CommanderBond.net
  1. The Richard Kiel CBn Interview

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-05-10

    Richard Kiel has made over 40 feature films and has appeared in over 30 television shows during his prolific career. Kiel has played everything from a love struck prehistoric caveman in “Eegah” (Mystery Science Theater viewers will know this one), to a towering space man in the classic episode of “The Twilight Zone: To Serve Man”, to a football linebacker for Burt Renolyds in 1974 hit The Longest Yard.

    But most movie goers — and certainly all Bond fans — know Richard Kiel as the indestructible “Jaws” from The Spy Who Love Me (1977) and Moonraker (1979). Not only has Kiel/Jaws appeared in two James Bond films (the only henchman to ever survive his encounters with 007), but Kiel’s hugely popular “Jaws” character is also featured in the new hit James Bond video game, Everything or Nothing, and his likeness has even been molded into a bestselling action figure–twice! Kiel, who is a favorite on the fan convention circuit, recently wrote his autobiography, “Making it BIG in the Movies,” in which he speaks in detail about his long career and his involvement on the world of 007. I recently had the pleasure of making acquaintance with the talented Richard Kiel and his wife, Diane. Mr. Kiel graciously agreed to sit down with CBn and tell us about all about his life and his deadly encounters with Bond, James Bond.

    Jaws is possibly the most memorable James Bond villain of them all; How does it feel to be have become as legendary as James Bond himself?

    Of course, it’s a wonderful feeling to be a Bond icon and to have a Jaws figure made to honor my role in Moonraker. It is also a lot of fun to be a part of the new Bond video game Everything or Nothing as well as my children and grandchildren quite enjoy it.

    How do you think a metal mouthed character who bites his victims as means of killing them could become so popular, especially amongst children?

    I think by injecting a little humor into the character and letting him have moments of vulnerability where he gets kicked out of the train window or has the construction in Egypt fall on him or when his car goes over the cliff and falls into the house in Sardenia gave the character simpatico and let him become an underdog so to speak. This gave those who tend to root for the underdog a chance to enjoy Jaws especially the children and somehow this overcame his bizarre way of disposing of his victims.

    Tell us about the teeth. Were they uncomfortable? Did you ever have any accidents with the teeth? Do you own an original pair?

    The teeth were made by a dental technician near Pinewood who was only able to forge one set out of heavy chromium or cobalt steel. The production company wanted several sets in order to have a spare or two in case one set got damaged or misplaced but the dental technician found that getting that much chrome to melt was nigh impossible and when he finally was able after much time and effort to get at least one set made he said that was it.

    They were uncomfortable but not really painful as they had a plastic liner so they wouldn’t damage your own teeth as they covered them like a boxer’s mouthpiece. The uncomfortable part was that they went up into the roof of my mouth and that combined with the taste of metal created a gagging effect.

    I was only able to keep them in for a minute or so at a time and when the director said “cut print” out they came to be washed in mouthwash and placed into a Tupperware type container filled with sterile cotton. Because they only made one pair I wasn’t able to keep a set as the “one and only set” had to be kept in a safe.

    I did borrow them one weekend to pull off what I thought would be a big practical joke. We were staying at the splendid Hotel Rafael just off the Champs Elysées near the Arch of Triumph. Our room service waiter was a very dark skinned man from India whom our three year old son affectionately called “black man.”

    The waiter was terrified of me and all the time he was setting out the food he would keep one eye on me. When he came to the door to deliver the food that Friday night I had the teeth in and when I opened the door he took one look and left his serving cart in the hall and we never saw him again. I felt very bad actually because he liked my little boy who also was very fond of him and therefore the joke backfired as it wasn’t funny to the waiter at all.

    Perhaps it was this attitude that I had about the teeth that took some of the onus off them. To me, the way that I looked in the mirror with those teeth was quite humorous. To others it was terrifying. I must admit that when Anya opened the closet door on the train in the Spy Who Loved me to find Jaws there grinning maniacally at her that it was scary even to me. I didn’t realize that, however until I saw the film later in a theater so all the time I was filming I thought I looked funny with the teeth and because of that attitude the teeth didn’t dominate the character. When Jaws is almost electrocuted by the broken lamp and then kicked out of the train window and sent crashing down the embankment he gets up and brushes off his clothes and straightens out his tie. This gave him a very human quality.

    The other choice would have been to snarl with those teeth and to show a deadly desire for revenge. I believe that my choice gave contrast to the deadly teeth side and made the character more fun and endearing to the vast majority of the audience. This caused Lewis Gilbert’s grandson to say: “Grandpa, I like Jaws. Why does he have to be a bad guy?”

    This, of course, gave Lewis and the producers the idea to turn Jaws into a good guy at the end of Moonraker.

    Do you remember what Lewis Gilbert’s initial direction was for the character? Or did he leave it up to you to create Jaws?

    I think that Lewis liked what I was doing with the character and decided to expand upon the humor. He did that with Roger’s Bond character as well. Roger was well known for his gags which normally became funny outtakes to be laughed at in the screening room only. Lewis decided to leave many humorous adlibs in and it gave Roger’s Bond a fun quality that worked very well for him.

    I remember watching the scene where the underwater Lotus car come out of the ocean and Roger rolls down the window and drops a little fish out as he drives up on the beach. Cubby Broccolli was at the screening with a journalist and we could hear him say: “That’s one of Roger’s little gags and it won’t be in the film.” My wife, Diane, who was watching and overheard the remark said to me privately: That’s funny, too bad they are going to cut it out.”

    Well, they left it in along with other Roger gags and it played well to the audience. The relationship between Jaws and Bond was enhanced, I believe, by Roger’s sense of humor. “How does that grab you?” he says as the magnet sucks me up by the teeth which is only accomplished by him smiling at me which causes me to smile back and then when he looks up it causes me to look up and that is why the magnet clamps on to my smiling teeth.

    So Lewis took Roger’s Bond and the Jaws character into a new direction and this was accepted quite well in the first film “The Spy Who Loved Me” and as a result the humor was cranked up another notch in Moonraker and Jaws was given a love interest that motivated him to change sides and become a good guy.

    Did you tailor your characterization of Jaws to work best with Roger Moore’s James Bond? For instance, would you have played the character differently had you been cast opposite Sean Connery or one of the other Bonds?

    My way of playing Jaws worked well with Roger’s keen sense of humor. Unlike some stars he did not try and stifle what I was bringing to the plate, as he is a team player. It was because of this and the director Lewis Gilbert’s recognition of the chemistry and humor that both Roger and I were bringing to the film that caused him to use much of it in the final cut.

    As far as how well this would have worked with Sean Connery and another director that is like trying to predict results from a crystal ball or tea leaves.

    I tried things like inadvertently dropping the big block on my foot at the Pyramids when Bond and Anya get away in the van. Lewis liked it and it worked for the audience who enjoyed a little bit of humor. Whether another director or actor would have allowed me to do that is a good question.

    Did you feel that the character of Jaws was simply a retread of your character Reace from Silver Streak?

    I do not know how you can keep a straight face and ask that question. In the Silver Streak I played a typical heavy who talked and carried a gun which he used to kill people. The fact that the character I played (Reace) had some gold caps did not make him anything like Jaws who killed people with his teeth

    Which movie did you enjoy making more: The Spy Who Loved Me or Moonraker?

    That would be a close call as I enjoyed working at Pinewood in Spy and going to Sardenia and Egypt but spending months in Paris and Rio wasn’t bad either. After the success of Spy and knowing the cast and crew I suppose it was even more comfortable working on the second film although everyone made me feel right at home on the first one.

    Jaws lives at the end of The Spy Who Loved Me, which is very unusual for a James Bond henchman. Had the decision already been made to have him return in the next film when this was shot?

    They shot two endings for Jaws. In one he lived and in the other he was killed by the shark. I doubt if the decision to bring Jaws back was made until there was an audience response that caused them to do so.

    Did you feel making Jaws a good guy in Moonraker was a mistake, or did you enjoy the direction the character took in this film?

    Like James Bond having a love interest and getting married in On Her Majesties Secret the storyline of Moonraker was a departure from the normal James Bond (especially with it taking place in outer space) and although that film was not as well liked by the hardcore 007 fans, it did please the crowds and is Roger Moore’s most financially successful Bond film.

    Although, like Roger I prefer The Spy Who Loved Me to Moonraker, it is the latter film that they made the Jaws figure about complete with the costume I wore when I jumped out of the airplane. I guess you can’t argue with success.

    How did you feel about Jaws getting a girlfriend in Moonraker? Did you have any creative input of this decision?

    In the first scripts Jaws was to have a 6-foot girlfriend. This was changed when they found a seven foot five inch woman to play the part of Dolly. Although this might have been good for a quick joke I felt that it detracted from the natural motivation I would have in protecting a girlfriend as a woman that big would hardly need protecting.

    I just wasn’t at all enthused about this idea. I suppose this came about from my experiences in my youth when I attended some meetings of a club called the Tip Toppers. In the club the women all had to be at least 6 foot tall and the men something like six foot six.

    I was attracted to a pretty Swedish blonde in the club who was just six feet tall and we were dating. Some of the women thought that since I was so tall that it would be more appropriate if I dated the tallest woman in the club who was about six foot five. The fact that she was six foot five wasn’t the reason I wasn’t interested in dating her as much as the fact that I just wasn’t attracted to her.

    In high school I was attracted to and dated average size girls. I think there is a natural law of nature that causes big men to like little women and vice versa. Look at how Susan Anton and Dudley Moore were attracted to one another. Years ago it was the very short Mickey Rooney who married the tall sexy Ava Gardner.

    I found that “opposites attract” like North & South poles of a magnet and that very tall women preferred shorter men and real big guys like me seemed to be more attracted to smaller woman.

    Anyway, I suggested a smaller girl as being more charming and they said how small? When I replied: “Well at least five feet.” they were shocked. “Do you think people would believe that?” they asked. My reply was that my wife Diane was only five foot one and one-half inches tall and that since we had two children already and one on the way they would have to believe it!

    This got to be a problem too as Lewis Gilbert knew an actress who was short and brought her in to meet me. The woman was terrified of me and her hands were shaking. She was also a little older than me and it just wasn’t working. I told Lewis that she seemed awfully nervous and not quite right. He said she was a good actress and would be fine.

    I was between a rock and a hard place as they were reluctantly agreeing to a shorter Dolly and yet I knew that this woman wasn’t quite the one. I approached the camera operator Alec Mills who was a good friend of Lewis and conveyed my feelings. He agreed with me and promised to mention it to Lewis.

    I am not privy to exactly what happened but the next day Lewis told me to take Diane to see a French comedy called La Carapate as there was a short French actress in it that he thought would be wonderful in the part of Dolly.

    I was impressed as this comedy the short actress plays a farmers wife who is having an affair and she is very pretty and very well built. Although the film was entirely in French it was very visual and extremely funny and Diane and I enjoyed it.

    I knew that from her performance that like my wife Diane that this actress would not be intimidated by my size and I was absolutely right. The actress, Blanche Ravalec was able to convince the audience that she fell for Jaws within seconds of meeting him and it all worked like it was supposed to.

    What was it like working with Roger Moore?

    Roger Moore is a terrific guy and a real gentleman. I remember on my first day at Pinewood that I was having trouble getting used to the English way of starting the action. In England they call the name of the actor who begins the scene while in America they say “Action!” When my name was called my natural instinct was to respond: “Yes?”

    Roger solved that by telling them to use the American “Action!”

    All actors seem to have very fond memories of Cubby Broccoli, can you share with us one of your best Cubby Broccoli stories?

    Most fans have read the true story where Cubby flew a doctor back with Diane and I because she was in the final month of pregnancy with our daughter Jennifer so I will tell you another true and amusing story.

    We were in Buenos Aires promoting either The Spy Who Loved Me or Moonraker. It was during the World Soccer playoff game which was on TV while Cubby, Dana, Diane and I were having dinner.

    Cubby liked to have coffee with his dinner and ordered some when we first sat down.

    They brought the appetizers and the salads and soup but no coffee. Cubby politely asked the waiter about the coffee and the waiter said, “It’s coming!”

    The entrees arrived but still no coffee. Cubby asked again very politely and the waiter again replied, “It’s coming!”

    Finally, we were having dessert and still no coffee for Cubby. He asked again, “Could I have my coffee please” and the waiter again said, “It’s coming!”

    When we finished dessert the coffee finally arrived. Seems in Argentina the coffee is not served until the very last thing after the meal and dessert.

    What was funny about the experience was every time there was a delay getting something in production or some other matter, Cubby would look over at me and say, “It’s coming!”

    Incidentally, Argentina won the World Cup in soccer that night and no one could sleep as the whole city celebrated all night long with firecrackers, gun shots and fireworks. It was a night that Diane and I will never forget.

    Was there ever any talk about bringing Jaws back for a 3rd film?

    No, I believe that Jaws had shot his wad at that point having been in two films back to back and having come over to help Bond save the world. Today, however, there seems to be a resurgence towards Jaws and the film Moonraker. In the last two years have attended several screenings of both the Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker around the world. They will be screening both The Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker this November at the Prince Charles Cinema in London on Friday the 19th and then Saturday the 20 they will be screening Moonraker at the Berhamstead Theater and both Blanche Ravalec (who played Jaws girlfriend Dolly) and I will be at both screenings to do a Q&A and sign books and autographs.

    In addition there is the new Jaws/Moonraker 14″ boxed figure, which immediately sold out in America and is selling out in the U.K. Finally the Everything or Nothing (EON) video game just came out in February and it features Jaws in a lot of new action never before seen in any film.

    Looking at all this interest in Jaws I believe that it is now time for him to do a cameo. It would require some skillful writing on the part of the writers because of the change in Jaws’ character but it could be a lot of fun.

    What do you think about Jaws being featured in the hit video game ‘Everything or Nothing’? Did you have any involvement in this or an opinion on the final product?

    I have been sent by Electronic Arts (EA) the makers of the game to Dallas, Texas, Tokyo, Japan, Amsterdam, Holland and N.Y.C. to publicize and promote this new video game. In my opinion it is one of the best video games ever made as it is like a movie on to itself with real actors like Pierce Brosnan, William DaFoe, Heidi Klum and Shannon Elizabeth doing the voices and Maya doing the theme song. There is a Japanese actress in it as well, Misaki Ito, as Bond is huge in Japan.

    The graphics are fantastic and there is a story written by Bond writer Bruce Feirstein. Like I said it’s like a movie with great action including car and motorcycle chases and I like what Jaws does with his character.

    Did you have any input – approval of likeness etc – on the new Sideshow Collectables Jaws action figure?

    No, but they did a great job and I am very happy with the likeness.

    Which movie do you get more fan mail from, The Spy Who Love Me or Moonraker? Or do fans simply remember you as Jaws? Have you received and “unusual fan mail”?

    Moonraker sold a lot more tickets and it naturally follows that the most fans identify me with that film along with Spy. At autograph shows we sell more Moonraker photos as well. There is no way to break down the fan mail except to say that we get more requests for Moonraker photos.

    Do you ever regret becoming part of the Bond world? With all the conventions and Bond “geeks” out there, do you ever get tired of being “Jaws”?

    No, not at all. I enjoy doing the conventions and meeting the fans. Unlike some TV shows or movies the Bond fans are not “geeks” although maybe one out of a thousands fancies himself as Bond and comes wearing a tux (whew!). I get more young men who grew up with braces who identified with Jaws. People love to have their picture taken with me pretending to smash their head and women seem to enjoy a regular picture with me because they feel very petite and feminine.

    Are you a Bond fan yourself–when did fandom strike you? If you are a fan, who do you currently see being the next James Bond?

    I was a Bond fan before playing Jaws. I think that Pierce Brosnan has made a very good Bond. Of course, when the time comes for Pierce to move on there will be another actor anxious to step into the role.

    Can you tell us about some of your other acting rolls apart from Jaws? Which roll got you started in acting? Which rolls were key in your acting career? And which roll did you enjoy the most?

    I was in The Longest Yard (aka: The Mean Machine) with Burt Reynolds. Force 10 From Navaronne with Harrison Ford & Robert Shaw. Happy Gilmore with Adam Sandler. Cannonball Run II with Burt Reynolds where Jacke Chan played my co-driver, driving one of the cars in the race. I got started in American television playing lead heavies in shows like “Klondike” where I played a bare-knuckle or “The Man From U.N.C.L.E.” where I played a henchman not unlike Jaws but without the teeth and I talked.

    The roles that were key to my career were The Wild Wild West television series where I played Voltaire with Michael Dunne’s Dr. Loveless and the movie The Longest Yard where I played one of the maniacal convicts who got to beat up the guards playing football in the prison. The audiences around the world loved my line, “I think I broke his f–ing neck!”

    I enjoyed making that film as it was the one where I met my wife Diane. Another film that was a lot of fun to make was They Went That-A-Way & That-A-Way with Tim Conway. We also enjoyed making L’ Humanoid with Barbara Bach and Corrine Clery as the film took us to Rome where we filmed at the famous Cinecitta Studio and on to Israel where we filmed moon valley effects by the Red Sea and with the help of matte shots placed a futuristic city around the Kennedy Memorial which I walk out of. In both countries we worked a five-day week and had a car and driver to take us sight seeing on the weekend. I had my wife Diane and my then two older children with me and we brought over my mother and my sister’s two girls so they could enjoy the experience with us.

    What inspired you to write your autobiography, Making It BIG In The Movies? And speaking of making it BIG just how tall are you anyway?

    I decided to write my life story and how I broke into acting because that is the most asked question especially by hopefuls who believe that they want to be an actor. Breaking into the movies and carving out a successful career and a good living wasn’t an easy accomplishment. Many would-be actors and actresses fail in the attempt and you see the sad reality in young girls and young men who stand on Sunset Boulevard hoping to be picked up and earn a few dollars for rent and food so they can keep trying to make it big in show business rather than go back home as failures.

    I did a lot of things that helped me become a success and I thought if I could pass them on along with the reality of how tough it was then perhaps it could save a lot of heartache as many people reading my book would realize that it took me 17 years to finally do that first James Bond movie and seemingly become an overnight success!

    If you read my autobiography you discover that I had to do many innovative things and to have a regular job in between so I could finance the trade ads and the publicity and acting coach expenses. Many of these stories are not only useful but also very interesting and sometimes humorous making for a good read.

    I am actually 7 foot and and one-half inches tall. I say Seven two because it’s easier. Unlike some tall skinny guys I am really “big” weighing around 350 pounds. Being “big” wasn’t enough however and that’s why you need to read my book.

    Well, I’ll defiantly have to read your book now! Thank you very much, Mr. Kiel, for spending your time with CBn today.

    Thanks for all the time and good questions and see you soon.


    To discuss this interview visit this thread on the CBn forums. Thank you to Richard Kiel for all his time and great stories.


    (You can pick up a signed copy of Kiel’s autobiography, “Making it BIG in the Movies”, from his web-site RichardKiel.com where you can also put in a request for a signed photo of him–plenty of picture choices.)

  2. Tarantino's "Casino Royale" Appears in Industry Production Chart

    By johncox on 2004-05-07

    Filmmaker Quentin Tarantino (Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill) has for years expressed a desire to make a faithful adaptation of Ian Fleming’s first James Bond novel Casino Royale. Ideas the director has floated in the past have included shooting the movie in black and white, and even using voice over narration in order to incorporate Fleming’s text. Most recently Tarantino has said he would cast the potentially ousted Pierce Brosnan as his Bond, and Uma Thurman as Bond Girl Vesper Lynd.

    Brosnan has endorsed Tarantino’s approach (which should come as no surprise considering how badly he wants one last shot at playing 007), but Eon Productions and MGM have remained publicly quite on the matter, saying only that Bond 21 is on track for a 2005 release, and that decisions as to who will direct, and who will play 007, will be made “in the next few months.” [See: MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21]

    But now Quentin’s Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” is appearing in a respected online movie industry production database, Production Weekly (a subscription service), as a “development” project under Tarantino’s A Band Apart production company banner.


    “CASINO ROYALE” Feature Film
    A BAND APART
    7966 Beverly Blvd., 3rd Fl., Los Angeles, CA 90048
    PHONE – [edited for privacy] FAX – [edited for privacy]
    STATUS – Development
    DIRECTOR: Quentin Tarantino CAST: Pierce Brosnan
    Sir James Bond is enjoying his retirement when four international agents press him into service again in hopes of smashing SMERSH and Topple LeChiffre at the baccarat tables. Bond is taken in by Agent Mimi (alias Lady Fiona McTarry) who immediately falls in love with him. Bond’s illegitimate daughter, Mata Bond, whose mother was the late Mata Hari, is going to help out. The current agent using the Bond name, Cooper, has his hands full, despite his assistance by beautiful secretary, Moneypenny. 007’s nephew Jimmy Bond is supposedly incompetent. Bond, hoping to clear his name from its current low repute, hires Evelyn Tremble to meet LeChiffre at the gambling tables at Casino Royale. The world’s richest agent, Vesper Lynd, helps convince Tremble to masquerade as 007.


    Does this mean the Tarantino “Casino” is going ahead? Might we get another “Battle of the Bonds” in 2005?

    Not likely.

    Eon/MGM now hold the rights to Casino Royale, awarded to them after the 1997 court battle with Sony Pictures (who now own Columbia, the studio that made the 1967 Casino Royale with David Niven). Despite the presumption of the listing, A Band Apart cannot adapt the book, remake the ’67 film, nor even use the character of James Bond in anyway. Eon and MGM hold all cinematic rights to the character of James Bond. Period.

    It’s more likely that Tarantino (who is never press-shy) is putting his ideas out there in the hopes of swaying Eon into a co-production of some kind. It’s also possible that the listing was generated by an over-zealous fan, or an industry professional who picked up on the numerous Quentin/Casino stories and included the listing without realizing that the director doesn’t actually own the rights. Further suspicion is raised by the fact that the plot outline on this listing is that of the 1967 farce — hardly the faithful adaptation of Fleming that Tarantino has spoken of in the past.

    Nevertheless, with two such headline-grabbing names as Quentin Tarantino and James Bond, no doubt the rumors will continue. But unless Eon announces a co-production with the famous filmmaker, Bond fans should not expect to see Quentin Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” anytime soon.


    Related articles:

  3. Tarantino’s Bond Bid

    To discuss this news visit this thread in the CBn Forums.

  • The Men Who Could Be Bond

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-05-02

    With MGM Vice Chairman Chris McGurk saying that there will be a decision as to who will be James Bond “in the next few months” (MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21), speculation as to who will play 007 in Bond 21 has been running wild. Will Pierce Brosnan come back for one last outing, or will we see an all-new actor in the role? As we wait for an official announcement, do the lists on IMDB of the leading candidate’s upcoming projects offer any clues as to who will be wearing Bond’s tux in 2005? Here’s a look…

    (Bond 21 is currently set for a late 2005 release, which means filming would take place in late 2004 and/or early 2005)


    Orlando Bloom
    He currently has two films set for release in 2005 (Kingdom of Heaven and Elizabethtown) and one set for 2006 (Pirates of the Caribbean 2). Seeing as Kingdom of Heaven (2005) is currently being filmed… there are two scenarios. If Elizabethtown is filmed in late 2004 / early 2005 and Pirates of the Caribbean 2 is filmed in late 2005, then he probably won’t have time to fit Bond 21 (2005) in. But if Elizabethtown‘s filming doesn’t conflict with Bond 21’s filming and Pirates of the Caribbean 2 is set for late 2006 instead of early 2006 (being filmed in early 2006), then he will indeed have time for Bond 21.

    Pierce Brosnan
    He has two films, excluding Bond 21, set for release in 2005 (Instant Karma and Mexicali). He’s currently filming The Matador which means that Instant Karma will probably be filmed in late 2004 and Mexicali will film before or after Bond 21 in 2005. Bond 21 is listed in his current films, but notice the cast list is just the 3 Bond characters who carry over from film to film – M, Q, & Bond. I think he is definitely making room for it if the roll is offered to him again.

    Colin Farrell
    He currently has two films listed for release in 2005 (The New World and Ask the Dust). From the looks of it, it’s possibly that both will be filming in 2005 and therefore it would be a tight squeeze if he were to add Bond 21 into his schedule.

    Mel Gibson
    He has one film listed for release in 2005 (Mad Max: Fury Road). From the looks of it, it seems possible that the filming of Mad Max would conflict with the filming of Bond 21.

    Hugh Jackman
    His last project listed is Van Helsing (2004, currently in theaters). He is not yet listed for X-Men 3 (2006)… is he holding out for something else? You’d think being Wolverine that his negotiations would have been one of the first to be taken care of. Even if he does get signed for X-Men 3 (2006) filming would take place in late 2005 / early 2006). He is also performing in a Broadway play, The Boy From Oz, but the show will end it’s season in September 2004. So, knowing this… he could in fact work both X-Men 3 and Bond 21 into his schedule.

    Jude Law
    He currently has one film listed for release in 2005 (Dexterity). Oddly enough he has seven films coming out this year, two being filmed in 2004 and the rest in post-production. And now suddenly he only have one film for 2005, maybe he has something up his sleeve? He definitely has the room for Bond 21 in his schedule.

    Heath Ledger
    He has three films set for release in 2005 (Nautica, Brokeback Mountain, andCasanova). So from the looks of things his time is taken up for 2004-2006, therefore it’s highly unlikely that he would be able to work in Bond 21 for a 2005 release.

    Ewan McGregor
    He has one film set for release in 2005 (Robots) which is currently being filmed. Then he has one film set for release in 2006 (Gnomeo and Juliet), to either be filmed in late 2005 or early 2006. So he quite possibly has the whole of 2005 open for Bond 21.

    Clive Owen
    Filming for his next film Savage Grace (2004) should start soon. This is the last film he has listed on IMDB. That leaves him with an open schedule in 2005 for Bond 21.

    George Lazenby
    His schedule is completely clear for him to accept the roll. Will he be given a second go at 007?


    To discuss this article visit this thread on the CBn Forums.

  • Brosnan Tempers Rhetoric in Recent T.V. Appearances

    By johncox on 2004-05-02

    Pierce Brosnan, who has been waging somewhat of a PR war with James Bond producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli over his future as 007, has dramatically tempered his rhetoric in his latest television appearances promoting his new film, Laws of Attraction. While print interviews still contain Pierce’s oft-quoted statements that “The producers are in a state of paralysis,” and “They don’t know what to do,” Pierce all but avoided discussing James Bond in two recent high-profile T.V. appearances on The Tonight Show With Jay Leno (April 29) and The Tavis Smiley Show (April 30).

    On The Tonight Show With Jay Leno — certainly the largest T.V. audience of Pierce’s Laws of Attraction press tour — Pierce said nothing about James Bond. The only mention of Bond came as part of a Leno joke (he asked Pierce if when he was dating he used the line “I’m Remington Steele” or “I’m James Bond’”). On PBS’s The Tavis Smiley Show, host Smiley, who again and again said that he was a “huge” James Bond fan, got little from Pierce on the current state of affairs. In the provocative interview — in which Pierce spoke of his environmental concerns and even called the current U.S. administration “men of war” — the subject of James Bond was left until the very end. Here Pierce simply shrugged and said, “I’m not sure where it’s gonna go from here, but, it’s been good.” [Read the complete transcript of the interview here.] Pierce did give his standard “paralysis” speech on ABC’s The View, but it appears this show was taped before the Leno and Smiley interviews.

    Does this sudden lack of Bond talk indicate some sort of change in the current situation? Is it resignation on Pierce’s part that the role is, indeed, going to another actor, or does it indicate a possible resumption of talks? Or perhaps Brosnan is simply trying to keep the interviews focused on Laws of Attraction (which opened #4 at the box office this weekend) and away from the always enticing topic of James Bond.

    MGM Vice Chairman Chris McGurk has stated that Bond 21 is on schedule for 2005 and that a decision as to who will play Bond will be made “in the next few months.”

    Stay tuned.


    Related articles:

  • Brosnan Confirms The Producers Are Talking to Jackman & Owen
  • Bitter Brosnan: “Negotiations have now ceased.”

  • MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21

  • Brosnan ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’
  • Pierce Keeps Pressure on Bond Producers

  • ‘…I don’t know what’s going to happen. I have no idea.’
  • Brosnan Speaks Out in Detail on His Future as Bond

  • Pierce Brosnan A Little Frazzled?

  • Brosnan: “My Future As 007 Is Opaque”

  • Eon Says That Brosnan is Bond ‘For Now’
  • LICENCE REVOKED
  • Brosnan’s Head is on the Block?

    To discuss this news visit this thread in the CBn Forums.
    Thanks to “Mr. Asterix” for The Tonght Show info.

  • Brosnan Confirms The Producers Are Talking to Jackman & Owen

    By Guest writer on 2004-04-27

    Written by: Matt Weston (aka: [dark])
    To discuss this news visit this thread on the CBn Forums.


    In an interview with Cinema Confidential, Pierce Brosnan has not only confirmed that the 007 producers are talking to other actors for the role of James Bond in the yet-to-be-named Bond 21, but has also named names!

    When asked if there was another actor he thought the producers would go with, Brosnan revealed that the producers had been speaking to both Hugh Jackman and Clive Owen about overtaking the role. The actors received Brosnan’s blessing, after he claimed they are both “fantastic” actors.

    Aside from this admission, Brosnan’s talk of Bond was not unlike the usual mumbo-jumbo we’ve been hearing from him lately, as he spoke of the producers’ paralysis, and that they do not know which direction to take.

    Q: Where does the new Bond film stand right now?

    PIERCE: It doesn’t stand anywhere. I don’t know what’s happening. There’s a paralysis that has come upon the producers. They don’t know whether to go forwards, backwards, sideways – I don’t know. As far as I’m concerned, I’ve honored my contract of doing four [Bond] movies. They know where to find me if they want me for the fifth.

    Q: Is there someone else do you think that could be the next Bond?

    PIERCE: Oh, there will always be someone else. If I was the fifth [Bond], there can always be a sixth.

    Q: Is there another actor you think they will go with?

    PIERCE: Yeah, I mean they’ve talked to Hugh Jackman and to Clive Owen – both actors are really fantastic and have the chops for it. I have no idea. I really don’t concern myself. I don’t lose sleep over it. I don’t wake up thinking, you know, ‘Am I going to be the next Bond?’ or ‘Is someone else going to be the next Bond.’ I have to let that one go, I really wouldn’t do myself any justice if I would lose sleep over it. If it’s the end of the ride, then so be it. I can move on and make films like “Evelyn,” “Thomas Crown,” or this movie… The movie has put me on a landscape on an international level, and for an actor, that’s a magnificent gift to have.

    For the full interview, in which Brosnan discusses Laws of Attraction, After the Sunset and life with his family, click here.

  • Bitter Brosnan: "Negotiations have now ceased."

    By johncox on 2004-04-25

    Pierce Brosnan is being much less “opaque” these days about his standoff with producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson over his future as James Bond. Back in February, CBn and MKKBB reported that negotiations between producers and the star had ceased. When questioned, Brosnan has been evasive as to his status, choosing to use the word “opaque” and hinting that the series itself was in a state of “paralysis.”

    But in an interview published today in the Boston Herald (Law’-breaker: Pierce Brosnan shakes up perfect image with new romantic comedy), the clearly bitter Brosnan confirmed that negotiations have indeed ceased, and while not offering much new in the way of specific details, he did speak more candidly about the situation than he has before.

    The following excerpt is from the Boston Herald:

    If “Laws of Attraction” does its work, Brosnan won’t have to worry about his status as 007. He had expected to be preparing for nine months of filming for his fifth turn as the world’s most famous secret agent. Instead, he’s heading to Mexico City to work with Greg Kinnear and Hope Davis (“American Splendor'”) on an edgy, low-budget comedy for DreamTime.

    “All I know is before I went on the last promotion for the Bond: Die Another Day, I’d done my contract, my four movies,” he said. “They said they wanted to do a fifth, and we started negotiations, and those negotiations have now ceased. Where does that leave me? How do I answer this question?”

    If this looks like some kind of a publicity ploy, Brosnan makes it clear that’s hardly the case. He is clearly upset.

    “It would be nice to have the respect for the people you have worked hard for to give an honest answer,” he said. “It would be nice to have it on level ground. But nobody knows. I wish I could be more specific and say, ‘No, they’re going to look for somebody else. My time is up; they’ve found somebody else.’ I can’t say that, and at the same time I can’t say, ‘Well, we’re going ahead,’ because they said, ‘We don’t have the script. We don’t know what to do.'”

    Rumors always have been part and parcel of the 007 franchise. As Brosnan notes, a spinoff film with Halle Berry’s Jinx was going to be made.

    “That went pfft! To look for the truth, you have to go to MGM. Good luck! You have to go to the Broccolis. Even greater luck,” he said.

    As to the present impasse, Brosnan said, “You try to answer as specifically and as honestly as possible because I don’t have anything to hide. But I don’t know what’s going on, except they don’t know how to deal with it.”

    Last night Fox New Channel, in a report on Brosnan’s future as 007, also stated that negotiations have “ended.”


    Thanks to [dark] for the Boston Hearld alert, and “johnboy007” for the Fox News alert..
    You can discuss this topic in the Bond 21 forums.

    Related articles:

  • MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21

  • Brosnan ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’
  • Pierce Keeps Pressure on Bond Producers

  • ‘…I don’t know what’s going to happen. I have no idea.’
  • Brosnan Speaks Out in Detail on His Future as Bond

  • Pierce Brosnan A Little Frazzled?

  • Brosnan: “My Future As 007 Is Opaque”

  • Eon Says That Brosnan is Bond ‘For Now’
  • LICENCE REVOKED
  • Brosnan’s Head is on the Block?
  • The Gloria Hendry CBn Interview

    By The CBn Team on 2004-04-22

    I first met Gloria Hendry in New Oreans in the fall of 2000 and was immediately taken by her beauty. She’s more beautiful now at the age of 55 than she was when she appeared as James Bond’s first African-American love interest in “Live and Let Die” more than 30 years ago. But there is more to Gloria Hendry than just a pretty face. She’s smart, funny, and warm to all that she mets. And she’s a damn good singer, too! She may have never achieved superstardom, but in the eyes of this fan she certainly is a superstar who shines very brightly indeed.

    I conducted this interview with Gloria nearly two years after we first met. Some of you may have read it elsewhere before and some of you may be discovering it for the first time. Regardless, I hope you enjoy reading more about this wonderful woman and her experiences working with the world’s greatest secret agent.


    Tell us a little about yourself.

    I am the eldest of two girls. We were born in Florida. My family members are from Georgia, Alabama and Florida. My people are Seminole Indian, African, Creek Indian, Irish, Chinese and something else and range in color from deep chocolate to café ‘ole. Since America symbolizes the melting pot of the world, my family members are true Americans.

    My mother left Florida to join my grandmother and grandfather in Jersey City, New Jersey, when I was about 2 years old and my sister around a year old. We lived with them until I was about 7 years old. From the age of 7 until 18, my sister and I lived with my mother and her companion in Newark, New Jersey until I graduated from high school. Throughout elementary school, I maintained excellent grades and played the violin in the All-City Orchestra and performed for radio, and various academic events.

    During my high school years, my grades were average and my educational training consisted of Gregg shorthand, typing and various clerical skills to prepare me for my occupation as a Secretary. After graduation, I attended Essex College of Business for Law for a Legal Secretary position. All through school, I excelled in sports of all kinds: basketball, touch football, baseball, volley ball, sprinting, fence climbing, bicycling, swimming, gymnastics, Latin dancing, jumping rope, roller skating which continued into my adulthood, tennis, snow and water skiing, distant running, weight lifting, ballet, roller blading, ice skating and Karate.

    You were the first African-American Bond girl (Unless you count Thumper from Diamonds Are Forever) and at the time it wasn’t socially acceptable for a white man to be with a black woman. Do you think that your role in the film helped make the interracial situation more acceptable to audiences?

    I remember Harry Saltzman talking seriously to me about racism. He expressed that it was a shame that we still had racism. He said that everyone should marry another race so no one could say they were one race or the other and this would stamp out racism. He suggested to me that I should marry a Caucasian. Then, he introduced me to a very special gentleman whom he considered would be a good choice for me to marry. I went out with him a couple of times, and he told me how to dress and act. I became disinterested in an arranged marriage.

    As an African-American woman with a white co-star in the 1970’s did you ever receive any negative feedback from the audiences?

    A fan told me that in certain sections of Live and Let Die, where Roger and I were kissing by the lake was cut out. My photograph and name were splattered throughout the world in various newspapers, magazines and billboards with positive comments associating me with Live and Let Die. For a number of years thereafter, people called upon me to make special appearances and/or to give my endorsement for various causes.

    If I didn’t know any better, I would have thought that I had starred in Live and Let Die. After being associated in advertising all over the world and going from one publicity event to another for Live and Let Die, I found after time had passed my name was no longer associated with the film. Nor was I named or called upon when there was mention or request of the 007 James Bond Ladies. I never knew what to think of that.

    How did you get the role of Rosie Carver?

    I received a phone call from my manager, Lloyd Kolmar, in New York City, who said, “I need you back in New York to audition for “Live and Let Die,” the James Bond movie. I said I don’t have a chance in the world. They want large breasted women, not me. Besides, I’m not White. My manager said, “They want to see you. Don’t you understand? You have to fly back on your own dime.” I had to think about that. After a couple of days in numbers crunching, I called him back and said exasperated, OKAY! Where is the audition? Lloyd gave me Harry Saltzman’s office address in New York City and the time and date for me to appear. I caught the next flight out. I still had my New York apartment. So, I said to myself, I’m going to put on my best clothes. It was November 1972.

    When I walked into Harry Saltzman’s office, I saw this regal, strong, sophisticated, deep, dark set eyes, white-haired man, quietly sitting there. As I entered, he stood up. He said nothing, just gestured for me to sit down and so did he. And in the next moment, he asked me how was my flight here from Los Angeles. I told him. Then, he said, How soon can you fly out to New Orleans to meet the director, Guy Hamilton, and Roger Moore? We can book you on the next flight. If you would like. I said, without thinking, Okay! So before I knew it, Mr. Saltzman made arrangements with his secretary. He had a car waiting for me.

    So, off I went to the airport on the next flight out. At the airport in Louisiana, a driver met me with a sign holding up my name and picked me up in a large Mercedes limousine and took me to the French Quarter where someone from the “Live and Let Die” production greeted me. I met with the director, Guy Hamilton, and Roger Moore, The Saint. I was very nervous. We talked, laughed and ate. It was like a dream come true. But, I knew not to take any of this seriously. Then, they took me to the movie set to watch them continue to film “Live and Let Die.” They were most gracious and asked if I wanted to stay for the weekend. I said, No, no thank you. I would like to return to New York on the next available flight. That evening they said, We will call me later to let me know. I returned to New York City and stopped at my apartment again and got a few things, then, hopped the next available flight to Los Angeles, California. About a week had passed, I received a telephone call from my manager, Lloyd, “YOU GOT IT!

    Tell us about you relationship with Roger Moore. In his James Bond Diary he refers to you as “Gloriass” which has lead some people to believe that you two didn’t have a “sparkling” relationship.

    Throughout the filming of Live and Let Die, Roger Moore and Harry Saltzman were most gracious and kind to me. By the way, during our stay in Ocho Rios, Jamaica, at the Sans Souci Hotel, my room was located in between Roger and his family and Harry and his family which I had the great pleasure of meeting and often having dinner with them. In my mind, I thought they wanted to keep an eye on me and keep me safe. However, I snuck out as often as I could to hang out with the people of Jamaica. I had the fortune to fall in love with a wonderful Jamaican gentleman.

    It’s been said that Roger Moore didn’t like or get along with many of his female co-stars. How would you respond to that?

    During the filming and stay in Jamaica, Roger shared his chauffeured driven limousine with me each workday. Whenever Roger was asked and he signed his autograph, he gave me the pen and said sign yours too (this was a first-time experience to sign my name for any fan). Each morning, around 6:00am, Roger and I shared the hotel swimming pool, half asleep, pushing dead bumblebees aside, as we swam from one end of the pool to the other, in opposite directions. I liked Roger very much. He was a true gentleman.

    Tell us about locations shooting.

    We filmed from November through December 1972 in Jamaica. Sometime in December, Harry asked me whom would I love to share the holiday spirit? Without any hesitation, I told him, my Mother. He said, so be it. I called my Mother at her factory job, American Aluminum, in New Jersey, requesting her to take off and join me. My Mother was thrilled. She had never been to Jamaica or for that matter ever flown first-class. Harry had my Mother flown first-class and stay with me until New Year’s Day.

    How many days total were you on location shooting?

    After my Mother left Jamaica, I was called in for a meeting with Harry and Guy, who said in essence, we don’t want to kill you off Madam because so many people like you. So, standby there might be a script change. A couple of days after that, Harry apologized that they had to kill me. So, we shot the scene that day. Then, I was flown ahead of everyone, as a tourist, to London, England, where someone met me at the airport. My hotel room took up the entire floor of the hotel. I had the opportunity to work at the legendary Pinewood Studios, dubbing and completing interiors.

    It was always very dark and cold in London – there was never any sunshine. During my stay, I received a telephone call from a producer and was sent a script and offered a starring role in a film opposite Jim Brown, “Slaughter’s Big Rip-Off,” which I accepted.

    The producers often are said to have given the best of the best to their stars. Would you agree?

    Yes. They had treated me like I had starred in Live and Let Die and so much more. The only time I saw the film with the public was in New York City at the 1973 United States’ premiere with my mother and her companion, sister and I were chauffeured in a large black limousine Cadillac, a huge affair that I had never ever experienced in my whole life. I remember not knowing how to act because people were shouting my name, asking for my autograph (remembering Roger giving me the pen to sign), cameras were flashing all around me and at that moment in my life, I felt I was somebody really, really special.

    My photograph and name were splattered throughout the world in various newspapers and magazines with positive comments. For a number of years thereafter, people called upon me to make special appearances and/or to give my endorsement for various causes. If I didn’t know any better, I would have thought that I had starred in Live and Let Die.

    Everyone on the set treated me like I was starring in Live and Let Die. I had my own chair, dressing area, Roger shared his limousine with me, and personal publicity shots. The photographer followed me throughout filming both in and out of the States. One day, someone on the set came up to me and told the story that the role of Solitaire was initially written for and a Black actress was hired to play the part. While filming somewhere in New York City or New Orleans, they decided that it was too risky to have a Black Woman end up with James Bond. Therefore, the role of Rosie Carver was switched to Black and the role of Solitaire was switched to White. That is where I came in. I am known as MRS. JAMES BOND.

    Tell us about working with Guy Hamilton and the others on the crew. I’ve talked with Guy Hamilton and he seems like he’d be a pleasure to work with.

    Guy Hamilton was a joy to work with. He took his time. Never got upset. If the scene was not working, he would take me aside and have a conversation about the weather, then mention a thing or two about the scene. Then we would return to filming. Roger disliked retakes, so Guy handled Roger with great care and consideration, as he did all of us.


    To discuss this interview please visit this thread on the CBn Forums.

  • MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21

    By Guest writer on 2004-04-20

    Rumours have been swirling wildly regarding as-yet-untitled Bond 21, ever since that Daily Mail article earlier this year. Brosnan’s in, Brosnan’s out, Brosnan wants to do it, Brosnan’s sick of doing it, Britney’s in, Britney’s out. The more astute people can pick the serious stuff from the serious fluff.

    But the Brosnan debacle is the word on everybody’s lips. Until now, Eon and MGM have declined to speak on the matter, aside from a brief snippet from an Eon spokesperson claiming that Brosnan was still "their Bond", and that they had not said anything to convince otherwise. Almost all of what Bond fans have been reading has come from the mouth of James Bond himself, Pierce Brosnan (or his friend and neighbour, "Die Another Day" co-star, Michael Madsen).

    Until now.

    MGM vice chairman and COO Chris McGurk has spoken to Variety about the current state of Bond 21.

    According to McGurk – and contrary to recent rumours – Bond 21 is still scheduled to begin production "early next year", with a view to a probable November 2005 release. With Neal Purvis and Robert Wade hard at work on a script, McGurk commented on the rumoured creative differences between Eon and MGM (rumours that were only fuelled by MGM’s axing of the Halle Berry-led Jinx spin-off).

    "Like any good production relationship between top-tier producers and a studio, you’re always going to have disagreements," he said. "We had a lot of disagreements on the last Bond, and they all got sorted out to everybody’s satisfaction."

    McGurk said that aside from the fact that no 007 is currently linked to the picture, it’s business as usual for the Bond franchise.

    "All creative decisions are mutual between the studio and the producers. They make recommendations and both sides can say yea or nay. We’re going to go through the same process on this one."

    According to McGurk, decisions about a director, and the actor who will play James Bond, will be made "in the next few months."

    This news item has been written by CBn forum regular Matt Weston, known as “[dark]” – Many thanks!
    Feel free to discuss this topic in this thread in CBn’s Bond 21 forums!

  • Brosnan ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’

    By Evan Willnow on 2004-04-17

    Appearing in an interview on HBO’s ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’, to plug his new movie Laws Of Attraction Pierce Brosnan speaks of playing the role of James Bond, and gives Costas a hint of the future.

    Unfortunately, the questions on the top of everyone’s mind were asked off camera, but Costas shared some of the answers with the audience. Costas: ‘I asked about doing a fifth Bond movie and his answer was non-commital though he did say with an enticing script he’d be willing to suit up again.’ Costas also gave us this bit, ‘ [Brosnan told me] that he thought Jackman would make an excellent choice.’

    On camera Brosnan could not avoid Costas’ questions about Bond. On his predessors Brosnan says ‘Connery, he’s the one who casts the big shadow. Roger Moore was fantastic but for me as an actor there was only one man to take the belt from—to get in the ring with—was to face Connery. He was a huge hero of mine.’

    And on Dalton, ‘When you read the books [Bond’s] a very kind of dark character and Tim Dalton really did a darn good job, but the public didn’t want that. They didn’t want that sombre Bond.’

    A humourous moment came when Brosnan tells Costas of his first meeting with Sean Connery, ‘I saw him there about four years ago breifly one morning as I was closing the trunk of the car, there he was. (In Connery voice) “Pierce, good morning. Are they paying you enough money?” (back in his own voice) “Ah… Sean hey how you doing?” and then he was gone. He’d just come down to the studio for a haircut.’

    Costas also asked, ‘Do you ever wish you could play Bond back in the From Russia With Love or Dr. No days? Before the special effect became such a big part of it.’ Pierce answered, ‘Oh yeah. I mean I think that’s what’s lacking is the character—more of the character—the stillness of the character. I’ve spoken to them about it, but I think they want to keep the big opening sequences, and they want to keep the pyrotechnics going. I would like to have much more of a thriller aspect to it. … You could still have the big bang for the buck, I think. I think you can have your cake and eat it with this.’

    Pierce’s entire interview on ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’ will be replayed through out this week on HBO and HBO2 Check your local listings.

    Discuss this story in this thread of CBn’s forums.

  • Brosnan Begins 'Laws of Attraction' Promotion

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-04-15

    Pierce Brosnan, the latest James Bond, has returned to star in a Romantic Comedy from New Line Cinema. “Laws of Attraction” (PG-13) is set to hit theaters in the United States nation wide on Friday, April 30, 2004.

    Pierce Brosnan stars as celebrated New York divorce attorney Daniel Rafferty, a media darling who finds time to practice law in between writing legal books and appearing on the talk show circuit. Brosnan describes his character as a man who had been in the game a long time but who has lost interest in what he does. Raffery only continues arguing cases because “he’s very good at it,” says Brosnan. “And then, out of the blue one day he goes into divorce count and meets this other great attorney, Audrey Woods [Julianne Moore].”

    “They come from different schools of thought,” explains co-writer/director Peter Howitt. “Audrey follows the rules and doesn’t lose a case because she’s so good. Daniel is this forgetful, slightly Columbo-like slacker. But with him, what you see is not what you get.” Instead Daniel’s laid-back presense hides a cunning and acute intelligence.

    “It’s a dance between the two of them,” says Pierce Brosnan. “And it started from the first glance. Daniel’s not going to let Audrey go until he wins her. These two people deal with miserable lives for a living, couples whose lives have fallen asunder, who have fallen out of love. And now they find themselves falling in love, knowing all the pitfalls of love and marriage. Yet, he’s willing to fight for her.”

    Love always has the last word.


    Members of the “Laws of Attraction’ cast and crew were interviewed by Chud.com. And from that interview, a bit from Pierce Brosnan about James Bond…

    Q: But you’ve got one more dance with Bond – is there anything left to do with the character?

    Pierce: Well, the dance…we seem to have taken a break at the moment. The producers have reached an impasse, as far as I can tell. They don’t know what to do. They don’t know how to move on. A sense of paralysis has set in. So, for me it’s business as usual. I shall just carry on with creating work for myself. I certainly would love to do a fifth Bond and then bow out, but if this last one is to be the last one, then so be it.

    Q: We’ve discussed before Michael Wilson’s timidity to make a Bond movie in the vein of From Russia With Love and I think that’s a real problem…

    Pierce: It’s frustrating, really, because they feel they have to top themselves in a genre which is just spectacle and huge bang for your buck. For me, I think you can have your cake and eat it. You can have real character work and real storylines and a thriller aspect and all the kind of quips and asides and explosions and the women. I love From Russia With Love. It’s one of the finest pieces.

    Q: So with the next one, would you want to cut back to a more For Your Eyes Only-type model? More simple, less effects-driven?

    Pierce: More of a character-driven piece, yes. Certainly more of a character-driven piece and what is going to happen next in the story because now we’re just saturated – it’s wonderful the spectacle they create. It’s fantastic. But I love the last one and where it was going – until we got to Hong Kong and I was into the suit and into the old straitjacket of playing him.

    Q: The stuff in the prison at the beginning was great.

    Pierce: Yeah, that was like, ‘Huh? This is a Bond movie??’ But they broke out of it too soon into the formulaic, safe side. They’re too scared.

    Q: If they changed it, you’d do more than one more?

    Pierce: Oh, my contract is up. They can do it or not.

    Q: You say there’s a paralysis – are they talking to someone else?

    Pierce: They say they’re not talking to someone else…

    Q: But they might not tell you?

    Pierce: (smiles a knowing smile) What a game! ‘I thought you were my friend! I thought we were friends…’ (mimes taking a knife out of his back) This belongs to you, I think!

    Q: So, if they changed it to more like From Russia With Love, would you be more inclined to carry on?

    Pierce: I’d be inclined to carry on if it were From Russia With Love or anything. Just, the fifth was there. We started talking about the fifth and so this paralysis that set in is rather surprising.

    Q: But they finally got back the rights of Casino Royale, but [Wilson] said he wouldn’t dare film any of the story, so he just wants to scrap the novel and use the title.

    Pierce: Well, that’s ludicrous. It’s absolutely sheer lunacy because Casino Royale is somewhat the blueprint for the Bond character anyway. If you go to that book, you find out more about James Bond than in any of the other books. But hey, they’re a wonderful family that’s done it their own way for many years and they’re at a point now where they’ve suffered a great loss in the passing of their mother. They’re an Italian family, an American family and they’re in the unique position that no one else in this community called Hollywood stands it – they have full control of this franchise. So, I don’t know what’s going to happen. I have no idea.


    Laws of Attraction teaser & trailer

    In preperation for the April 30th releace Pierce Brosnan will be appearing on a number of tv spots to promote his news film and to generate buzz. (thanks to Pierce Brosnan’s official web-site for the following list)

    April 16, Friday (11 p.m. EST/PST)
    On the Record with Bob Costas on HBO

    April 22, Thursday (7-9 a.m. – Exact time not determined)
    Today Show on NBC

    Thursday April 22, Thursday (10 a.m.-12 p.m.)
    Laws of Attraction Special on TLC

    April 24-25, Saturday & Sunday (TBD – 48 hours interspersed)
    Laws of Attraction Weekend on Lifetime Movie Network

    April 26, Monday (8 p.m. EST/PST)
    A&E Biography on A&E

    April 29, Thursday (TBA)
    The Early Show on CBS

    April 29, Thursday (11:30 p.m.)
    The Tonight Show with Jay Leno on NBC

    April 30, Friday (10 a.m.)
    The View on ABC

    April 30, Friday (11-11:30 p.m.)
    Tavis Smiley on KCET/PBS