard from his many appearances in popular films like Silver Streak, The Spy Who Loved Me, Moonraker, Force Ten From Navarone, Pale Rider, The Longest Yard and numerous “B” sci-fi classics such as the notorious Eegah! However, Richard’s formidable physical presence is exceeded only by his talent and we’re proud to have him on board with a regular column in which he looks back on working in Hollywood during the 1960’s and ’70’s. An amusing walk down memory lane with one of the industry’s most successful character actors.

    Everyone who subscribes to the first season will be entered in a prize drawing. Upon publication of the first issue in October, three names from the list of subscribers will be drawn and announced on the official web site. Prizes to include a Limited Edition litho print of the James Bond film Thunderball, autographed by actress Martine Beswick; an autographed color photo of actress Judi Dench as ‘M’; a James Bond film novelization signed by author Raymond Benson, and a selection soundtrack compact discs and DVDs.

    For more information, visit www.cinemaretro.com (make sure your browser display settings are at 1024 x 768 for best results). Here you can see the amazing lineup of writers and contributors that will be working on the magazine, and sign up for a subscription.

    *IMPORTANT* The print run of the first issue will be based on the number of active subscribers so DO NOT wait until October. If you want to ensure that you receive this first issue of Cinema Retro, with all the Bond related articles mentioned above and much more, SUBSCRIBE NOW.

  5. The Richard Kiel CBn Interview

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-05-10

    Richard Kiel has made over 40 feature films and has appeared in over 30 television shows during his prolific career. Kiel has played everything from a love struck prehistoric caveman in “Eegah” (Mystery Science Theater viewers will know this one), to a towering space man in the classic episode of “The Twilight Zone: To Serve Man”, to a football linebacker for Burt Renolyds in 1974 hit The Longest Yard.

    But most movie goers — and certainly all Bond fans — know Richard Kiel as the indestructible “Jaws” from The Spy Who Love Me (1977) and Moonraker (1979). Not only has Kiel/Jaws appeared in two James Bond films (the only henchman to ever survive his encounters with 007), but Kiel’s hugely popular “Jaws” character is also featured in the new hit James Bond video game, Everything or Nothing, and his likeness has even been molded into a bestselling action figure–twice! Kiel, who is a favorite on the fan convention circuit, recently wrote his autobiography, “Making it BIG in the Movies,” in which he speaks in detail about his long career and his involvement on the world of 007. I recently had the pleasure of making acquaintance with the talented Richard Kiel and his wife, Diane. Mr. Kiel graciously agreed to sit down with CBn and tell us about all about his life and his deadly encounters with Bond, James Bond.

    Jaws is possibly the most memorable James Bond villain of them all; How does it feel to be have become as legendary as James Bond himself?

    Of course, it’s a wonderful feeling to be a Bond icon and to have a Jaws figure made to honor my role in Moonraker. It is also a lot of fun to be a part of the new Bond video game Everything or Nothing as well as my children and grandchildren quite enjoy it.

    How do you think a metal mouthed character who bites his victims as means of killing them could become so popular, especially amongst children?

    I think by injecting a little humor into the character and letting him have moments of vulnerability where he gets kicked out of the train window or has the construction in Egypt fall on him or when his car goes over the cliff and falls into the house in Sardenia gave the character simpatico and let him become an underdog so to speak. This gave those who tend to root for the underdog a chance to enjoy Jaws especially the children and somehow this overcame his bizarre way of disposing of his victims.

    Tell us about the teeth. Were they uncomfortable? Did you ever have any accidents with the teeth? Do you own an original pair?

    The teeth were made by a dental technician near Pinewood who was only able to forge one set out of heavy chromium or cobalt steel. The production company wanted several sets in order to have a spare or two in case one set got damaged or misplaced but the dental technician found that getting that much chrome to melt was nigh impossible and when he finally was able after much time and effort to get at least one set made he said that was it.

    They were uncomfortable but not really painful as they had a plastic liner so they wouldn’t damage your own teeth as they covered them like a boxer’s mouthpiece. The uncomfortable part was that they went up into the roof of my mouth and that combined with the taste of metal created a gagging effect.

    I was only able to keep them in for a minute or so at a time and when the director said “cut print” out they came to be washed in mouthwash and placed into a Tupperware type container filled with sterile cotton. Because they only made one pair I wasn’t able to keep a set as the “one and only set” had to be kept in a safe.

    I did borrow them one weekend to pull off what I thought would be a big practical joke. We were staying at the splendid Hotel Rafael just off the Champs Elysées near the Arch of Triumph. Our room service waiter was a very dark skinned man from India whom our three year old son affectionately called “black man.”

    The waiter was terrified of me and all the time he was setting out the food he would keep one eye on me. When he came to the door to deliver the food that Friday night I had the teeth in and when I opened the door he took one look and left his serving cart in the hall and we never saw him again. I felt very bad actually because he liked my little boy who also was very fond of him and therefore the joke backfired as it wasn’t funny to the waiter at all.

    Perhaps it was this attitude that I had about the teeth that took some of the onus off them. To me, the way that I looked in the mirror with those teeth was quite humorous. To others it was terrifying. I must admit that when Anya opened the closet door on the train in the Spy Who Loved me to find Jaws there grinning maniacally at her that it was scary even to me. I didn’t realize that, however until I saw the film later in a theater so all the time I was filming I thought I looked funny with the teeth and because of that attitude the teeth didn’t dominate the character. When Jaws is almost electrocuted by the broken lamp and then kicked out of the train window and sent crashing down the embankment he gets up and brushes off his clothes and straightens out his tie. This gave him a very human quality.

    The other choice would have been to snarl with those teeth and to show a deadly desire for revenge. I believe that my choice gave contrast to the deadly teeth side and made the character more fun and endearing to the vast majority of the audience. This caused Lewis Gilbert’s grandson to say: “Grandpa, I like Jaws. Why does he have to be a bad guy?”

    This, of course, gave Lewis and the producers the idea to turn Jaws into a good guy at the end of Moonraker.

    Do you remember what Lewis Gilbert’s initial direction was for the character? Or did he leave it up to you to create Jaws?

    I think that Lewis liked what I was doing with the character and decided to expand upon the humor. He did that with Roger’s Bond character as well. Roger was well known for his gags which normally became funny outtakes to be laughed at in the screening room only. Lewis decided to leave many humorous adlibs in and it gave Roger’s Bond a fun quality that worked very well for him.

    I remember watching the scene where the underwater Lotus car come out of the ocean and Roger rolls down the window and drops a little fish out as he drives up on the beach. Cubby Broccolli was at the screening with a journalist and we could hear him say: “That’s one of Roger’s little gags and it won’t be in the film.” My wife, Diane, who was watching and overheard the remark said to me privately: That’s funny, too bad they are going to cut it out.”

    Well, they left it in along with other Roger gags and it played well to the audience. The relationship between Jaws and Bond was enhanced, I believe, by Roger’s sense of humor. “How does that grab you?” he says as the magnet sucks me up by the teeth which is only accomplished by him smiling at me which causes me to smile back and then when he looks up it causes me to look up and that is why the magnet clamps on to my smiling teeth.

    So Lewis took Roger’s Bond and the Jaws character into a new direction and this was accepted quite well in the first film “The Spy Who Loved Me” and as a result the humor was cranked up another notch in Moonraker and Jaws was given a love interest that motivated him to change sides and become a good guy.

    Did you tailor your characterization of Jaws to work best with Roger Moore’s James Bond? For instance, would you have played the character differently had you been cast opposite Sean Connery or one of the other Bonds?

    My way of playing Jaws worked well with Roger’s keen sense of humor. Unlike some stars he did not try and stifle what I was bringing to the plate, as he is a team player. It was because of this and the director Lewis Gilbert’s recognition of the chemistry and humor that both Roger and I were bringing to the film that caused him to use much of it in the final cut.

    As far as how well this would have worked with Sean Connery and another director that is like trying to predict results from a crystal ball or tea leaves.

    I tried things like inadvertently dropping the big block on my foot at the Pyramids when Bond and Anya get away in the van. Lewis liked it and it worked for the audience who enjoyed a little bit of humor. Whether another director or actor would have allowed me to do that is a good question.

    Did you feel that the character of Jaws was simply a retread of your character Reace from Silver Streak?

    I do not know how you can keep a straight face and ask that question. In the Silver Streak I played a typical heavy who talked and carried a gun which he used to kill people. The fact that the character I played (Reace) had some gold caps did not make him anything like Jaws who killed people with his teeth

    Which movie did you enjoy making more: The Spy Who Loved Me or Moonraker?

    That would be a close call as I enjoyed working at Pinewood in Spy and going to Sardenia and Egypt but spending months in Paris and Rio wasn’t bad either. After the success of Spy and knowing the cast and crew I suppose it was even more comfortable working on the second film although everyone made me feel right at home on the first one.

    Jaws lives at the end of The Spy Who Loved Me, which is very unusual for a James Bond henchman. Had the decision already been made to have him return in the next film when this was shot?

    They shot two endings for Jaws. In one he lived and in the other he was killed by the shark. I doubt if the decision to bring Jaws back was made until there was an audience response that caused them to do so.

    Did you feel making Jaws a good guy in Moonraker was a mistake, or did you enjoy the direction the character took in this film?

    Like James Bond having a love interest and getting married in On Her Majesties Secret the storyline of Moonraker was a departure from the normal James Bond (especially with it taking place in outer space) and although that film was not as well liked by the hardcore 007 fans, it did please the crowds and is Roger Moore’s most financially successful Bond film.

    Although, like Roger I prefer The Spy Who Loved Me to Moonraker, it is the latter film that they made the Jaws figure about complete with the costume I wore when I jumped out of the airplane. I guess you can’t argue with success.

    How did you feel about Jaws getting a girlfriend in Moonraker? Did you have any creative input of this decision?

    In the first scripts Jaws was to have a 6-foot girlfriend. This was changed when they found a seven foot five inch woman to play the part of Dolly. Although this might have been good for a quick joke I felt that it detracted from the natural motivation I would have in protecting a girlfriend as a woman that big would hardly need protecting.

    I just wasn’t at all enthused about this idea. I suppose this came about from my experiences in my youth when I attended some meetings of a club called the Tip Toppers. In the club the women all had to be at least 6 foot tall and the men something like six foot six.

    I was attracted to a pretty Swedish blonde in the club who was just six feet tall and we were dating. Some of the women thought that since I was so tall that it would be more appropriate if I dated the tallest woman in the club who was about six foot five. The fact that she was six foot five wasn’t the reason I wasn’t interested in dating her as much as the fact that I just wasn’t attracted to her.

    In high school I was attracted to and dated average size girls. I think there is a natural law of nature that causes big men to like little women and vice versa. Look at how Susan Anton and Dudley Moore were attracted to one another. Years ago it was the very short Mickey Rooney who married the tall sexy Ava Gardner.

    I found that “opposites attract” like North & South poles of a magnet and that very tall women preferred shorter men and real big guys like me seemed to be more attracted to smaller woman.

    Anyway, I suggested a smaller girl as being more charming and they said how small? When I replied: “Well at least five feet.” they were shocked. “Do you think people would believe that?” they asked. My reply was that my wife Diane was only five foot one and one-half inches tall and that since we had two children already and one on the way they would have to believe it!

    This got to be a problem too as Lewis Gilbert knew an actress who was short and brought her in to meet me. The woman was terrified of me and her hands were shaking. She was also a little older than me and it just wasn’t working. I told Lewis that she seemed awfully nervous and not quite right. He said she was a good actress and would be fine.

    I was between a rock and a hard place as they were reluctantly agreeing to a shorter Dolly and yet I knew that this woman wasn’t quite the one. I approached the camera operator Alec Mills who was a good friend of Lewis and conveyed my feelings. He agreed with me and promised to mention it to Lewis.

    I am not privy to exactly what happened but the next day Lewis told me to take Diane to see a French comedy called La Carapate as there was a short French actress in it that he thought would be wonderful in the part of Dolly.

    I was impressed as this comedy the short actress plays a farmers wife who is having an affair and she is very pretty and very well built. Although the film was entirely in French it was very visual and extremely funny and Diane and I enjoyed it.

    I knew that from her performance that like my wife Diane that this actress would not be intimidated by my size and I was absolutely right. The actress, Blanche Ravalec was able to convince the audience that she fell for Jaws within seconds of meeting him and it all worked like it was supposed to.

    What was it like working with Roger Moore?

    Roger Moore is a terrific guy and a real gentleman. I remember on my first day at Pinewood that I was having trouble getting used to the English way of starting the action. In England they call the name of the actor who begins the scene while in America they say “Action!” When my name was called my natural instinct was to respond: “Yes?”

    Roger solved that by telling them to use the American “Action!”

    All actors seem to have very fond memories of Cubby Broccoli, can you share with us one of your best Cubby Broccoli stories?

    Most fans have read the true story where Cubby flew a doctor back with Diane and I because she was in the final month of pregnancy with our daughter Jennifer so I will tell you another true and amusing story.

    We were in Buenos Aires promoting either The Spy Who Loved Me or Moonraker. It was during the World Soccer playoff game which was on TV while Cubby, Dana, Diane and I were having dinner.

    Cubby liked to have coffee with his dinner and ordered some when we first sat down.

    They brought the appetizers and the salads and soup but no coffee. Cubby politely asked the waiter about the coffee and the waiter said, “It’s coming!”

    The entrees arrived but still no coffee. Cubby asked again very politely and the waiter again replied, “It’s coming!”

    Finally, we were having dessert and still no coffee for Cubby. He asked again, “Could I have my coffee please” and the waiter again said, “It’s coming!”

    When we finished dessert the coffee finally arrived. Seems in Argentina the coffee is not served until the very last thing after the meal and dessert.

    What was funny about the experience was every time there was a delay getting something in production or some other matter, Cubby would look over at me and say, “It’s coming!”

    Incidentally, Argentina won the World Cup in soccer that night and no one could sleep as the whole city celebrated all night long with firecrackers, gun shots and fireworks. It was a night that Diane and I will never forget.

    Was there ever any talk about bringing Jaws back for a 3rd film?

    No, I believe that Jaws had shot his wad at that point having been in two films back to back and having come over to help Bond save the world. Today, however, there seems to be a resurgence towards Jaws and the film Moonraker. In the last two years have attended several screenings of both the Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker around the world. They will be screening both The Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker this November at the Prince Charles Cinema in London on Friday the 19th and then Saturday the 20 they will be screening Moonraker at the Berhamstead Theater and both Blanche Ravalec (who played Jaws girlfriend Dolly) and I will be at both screenings to do a Q&A and sign books and autographs.

    In addition there is the new Jaws/Moonraker 14″ boxed figure, which immediately sold out in America and is selling out in the U.K. Finally the Everything or Nothing (EON) video game just came out in February and it features Jaws in a lot of new action never before seen in any film.

    Looking at all this interest in Jaws I believe that it is now time for him to do a cameo. It would require some skillful writing on the part of the writers because of the change in Jaws’ character but it could be a lot of fun.

    What do you think about Jaws being featured in the hit video game ‘Everything or Nothing’? Did you have any involvement in this or an opinion on the final product?

    I have been sent by Electronic Arts (EA) the makers of the game to Dallas, Texas, Tokyo, Japan, Amsterdam, Holland and N.Y.C. to publicize and promote this new video game. In my opinion it is one of the best video games ever made as it is like a movie on to itself with real actors like Pierce Brosnan, William DaFoe, Heidi Klum and Shannon Elizabeth doing the voices and Maya doing the theme song. There is a Japanese actress in it as well, Misaki Ito, as Bond is huge in Japan.

    The graphics are fantastic and there is a story written by Bond writer Bruce Feirstein. Like I said it’s like a movie with great action including car and motorcycle chases and I like what Jaws does with his character.

    Did you have any input – approval of likeness etc – on the new Sideshow Collectables Jaws action figure?

    No, but they did a great job and I am very happy with the likeness.

    Which movie do you get more fan mail from, The Spy Who Love Me or Moonraker? Or do fans simply remember you as Jaws? Have you received and “unusual fan mail”?

    Moonraker sold a lot more tickets and it naturally follows that the most fans identify me with that film along with Spy. At autograph shows we sell more Moonraker photos as well. There is no way to break down the fan mail except to say that we get more requests for Moonraker photos.

    Do you ever regret becoming part of the Bond world? With all the conventions and Bond “geeks” out there, do you ever get tired of being “Jaws”?

    No, not at all. I enjoy doing the conventions and meeting the fans. Unlike some TV shows or movies the Bond fans are not “geeks” although maybe one out of a thousands fancies himself as Bond and comes wearing a tux (whew!). I get more young men who grew up with braces who identified with Jaws. People love to have their picture taken with me pretending to smash their head and women seem to enjoy a regular picture with me because they feel very petite and feminine.

    Are you a Bond fan yourself–when did fandom strike you? If you are a fan, who do you currently see being the next James Bond?

    I was a Bond fan before playing Jaws. I think that Pierce Brosnan has made a very good Bond. Of course, when the time comes for Pierce to move on there will be another actor anxious to step into the role.

    Can you tell us about some of your other acting rolls apart from Jaws? Which roll got you started in acting? Which rolls were key in your acting career? And which roll did you enjoy the most?

    I was in The Longest Yard (aka: The Mean Machine) with Burt Reynolds. Force 10 From Navaronne with Harrison Ford & Robert Shaw. Happy Gilmore with Adam Sandler. Cannonball Run II with Burt Reynolds where Jacke Chan played my co-driver, driving one of the cars in the race. I got started in American television playing lead heavies in shows like “Klondike” where I played a bare-knuckle or “The Man From U.N.C.L.E.” where I played a henchman not unlike Jaws but without the teeth and I talked.

    The roles that were key to my career were The Wild Wild West television series where I played Voltaire with Michael Dunne’s Dr. Loveless and the movie The Longest Yard where I played one of the maniacal convicts who got to beat up the guards playing football in the prison. The audiences around the world loved my line, “I think I broke his f–ing neck!”

    I enjoyed making that film as it was the one where I met my wife Diane. Another film that was a lot of fun to make was They Went That-A-Way & That-A-Way with Tim Conway. We also enjoyed making L’ Humanoid with Barbara Bach and Corrine Clery as the film took us to Rome where we filmed at the famous Cinecitta Studio and on to Israel where we filmed moon valley effects by the Red Sea and with the help of matte shots placed a futuristic city around the Kennedy Memorial which I walk out of. In both countries we worked a five-day week and had a car and driver to take us sight seeing on the weekend. I had my wife Diane and my then two older children with me and we brought over my mother and my sister’s two girls so they could enjoy the experience with us.

    What inspired you to write your autobiography, Making It BIG In The Movies? And speaking of making it BIG just how tall are you anyway?

    I decided to write my life story and how I broke into acting because that is the most asked question especially by hopefuls who believe that they want to be an actor. Breaking into the movies and carving out a successful career and a good living wasn’t an easy accomplishment. Many would-be actors and actresses fail in the attempt and you see the sad reality in young girls and young men who stand on Sunset Boulevard hoping to be picked up and earn a few dollars for rent and food so they can keep trying to make it big in show business rather than go back home as failures.

    I did a lot of things that helped me become a success and I thought if I could pass them on along with the reality of how tough it was then perhaps it could save a lot of heartache as many people reading my book would realize that it took me 17 years to finally do that first James Bond movie and seemingly become an overnight success!

    If you read my autobiography you discover that I had to do many innovative things and to have a regular job in between so I could finance the trade ads and the publicity and acting coach expenses. Many of these stories are not only useful but also very interesting and sometimes humorous making for a good read.

    I am actually 7 foot and and one-half inches tall. I say Seven two because it’s easier. Unlike some tall skinny guys I am really “big” weighing around 350 pounds. Being “big” wasn’t enough however and that’s why you need to read my book.

    Well, I’ll defiantly have to read your book now! Thank you very much, Mr. Kiel, for spending your time with CBn today.

    Thanks for all the time and good questions and see you soon.


    To discuss this interview visit this thread on the CBn forums. Thank you to Richard Kiel for all his time and great stories.


    (You can pick up a signed copy of Kiel’s autobiography, “Making it BIG in the Movies”, from his web-site RichardKiel.com where you can also put in a request for a signed photo of him–plenty of picture choices.)

  6. Gardner Bond Novels Now Available in Japanese

    By johncox on 2004-05-10

    Nine original James Bond continuation novels by John Gardner are now available in Japanese editions with very intriguing cover art. The nine titles are: Licence Renewed, For Special Services, Icebreaker, Role of Honour, Nobody Lives Forever, No Deals Mr. Bond, Scorpius, Win Lose or Die, and Brokenclaw.

    The books can all be ordered from Amazon.co.jp or via this helpful website.



    These books join Gardner’s two film novelizations, Licence To Kill and GoldenEye, which have long been available in Japan.

    Licence Renewed, For Special Services, and Icebreaker were recently reprinted in the UK in an omnibus edition [see: At Last! Gardner Omnibus Sees Publication]. The Gardner books remain out-of-print in the United States.

  7. Last Call for BCW 007!

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-05-07

    Calling all Bond fans! We are now just weeks away from the 7th annual Bond Collectors Weekend which this year will be held in Miami and Key West, FL. Organizer Matt Sherman has confirmed there are still a few open spots available. So if you want to “Bond” with other 007 fans, meet some of your fellow CBNers, and visit locations from Goldfinger, THUNDERBALL, Licence To Kill, Nobody Lives Forever, and The Man From Barbarossa, act now!

    Here are the details on “BCW 007” as first reported on CBn back in February.

    Bond Collectors’ Weekend 007 Miami
    Friday – Sunday, June 4-6, 2004

    This is the best tour of them all, lasting three days, with of course most of the 007 locales on Saturday and Sunday morning,” says Matt Sherman, Bond Weekend 7 organizer. “We are lucky to be working closely with researchers and those who were in Key West during filming. We are hitting twice as many locations as we saw in New Orleans, San Francisco or Las Vegas and have close to 50 points of interest documented to date with some surprises.

    BCW Productions is organizing their seventh Bond Collectors’ Weekend. The BCWs are variety events attended by 007 Fans from around the world. The events are put together for Bond fans to visit James Bond locations, check out movie vehicles, and meet celebrities in an intimate setting (no Celebes have been confirmed yet for BCW7, but stay tune for further information).

    Weekend 007 features an overnight in Key West and theme tours of 40 book and film points of interest from Goldfinger, Thunderball, Licence To Kill, Nobody Lives Forever, and The Man From Barbarossa.

    The seventh annual Bond Collectors’ Weekend is set for Miami, Florida. Friday through Sunday, June 4-6. Attendance is limited to 50 fans… so sign up quick! Your BCW package will include:

    • Hotel stay for three days/two nights single or double occupancy in Miami (Holiday Inn Express Miami Lakes) on Friday and Key West (Best Western Key Ambassador) on Saturday
    • Breakfast each morning
    • All guided tour admissions
    • Dinner Friday night at our party
    • All ground transportation and gratuities
    • 007th weekend commemorative gifts, themed prizes, and more!

    Friday June 4, 2004

    8:00 AM: (For those arriving early) Meet fellow fans and collectors from around the US and Canada. Your stay includes complimentary breakfast each day, poolside.
    9:30 AM: Guided tour of downtown Miami, Virginia Key, Cape Florida Lighthouse and Biscayne National Park.
    12 Noon: Group luncheon on Key Biscayne. Take a dip with us in the Atlantic after lunch.
    2:00 PM: Miami tour including fashion and entertainment centers Coral Gables, Coconut Grove, and Bal Harbour.
    5:00 PM: Dine at Joe’s Stone Crab, the “Bill’s On The Beach” of Ian Fleming’s Goldfinger. (Nominal charge for those able to attend.)
    8:00 PM – 2:00 AM: Nonstop TUXEDO / COSTUME / COME AS YOU ARE, 007 PARTY with games, prizes and themed food and drink at hotel. Sip martinis and dance the night away with couple and single Bond fans and friends.

    Saturday June 5, 2004

    7:00 AM: Breakfast at hotel
    8:00 AM: Visit beautiful Marathon and the Seven Mile Bridge (Licence To Kill – Sanchez escapes!) and more than 25 points of interest from the 007 books and films! Enjoy historic Key West’s Lighthouse, Old Town, Southernmost Point and more on our guided tour plus Bond, Bond, Bond!
    8:12 PM: Catch Sunset Celebration (as Bond did in Nobody Lives Forever) on the Gulf of Mexico at Mallory Square before heading for local nightlife. Shop world famous Duval Street. Your overnight stay is at the Key Ambassador on seven resort acres overlooking the Atlantic.

    Sunday June 6, 2004

    7:00 AM: Breakfast together at Key Ambassador Resort.
    8:00 AM: Tour the Florida Keys, South Beach and Miami’s Art Deco district including more movie and book locations from Goldfinger, Thunderball, and Licence To Kill.
    3:00 PM: Depart Sunday for home or stay late for shopping, Bonding with the gang and dinner at Bayside Marketplace.

    So to quote Roger Moore in Octopussy

    I’ll see you in Miami.

    Payment Info:

    • Single Occupancy (One 007): $389.50
    • Double Occupancy (Two 007s, ask about roommate matching): $565.50 per couple
    • Extra child staying in room/on tours (Junior 007s 13 and under): $160.00, space permitting (one child and one adult in one room are charged couples’ price)
    • Book your BCW 7 trip with payment before March 15, 2004 and get $10 off per person by mentioned CommanderBond.net
    • Airfare is up to YOU to arrange and pay for. For airfare discounts from Los Angeles, Chicago, & New York call toll free 1 (866) FLY-4FUN (359-4386) and ask for Jim, the “007 Weekend Agent”.
    • BCW packages for locals (without hotel stay) are available for $200 per person.
    • Late and early hotel nights are available through BCW Productions.
    • Upgrade to a suite on Friday night (Holiday Inn Express Miami Lakes) for only $25 more
    • Stay in a suite with Jacuzzi (Holiday Inn Express Miami Lakes) for just $65 more (single or double occupancy)!
    • Please make checks or money order payable to “AllSpies Productions”
    • Note on your check: “007th Weekend Registration”. Space is limited so sign up SOON!
    • And send to: ALLSPIES PRODUCTIONS
      2711 NW 42 PL
      GAINESVILLE FL 32605

    Questions?

    Matt & Janine Sherman
    352.372.5094 (USA)
    [email protected]

    The Fine Print: BCW 7 itinerary subject to change. Deposits on weekends are nonrefundable.

  8. Tarantino's "Casino Royale" Appears in Industry Production Chart

    By johncox on 2004-05-07

    Filmmaker Quentin Tarantino (Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill) has for years expressed a desire to make a faithful adaptation of Ian Fleming’s first James Bond novel Casino Royale. Ideas the director has floated in the past have included shooting the movie in black and white, and even using voice over narration in order to incorporate Fleming’s text. Most recently Tarantino has said he would cast the potentially ousted Pierce Brosnan as his Bond, and Uma Thurman as Bond Girl Vesper Lynd.

    Brosnan has endorsed Tarantino’s approach (which should come as no surprise considering how badly he wants one last shot at playing 007), but Eon Productions and MGM have remained publicly quite on the matter, saying only that Bond 21 is on track for a 2005 release, and that decisions as to who will direct, and who will play 007, will be made “in the next few months.” [See: MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21]

    But now Quentin’s Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” is appearing in a respected online movie industry production database, Production Weekly (a subscription service), as a “development” project under Tarantino’s A Band Apart production company banner.


    “CASINO ROYALE” Feature Film
    A BAND APART
    7966 Beverly Blvd., 3rd Fl., Los Angeles, CA 90048
    PHONE – [edited for privacy] FAX – [edited for privacy]
    STATUS – Development
    DIRECTOR: Quentin Tarantino CAST: Pierce Brosnan
    Sir James Bond is enjoying his retirement when four international agents press him into service again in hopes of smashing SMERSH and Topple LeChiffre at the baccarat tables. Bond is taken in by Agent Mimi (alias Lady Fiona McTarry) who immediately falls in love with him. Bond’s illegitimate daughter, Mata Bond, whose mother was the late Mata Hari, is going to help out. The current agent using the Bond name, Cooper, has his hands full, despite his assistance by beautiful secretary, Moneypenny. 007’s nephew Jimmy Bond is supposedly incompetent. Bond, hoping to clear his name from its current low repute, hires Evelyn Tremble to meet LeChiffre at the gambling tables at Casino Royale. The world’s richest agent, Vesper Lynd, helps convince Tremble to masquerade as 007.


    Does this mean the Tarantino “Casino” is going ahead? Might we get another “Battle of the Bonds” in 2005?

    Not likely.

    Eon/MGM now hold the rights to Casino Royale, awarded to them after the 1997 court battle with Sony Pictures (who now own Columbia, the studio that made the 1967 Casino Royale with David Niven). Despite the presumption of the listing, A Band Apart cannot adapt the book, remake the ’67 film, nor even use the character of James Bond in anyway. Eon and MGM hold all cinematic rights to the character of James Bond. Period.

    It’s more likely that Tarantino (who is never press-shy) is putting his ideas out there in the hopes of swaying Eon into a co-production of some kind. It’s also possible that the listing was generated by an over-zealous fan, or an industry professional who picked up on the numerous Quentin/Casino stories and included the listing without realizing that the director doesn’t actually own the rights. Further suspicion is raised by the fact that the plot outline on this listing is that of the 1967 farce — hardly the faithful adaptation of Fleming that Tarantino has spoken of in the past.

    Nevertheless, with two such headline-grabbing names as Quentin Tarantino and James Bond, no doubt the rumors will continue. But unless Eon announces a co-production with the famous filmmaker, Bond fans should not expect to see Quentin Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” anytime soon.


    Related articles:

  9. Tarantino’s Bond Bid

    To discuss this news visit this thread in the CBn Forums.

  • MGM Postpones Meeting, Sale Talks Heat Up

    By Guest writer on 2004-05-06

    The New York Times
    May 6, 2004

    Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. said yesterday that it was postponing its annual meeting to June 29 from next Wednesday because it was “considering strategic alternatives.”

    MGM is in discussions about a sale to a group that includes the Sony Corporation and two private equity firms, the Texas Pacific Group and Providence Equity Partners, for about $5 billion.

    MGM declined to comment, but people close to the discussions said that Sony and the equity firms were near an agreement for exclusive rights to review the company’s books.

    That agreement, if concluded, would expire in about two weeks.

    Should the negotiations lead to a sale, the terms could possibly be worked out by the June 29 meeting.

    Still, MGM’s agreement with Sony would not preclude other bidders from making an offer. No other serious buyers, however, appear close to making a bid, though Time Warner and General Electric, through its NBC division, are said to be considering offers.

    The Sony-led alliance has been described as delicate because the private equity firms would put up most of the financing, but Sony would effectively have management control of the company.

    That would not involve the uncertainties of running a movie company because Sony intends to shut the film production operation and simply use the MGM library as a source of cash flow.

    MGM’s stock has jumped since it was reported in April that the controlling shareholder, Kirk Kerkorian, might be close to completing a sale.

    Shares of MGM rose 9 cents yesterday, to $21.02.

    While MGM has held talks with numerous suitors over the years, the talks with Sony appear to have gained more traction than others. Indeed, MGM’s public statement yesterday about the possibility of an agreement seemed to provide a sense of seriousness to the talks and to put pressure on the company to reach a deal.

    The talks come as MGM’s chief executive, Alex Yemenidjian, has turned around the business, which only five years ago was losing money. He reversed that trend and turned the business into a cash cow by focusing much of the company’s efforts on generating profits from its 4,000-title library of films and paring its movie productions to focus on only its most profitable and less risky franchise films, like the James Bond series.

    Still, the bidding team has had tenuous relationships with one another and negotiations with Mr. Kerkorian are not easy either.

    By GERALDINE FABRIKANT and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
    The New York Times

    Related articles:

  • More "GoldenEye: Rogue Agent" Details Emerge

    By Matt Weston on 2004-05-06

    Following EA’s press release announcing the current status of their new game, as well as its new title, Gamespot has interviewed Chris Plummer, the senior producer at Electronic Arts, who divulged even more information about the upcoming game.

    GoldenEye: Rogue Agent will take the Bond franchise into its darkest territory yet when players take control of an agent tossed out of Her Majesty’s Secret Service for reckless brutality.

    The game begins during Bond’s assault at Fort Knox against Operation: Grandslam, Auric Goldfinger’s infamous plan to set off a nuclear bomb within the gold suppository. As an aspiring 00-agent, your character is working alongside James Bond to put an end to Goldfinger’s scheme. However, when you get a little over-enthusiastic about the job in hand, MI6 dismisses you for being reckless.

    After being cast out from the organisation, you find your way to working for Auric Goldfinger himself, whereupon your character receives the physical deformity that results in your monikor, GoldenEye. EA’s press release mentioned the golden synthetic eye the character possesses, but never touched on how it became acquired.

    The rumoured working title for the game that was a precursor to GoldenEye 2, was GoldenEye: Dr. No vs. Goldfinger, which has its basis in the latest news to surface, which is that there is a bitter battle between the two supervillains for control of the criminal underworld. The battle hits hits peak when your character gets caught in the crossfire and loses his eye, which is then replaced with a synthetic one. GoldenEye then embarks on revenge against Dr. Julius No, the man responsible for his physical deformity. From there, your goal as GoldenEye, is to rise to become the ultimate Bond villain.

    Moving away from the storyline, Plummer revealed that the game has been in development for a year, whilst the idea was formed about a year-and-a-half ago. The game has been in full production for several months, aiming for a November 2004 release.

    Plummer revealed that the general idea is to create a Bond game that will “live up to the legacy” of Rare’s 1997 masterpiece of the same name, and ultimately deliver the best first-person shooter experience on consoles. Plummer hopes that the new game will bring everything people loved about the original GoldenEye but updated for the latest generation of consoles.

    Like Everything or Nothing, GoldenEye: Rogue Agent will employ Hollywood talent behind-the-scenes, including legendary Bond production designer, Ken Adams, Academy Award-winning costume designer Kym Barret and Final Fantasy: The Movie character artist René Morel. Further, the game will contain a plethora of classic Bond characters, including Dr. No, Goldfinger, Oddjob, Xenia Onatopp and Pussy Galore, shaking and stirring the Bond mythology.

    As for the all-important aspect of weapons within a first-person shooter, Plummer says that GoldenEye: Rogue Agent will contain a number of real-world weapons, in addition to weapons that have been designed specifically for the game. Grenades, especially, will play an integral part in the game, says Plummer. They are “more gadget-like” and will allow players to take out enemies in “more creative ways”. Your player will also carry around a special weapon, which is, as Plummer puts it, “your baby”. As you continue through the game, you can add to and customise your own weapon. The game will also employ a brand new hand-to-hand combat fighting system.

    Like the original GoldenEye, split-screen multiplayer will be an important part of the new EA game (in fact, work on the multiplayer aspect began before the single-player missions). The game will feature more multiplayer levels than single-player levels. There will also be on-line play for the PlayStation 2. No word on the rumour that surfaced last month that the game would utilise X-Box Live, however.

    Plummer outlined EA’s plans to unveil the game at the upcoming E3 convention, where two missions will be displayed: the aforementioned opening sequence of Operation: Grandslam (from the PS2 version) as well as multiplayer map in the form of Drax’s Moonraker launch complex (from the X-Box version).

    Most impressive is the very first footage of the first-person shooter in action, which appears very reminiscent of Rare’s original game. The footage, as well as the interview with Chris Plummer, can be viewed here.