CommanderBond.net
  1. Timothy Dalton IS Amphitryon

    By Matt Weston on 2004-07-29

    Timothy Dalton, the fourth actor to play James Bond, has signed onto NBC’s new mini-series, Hercules, joining The Lord of the Rings‘ Sean Astin, Never Been Kissed‘s Leelee Sobieski and newcomer Paul Telfer in the title role. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Dalton will portray the hero’s stepfather, Amphitryon, in the four-hour epic from Hallmark Entertainment.

    Dalton as Amphitryon in Hercules

    Dalton as Amphitryon in Hercules

    Dalton, who portrayed 007 in The Living Daylights and Licence to Kill, has had a long relationship with the mini-series’ executive producer, Robert Halmi Sr. The two last worked together on 1999’s mini-series, Cleopatra, in which Dalton played Julius Caesar opposite Billy Zane and his The Living Daylights co-star, Art Malik.

    According to Halmi, the mini-series will put a new spin on the age-old tale of Hercules, focussing instead on Hercules’ inner strength, as opposed to the brawn approach that has been often taken in Hollywood adaptions of the story. “His strength comes within,” Halmi said. “He grows strong emotionally, mentally and spiritually as he tries to redeem himself.”

    The mini-series will be directed by Roger Young (1988’s The Bourne Identity) from a script by Charles Edward Pogue (Dragonheart). A budget of over $20 million has been set aside for the project, which will begin shooting in New Zealand on 23 August. The mini-series is set to premiere in May 2005.

    Hercules will mark Timothy Dalton’s return to the screen following 2003’s Looney Tunes: Back In Action, in which Dalton portrayed an actor typecast as a secret agent. Dalton has most recently been seen on-stage in the UK performing in a theatre adaption of Philip Pullman’s fantasy adventure trilogy, His Dark Materials.

  2. Take a Bow: Pierce Brosnan as James Bond

    By Devin Zydel on 2004-07-28

    Taking a look back at Pierce Brosnan’s career as James Bond, one can notice the definite sense of style in the films. With his four films as James Bond, he went through a variety of changes ranging from the personal The World is Not Enough to the glossy Die Another Day. Pierce Brosnan has easily been a very successful actor to portray the suave, sophisticated, and stylish British agent known as James Bond, but to what extent?

    GoldenEye

    Making an entrance

    GoldenEye PosterTaking over from Timothy Dalton, after a long six years without a James Bond film, Bond was back, and in a way we had never seen him before, in the 90’s. The Cold War was over, there was a new ‘M’, a new mission, and new threats. The plot itself was an interesting take on making a villain who knows Bond’s every move. It proved to be a very interesting idea because fans were given a villain in the style of Francisco Scaramanga, the “dark side of Bond,” but with a twist, this time the villain was once on the good side of Bond.

    A Man of Action

    Introduced in 1995’s GoldenEye, he immediately lit up the screen in a fast paced pre-credits sequence. Bullets blazing, explosions occurring, and of course, stunts to launch surprises at the audience. Brosnan is clearly a Bond who can do the action and have it come off well on screen. The opening bungee jump and the leap after the plane are such examples that please the audience. Continuing in the same film, he casually takes what time he needs to wipe his face after a fist fight with a guard. He straightens his tie while in a tank chasing after others and being chased. “Bond. Only Bond,” comes to mind. Brosnan has gotten into a variety of action induced sequences on film. The extremely hard hitting finales with enemy Alec Trevelyan (006) to the battle with the emotionally charged Renard in the nuclear sub are such examples. Brosnan clearly can do the action as James Bond, and he does it in a crowd pleasing style.

    The Ladies

    The ladies are often not far away in the four Pierce Brosnan James Bond films, and there have been a variety of them. GoldenEye introduces the ever important computer programmer Natayla. Eventually she meets James Bond as her connection with the satellite crosses into the path of Bond. His relationship with Natayla is an interesting one. Clearly she has no interest him upon their first meeting, or she doesn’t prefer to show it. It’s basically those two surrounded by the enemy, which eventually leads to them working together. He chases after her immediately when she is taken captive, and saves her on the train. Their partnership of sorts pays off though. She locates the villain; he works to get them there. The same partnership is in existence during the finale. Natayla works to disable the Goldeneye satellite, Bond works to physically stop the enemies.

    Deserving a Bow?

    There is much to discuss on the merits of this film and Pierce Brosnan’s first role as James Bond. Many fans were pleased to see a James Bond who seemed to get the first film of the decade off to a brilliant start. Labeled as a mix between Connery’s deadly assurance and Moore’s comic wit by fans, Brosnan served as a fine midpoint of the two. However is that enough? Does the idea of taking a bit from this James Bond actor and a bit from this one make him seem stale in comparison? With his performance in GoldenEye, many were able to start performing an opinion, while others knew from the beginning how they would perceive Brosnan as James Bond.

    Tomorrow Never Dies

    Terminator Bond?

    Tomorrow Never Dies PosterAlready planned before GoldenEye had been in theatres, Tomorrow Never Dies suffered a strenuous shoot and increased the action known to the series in this specific film. Since then, the term “Terminator Bond film” has often been included in such descriptions of the film by fans. Some critics and fans felt the finale which included several gun fights and explosions was far too overdone to even be considered James Bond film action. However, the film generated similar box office business as the previous adventure, so it goes to show that a different take on the action in a Bond film, even if it means having slightly more of it can make a successful film adventure.

    A Man of Action

    Yes, there is a lot of action in this one, but with a fantastic range. Tomorrow Never Dies brought a new twist to the popular car chases in the Bond films. Bond drives the car with a phone. It’s a scene that works with Brosnan, he’s cool and confident in the scene. We hadn’t ever previously seen such a action piece with the past Bond actors. He’s often moving and running around while the chaos continues. He’s thrashed around in the backseat while the prized BMW 750il receives a beating. Brosnan works as Bond though, if even to notice his small grin when the useful tire inflation kicks in. Is the action too much though? The film goes from a car park chase to a HALO jump to a Saigon bike chase to a warehouse brawl. While there is a large amount of action, it is tastefully edited and put together. Too much fighting with too little time to breathe, or is it the little scenes such as the preparation at the bay, the discussion of the Devonshire’s location, and other scenes of dialogue that provide these sources of taking a breath?

    The Ladies

    No longer Bond girl, but Bond woman, and that’s what Wai Lin most definitely is. A strong willed Bond woman, which seems to be the best fitting term, who is on a mission of her own. Viewing from Wai Lin’s point, Bond can be the one coming along. Brosnan and Michelle Yeoh both work well in this film with this type of pairing. They both meet undercover at the same party, both plan a break in at the same villain’s location, both search for the same underwater clues, and both have the same goal. A simple scene as them preparing and then embarking on their evening trip to search for the stealth ship is very effective. They both enjoy the other’s company, and Brosnan and Yeoh give class act performances. Teri Hatcher also shares some strong scenes with Brosnan. While her character’s role is on a much smaller scale, it still commands a strong importance. The old flame idea is an intriguing one for Brosnan’s Bond, and it works very effectively in causing a problem between Bond and the villain. We also see how Brosnan’s Bond seems genuinely saddened and distraught when he finds her murdered after just spending the night with her. While past Bond actors suffered losses also, you can clearly see the anger in the scene. It’s strong scene that capitalizes on his role as an agent with a licence to kill.

    Deserving a Bow?

    It depends on how one likes one’s Bond film, and how one likes Brosnan’s performance. There have been general criticisms from fans that he had just not settled into the role yet, and the one-liners seemed pushed and not having a flowing effect. That can possibly be due to the fact that some fans were relying on the “third times a charm” point. The action highlights the film and doesn’t detract from it. However, there have been complaints about too much focus on action, or too far-fetched a plot. Does this film fall into the sophomore slump?

    The World is not Enough

    This time it’s personal

    The World Is Not Enough PosterFar more a dramatic looking and feeling film than the previous two, The World is Not Enough explores a far more personal side to Bond and his actions and choices while on the dangerous mission. There’s an added layer of this film having more than just a mission Bond is assigned. It’s when it hits home with ‘M’ being kidnapped, Bond realizing he has been betrayed by the sultry and powerful Elektra King, and what he must do to stop her chaotic plan with Renard. The drama seems to have been increased in this film, making Bond’s feelings stand out. A lot more to this film than just your average mission, but does it make the plot better?

    A Man of Action

    Most definitely, a gripping ride in the extremely long opening pre-credits sequence which features Brosnan’s Bond chasing after the ever evasive Julietta “the Cigar Girl,” which takes him from MI6 headquarters to under several Thames bridges to hanging from a hot air balloon. Later on in the film a snow chase, a commonality in the Bond films, takes place. While the idea is an interesting one because instead of other enemies on skis, we have the ground and air capable Parahawks, might the scene just seem stale with machine guns shooting? Later in the film there is the pipeline sequence, and tension is the word to describe it. The chase itself is also an example of where CGI was used to highlight, but not overtake a sequence in a Bond film. Brosnan clearly isn’t taking this sequence in his usual calm, cool manner. Instantly when he requests the time possible to diffuse the bomb, there’s a manner of determination present. It’s a riveting sequence that grabs the viewer’s attention the whole time and doesn’t release until it’s over. Add to that Brosnan’s rapid and hasty movements in the sequence, and its set for excitement.

    The Ladies

    On a scale of highlighting the power of a female villainess, Sophie Marceau’s Elektra King ranks highly. She immediately gains the support and trust of many she knows, including the MI6 staff, and Bond. It’s not until certain little clues start appearing that her true intentions and loyalties become clear to Bond. She offers what may be one of the most emotionally straining choices for Bond, when he shoots her dead preceding the underwater finale. Her lines are meant to show how she thinks Brosnan’s Bond is a book which she knows from start to finish. She clearly seems to know, or at least believe she knows his thoughts. Asking him who’ll be afraid, and also claiming he could never kill her. Not her, not a woman he loved. Christmas Jones is the other main female lead of the film. The character of Christmas is much simpler compared to the comparatively complex Elektra. While initially suspicious of Brosnan’s Bond, she grows to like him, continuing along with him throughout the rest of the mission to the very end.

    Deserving a Bow?

    Letting the fans clearly see the feelings of Brosnan’s Bond during the film provided them with a chance to see his Bond from a different standpoint rather than just a man on a mission. Does the idea to make Brosnan more personal work? Is James Bond a more human character now, and is that how fans want to see him? Fans have pointed out that the film can be said to be nothing more than a soap opera with the actors and actresses just moving through the motions, from one scene to another. Or is this a plan to give the audience something more than just a mission that worked?

    Die Another Day

    Continuing the Legacy

    Die Another Day Poster2002 was the 40th year of this series legacy, and Die Another Day celebrated. Was there a little too much celebration perhaps? There are several scenes which include hints and winks to the past areas of the cinematic and literary Bond. The including of many relics of the past and winks sometimes did take over sequences in the film. Was there too much focus put on including those kinds of elements and not the plot? Or perhaps the film was a brisk and fast paced adventure that knew where it wanted to go, with Brosnan firmly leading it.

    A Man of Action

    There was a wide selection of action in this film. A sword fight, a laser fistfight, the often appearing car chase, hovercraft battles, and much more were featured. The hovercrafts proved to be a very original way to throw a twist into the typical chase after James Bond, a rather large loss for Brosnan’s Bond in being in control in a chase. Brosnan has lots to do in the sequence and it highlights his strength as indeed, a man of action. There is the controlling of the hovercrafts while in a mine field, but also dealing with the deadly Colonel Moon. The Blades sword fight was something new and was a highlight of the film. It’s the classic high stakes meeting between the villain and James Bond. An obvious dislike at each other which escalates into a bit of sport as the scene continues. Bond’s quite set in his ways to prove his strength to Gustav Graves during the scene, and does so when it concludes. The finale isn’t a favorite for all fans however. Graves and Bond fight, but the majority of the tension is lying in the crashing plane. While the Antonov does provide a fight between Gustav Graves and Brosnan’s Bond, does the scene have the same effect as an earlier Brosnan action scene, such as with Alec Trevelyan in GoldenEye?

    The Ladies

    Halle Berry’s Jinx offers Brosnan’s Bond a partner of sorts. Their initial meeting of each other has both of them slowly finding out exactly what there is to know about the other. It’s not until the madness at the Cuban clinic that the audience can clearly and easily see it. While Rosamund Pike’s Miranda Frost has the icy reserve on at the party in Iceland, it’s Jinx that is much more welcoming to Bond. They join forces completely later on and Bond clearly has feelings for her. He chases into the melting palace to finally save her life. The finale aboard the ill fated Antonov plane has them working together, similar in style to that of Brosnan and Yeoh in Tomorrow Never Dies. While Jinx seems to be an efficient character, she can sometimes be found to be in need of help actually, although her character has been hyped as being Bond’s equal. She’s trapped in the Ice Palace, where she is luckily saved by Brosnan’s Bond. The other woman Bond encounters is the frigid in nature Miranda Frost. She offers a challenge to Bond in even allowing him to get close to her, something which as first, seems to have no chance. When she betrays him though, there is a complete flush of anger inside of him. Enough anger to make him try to kill her at the first chance with his P99. It goes to show that some of the women Brosnan’s Bond encounters can get under his skin, and be in control of him.

    Deserving a Bow?

    There is much in this film to analyze. The references to past Bond films and novels, the strong willed Jinx character and other characters, the clear increase of CGI, and obviously Pierce Brosnan’s role and performance are such examples. There is a plot that could have been phenomenal had more emphasis been put upon it. Did this film bring the series to a high point on its 40th anniversary, or was there too much to be shooting for? Did the including of references, hints, and winks affect the plot and overall pace of the film?

    Bond. James Bond?

    Brosnan Photo Shoot

    Pierce Brosnan has done some magnificent things for the James Bond series. Sparking the luxurious title of the “Billion dollar Bond” and drawing in more and more fans to the series, it is obvious that the films have done well financially. Brosnan has made contributions to the series, but have they been positive or negative? His dialogue and scenes with many of the characters, the thrilling action sequences, tension filled finales, there is much to these films. Brosnan clearly has been through many stages as James Bond: from battling against a once fellow agent in GoldenEye, the original mission of Tomorrow Never Dies, and being betrayed by women he trusted in The World is Not Enough and Die Another Day. As James Bond, has he done it all? Has he taken his bow as Bond, James Bond?

  3. David Arnold Tunes In For Bond 21

    By Matt Weston on 2004-07-28

    “The thing with the Bond… you know, I want to do them ’til I drop down dead.”

    David Arnold

    Andrew Collins of 6 Music (BBC) yesterday interviewed regular Bond film composer David Arnold, who confirmed that he is working on the upcoming twenty-first James Bond film, which will mark his fourth consecutive 007 score.

    According to Arnold, “[The film] is going in a very, very interesting direction… We’ve taken [the movies] to a point where I think I’ve exhausted that particular scene of approach. What I’m already thinking of now is… you’re at the bottom of the mountain again and you have to get back up to the top via a different route.”

    “I think there is a way of doing Bond differently again … I’m looking forward to it.”

    David Arnold

    Arnold also commented that the film is still on target for 2005, contrary to rumours that suggested the film has been delayed. The composer also made no reference to the Brosnan/Bond saga that has been dominating the Bond 21 limelight over the last six months.

    “The two criticisms that I’ve always had doing Bond is that it sounds too much like John Barry and it doesn’t sound enough like John Barry.”

    David Arnold

    As for Arnold’s prior Bond experiences, the composer told 6 Music that he more or less poured everything he had ever wanted to do in a Bond film into Tomorrow Never Dies, his first Bond gig, on the assumption that he would never get asked to return for another film. However, he was asked by the series’ producers to come back for the following film on his final day of recording, yet still, Arnold did not realise it was a definite offer, instead thinking to himself, “Well, at least I’m in with a shot.” Of course, Arnold did return for The World Is Not Enough, a task the composer felt was a difficult one to live up to. “I guess I [had] the problem everyone has when you kind of do a sequel or something, which is how do you do the same thing again?” Arnold recalled. “And the thing with Bond is, there’s a kind of audience expectation with the music, where it’s got to sound a certain way, some of the time. Not all of the time, but some of the time.”

    “It’s very reassuring, where you’re hearing that particular sound, and you’re looking at James Bond doing something, you know, that only something James Bond can do and there’s something sort of very reassuring and exciting about it.”

    David Arnold

    The interview also discussed his early years as a composer, including his work on Stargate, Independence Day and his four-day deadline on his score for The Stepford Wives, as well as his tastes in other film scores, such as Fight Club and Kill Bill.

  4. Brosnan REVOKES his own Licence to Kill

    By The CBn Team on 2004-07-27

    CBn reported back in Febuary of this year that Pierce Brosnan would not be returning to play 007 in Bond 21. Bewteen then and now… Brosnan opened up to talk about how no one really knew what was going on with the next Bond film (1, 2, 3). Soon after that things became silent (1, 2); then news broke out from a source other than Brosnan that there was indeed a despute between the Bond producers and Brosnan and negotiations had crumbled between the two.

    Yesterday on Access Hollywood there was mention of Brosnan being cut from the Bond franchise. Now today the magazine Entertainment Weeky has reported that it appears Pierce Brosnan is indeed turning in his licence to kill.

    In an interview on the magazines web-site Pierce Brosnan said, “That’s it, I’ve said all I’ve got to say on the world of James Bond.” Brosnan also mentioned that Die Another Day (2002) was his last mission on Her Majesty’s Secret Service. “Bond is another lifetime behind me.” But for Brosnan, playing Bond will always be a fond memory…

    “We went out on a high, and I look back affectionately at that time and doing those four movies. But I’ve said all I gotta say on it.”

    – Pierce Brosnan
    ew.com Interview

    So the big question is who does MGM and Eon/Danjaq really have in the running to be the next James Bond? Will they approach Brosnan and ask him to return, and if so will he take the role back for Bond 21? Will Brosnan return in a later movie, like Sean Connery did for Diamonds are Forever and Never Say Never Again? Or have we really seen Pierce Brosnan’s last day as Bond in Die Another Day?

  5. Moonraker a "reaction" to Star Wars? Not So Fast…

    By johncox on 2004-07-21

    John CoxSo the familar story goes like this: In 1977 Cubby Broccoli planned to follow up his first solo James Bond film, The Spy Who Loved Me, with For Your Eyes Only (so said the “James Bond Will Return” credit at the end of the film). But when Star Wars proved to be a monster hit in the summer of ’77, Cubby jumped on the Star Wars bandwagon and announced that Moonraker would be the next James Bond film. This has prompted Bond fans and Bond historians to criticize Cubby and Moonraker with what has become the dogmatic “Bond films should lead, not follow.”

    But now this bit of Bond history may need to be rewritten.

    While doing research at the Motion Picture Academy Library, I found a very interesting newspaper clipping dated January 12, 1976. It was the official announcement of Cubby’s takeover of the Bond production empire from Harry Saltzman (“Broccoli to Be the Sole Bond Film Producer”). In the article Cubby lays out his future plans for 007. Interestingly, he planned to go back to one film per year…and listen to this last paragraph:

    The Spy Who Loved Me will be followed by the production of Moonraker in 1977, and For Your Eyes Only in 1978.

    Here, a full year before Star Wars was released, we have Cubby announcing Moonraker as Bond #11!

    I find it more likely that Cubby moved For Your Eyes Only into Moonraker‘s planned production spot when the U.S. space program delayed the launch of the first space shuttle. But when Star Wars became a mega hit, Cubby went with his original plan and made his space-themed Bond film, even though the first shuttle launch was still years away (the space shuttle “Columbia” launched on April 12, 1981, two months before to the release of For Your Eyes Only).

    Sure, Moonraker is definitely influenced by Star Wars (laser guns, space battles, etc.), but in light of this article, I don’t think we can say that Moonraker was a reaction to Star Wars. Cubby Broccoli was looking toward the stars before anyone had ever heard of Luke Skywalker.

    Bond was leading…not following.


    Roger Moore, Lois Chiles, and Director Lewis Gilbert on location in Paris during the production of MOONRAKER.

  6. Eon Scouting Prague As Possible Bond 21 Location?

    By johncox on 2004-07-18

    Eon Productions are looking to film James Bond 21 in the Czech Republic and have begun talks with studios and service companies in the city of Prague, according to a report in the showbiz trade paper Variety.

    Prague has become a popular shooting location for many Hollywood productions. Bond fans will recall that the first Mission: Impossible was set largely in the capital, as was Sony’s James Bond franchise competitor xXx. The bulk of Hugh Jackman’s Van Helsing was shot in the city and its environs. Universal’s Doom is confirmed for a September-February production schedule. Also headed for Prague is 20th Century Fox’s Josiah’s Canon starring Sean Connery.

    The Variety article reports that while the producers are “keen” on shooting Bond 21 in Prague, a final decision may be waiting on the completion of a script.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Bond 21.

    Related articles:

  7. Lazenby, Blessed With a Baby Boy!

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-07-14

    In January of this year CBn reported that former On Her Majesty’s Secret Service James Bond actor, George Lazenby was only months away from becoming a father.

    We’re now proud to announce that Mr. Lazenby, 63, and his wife Pam Shriver, 42, are now the parents of a wonderful baby boy! Shriver gave birth to the 8 pound, 2-ounce George Samuel Lazenby on Monday July 12th at 11:59pm.

    True to form, Shriver & Lazenby shared the great news by letting everyone know shortly after midnight via a pre-arranged e-mail…

    “[We’re] thrilled and everyone is well.”

  8. Are 007 Auditions Taking Place?

    By Matt Weston on 2004-07-13

    Hot on the heels of new claims that Pierce Brosnan has been left out in the cold after Bond 21 screenwriters convinced Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson that their script will work better with fresh blood, comes a new report that auditions for the role of James Bond have been taking place.

    According to the International Movie Studio’s World Movie Magazine, 37-year-old Geoffrey Moore, son of Sir Roger Moore, attended a read-through with Broccoli after contract negotiations between Brosnan and the producers fell through.

    In late April, Brosnan revealed that the producers have been talking to Clive Owen and Hugh Jackman, both of whom received the actor’s blessing. However, neither actor has mentioned auditioning for the role, with Owen claiming he has not even spoken with the producers about taking over from Brosnan.

    As for Sir Roger’s son, Geoffrey serves as a restaurateur, despite having a history, albeit a small one, in front of and behind the camera. According to the IMDb, Moore has starred in six films between 1973 and 1993, including one telemovie based on Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and another in a brief role starring alongside his father in Sherlock Holmes in New York. Geoffrey also acted as a third assistant director on his father’s last Bond film, A View To A Kill. Sir Roger has regularly touted his son as an ideal replacement once Pierce Brosnan steps down as 007.

    “I think Geoffrey has the necessary charm, wit and sophistication to be 007. He is much better looking than me and much more talented, so I think he would be perfect for the role. Maybe he could even incorporate a bit of the cooking into the role.”

    – Sir Roger Moore, 2002

    Sir Roger’s daughter had a brief cameo in Die Another Day as an air stewardess.

    As the rumour inferno rages on, the twenty-first James Bond film is still scheduled for release in November 2005.

    Related articles:

  9. New Claims: Brosnan Out For Bond 21 Following Dispute

    By Matt Weston on 2004-07-10

    A new report from the respected UK newspaper The Daily Telegraph has broken the recent silence on the Pierce Brosnan Axed saga, which has been fuelling ever since the story first broke in early February. In Saturday’s edition, Charlie Methven wrote in his Spy column that Brosnan has been left out in the cold following a feud with the producers.

    According to the newspaper’s unnamed source, producer Barbara Broccoli became annoyed with Brosnan after he demanded a “Tom Cruise-level” paycheck for the next film and then publicly complained about being “snubbed”. Upon learning that the producers were beginning to search elsewhere for their 007, Brosnan reportedly changed his tune, but it appears he missed his chance. The IMDb had reported a similar story in early May, although with a different outcome, believing that Brosnan had made amends with the producers. However, speaking in late May, Brosnan made clear once again that his future in the role was still uncertain.

    According to the source for this latest news, the script penned by screenwriters Robert Wade and Neal Purvis (erroneously referred to in the article as “Andrew Neal”) is ready and signals a change of direction for the series. Purvis and Wade reportedly convinced Barbara Broccoli that the avenue to take for Bond 21 was that of an “old-style” Bond flick, as opposed to a special-effects-driven blockbuster. “Without all the special effects, the film will work best with a young, fresh actor,” explains the insider. “Andrew and Robert have at last persuaded everyone at the production company, Eon, that a traditional Bond is the way forward. So now it looks like Brosnan’s services won’t be required.” Whilst it is hard to believe that these two relatively new members of the Bond family have enough clout to persuade Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson to shift their focus for Bond 21, if a falling-out has occurred between Brosnan and the producers, there may not be much persuading needed after all.

    Outside of the Brosnan fiasco, the source informs the newspaper that the film is still on-target for a 2005 release, and that “they” (presumably the writers and the producers) are heading out to Los Angeles in two weeks’ time with the ready script to “hammer out the details”.

    Despite all this, however, the situation remains definitively unresolved to the public until Eon Productions make their official announcement. With the newspaper’s alledged inside information, Eon still refused to return article writer Methven’s calls regarding the matter.

    Related articles:

  10. Toby Stephens is Hamlet

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-07-05

    Toby Stephens is notably remembered from James Bond’s last adventure Die Another Day, in which he played Bond baddie Gustav Graves against Pierce Brosnsn’s James Bond.

    Now after nine years away from the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) Toby Stephens, 35, is returning there to preform Hamlet. He last appeared with the RSC in 1994/5 in the title role of Coriolanus directed by David Thacker for which he won the Ian Charleson award.

    Toby Stephens as Hamlet
    A play by William Shakespeare
    Directed by Michael Boyd

    July 9 – October 2, 2004
    Stratford’s Royal Shakespeare Theatre
    Waterside, Stratford-upon-Avon
    Warwickshire, CV37 6BB

    When the play starts this Friday, Toby Stephens will have been rehearsing for 12 weeks prior. He is working together with the artistic director, Michael Boyd to perfect the play as a whole and not just focus on the troubled prince. The action has been moved forward slightly to the Jacobean era, when revenge plays were in their element, and Stephens is trying to create a Hamlet free of 20th century emotional baggage. Boyd chose Stephens because he knew he could be a convincing avenger.

    “I think the play tends to be a showpiece for one actor and often the production is not very good but there’s an interesting performance going on in the middle – this is a much more solid entity.

    Hamlet, to a certain extent, is a deconstruction of the revenge play. Shakespeare sets out a revenge plot but puts you in the mind of the revenger, the audience follows what is going on in his head, which is something not done before or since.

    Hamlet is less of a retiring academic incapable of revenging his father and more the revenger who has to deal with various moral issues and problems – how do you kill a king without dying yourself?

    He has to deal with just having seen his father’s ghost come back from purgatory, suffering for his sins and he’s wondering what’s going to happen to him when he dies.

    It is a dark play but there is humour in it too. I think it’s got bogged down in a lot of psychology, it’s become Freudian, layered with modernity. Shakespeare wrote in a time when there was no conception of that.”

    -Toby Stephens

    Hamlet is the highlight of Toby Stephen’s career so far and he cannot stop talking about it.

    “It’s a dream for an actor to be asked to play the part but it’s very hard work – the guy never stops talking. There is a lot to do and a lot to learn and get right. It’s the hardest thing I’ve ever done. It’s such a seminal part and it’s something I’m immensely proud to be doing. Most actors never get the chance to play it, I’m very aware I’m amongst a privileged group of people.”

    -Toby Stephens

    You can purchase tickets to see Toby Stephens as Hamlet from the RSC…

    On-line: RSC Box Office
    By telephone: 0870 609 1110. (9am-8pm, Mon-Sat)
    In person: At the Royal Shakespeare Theatre (address above) from 9:30am-8pm, Mon-Sat (6pm on non-performance days)