CommanderBond.net
  1. Views On 'A View To A Kill'

    By Devin Zydel on 2005-05-22

    Exactly 20 years ago, on May 22nd 1985, Roger Moore’s seventh James Bond film, A View To A Kill had it’s premiere in the US. With the tagline of ‘Has James Bond finally met his match?’ and a cast filled with such actors as Christopher Walken, Tanya Roberts, and Grace Jones, the film proved to be Moore’s last in the series, and the role of 007 was passed onto Timothy Dalton. CBn looks back at some of the reviews of this Bond film; from the good to the bad…

    ‘Moore definitely goes out on a high note with this effort.’

    Ryan Cracknell, Apollo Guide

    ‘In this 007 film, former real man James Bond not only eats quiche, he literally bakes it.’

    Dan Lybarger, Nitrate Online

    ‘A View To A Kill’ by: Andrew Hicks

    ‘This is one of the weaker James Bond movies out there, but it’s still not that bad, if you don’t mind a movie with a running time of over 130 minutes. It would have been better with about thirty minutes of boredom cut out and if, perhaps, the director had coaxed a better performance out of Christopher Walken. I like the guy and think he’s a decent actor and definitely one of the strangest individuals on the planet (good to know I’m not alone), but as villain Zorin he’s way too bland.

    Roger Moore makes his seventh and final appearance as James Bond, and I think it was about time for the guy to step down. In this one, he just doesn’t seem too enthusiastic about being the single most indestructible babe magnet on the planet. Of course, I wouldn’t be able to manfacture much enthusiasm either if I had to sleep with Grace Jones. That’s a nasty-looking woman right there.

    The plot this time has Walken as an ambitious microchip manufacturer who plans to create an earthquake that will destroy Silicon Valley, eliminating his competition. Maybe that’s where Bill Gates got the idea to send the CEO’s of Atari and Commodore 64 to sleep with the fishes. Grace Jones, the least feminine woman out there (Sandra Bernhard being the runner-up in that competition) is his musclebound assistant, May Day. Her name, of course, comes from the phrase shouted by every man who’s ever seen her topless. And as usual, it’s up to James Bond to stop everything.

    A View To A Kill moves slowly and is acted without much eagerness or excitement, yet has some merit as a Bond movie. It’s got all the violence and chase scenes, some that are fun, some absurd. The sequence with Bond hanging from a fire truck ladder falls into the latter category (Latter. Ladder. Get it?), as does the entire last twenty minutes of the movie, which I’ll just say involves a dirigible and the Golden Gate bridge. Still, nearly every James Bond movie is better than this one, which should be watched only by true fans of the series.

    ‘No Bond outing is awful, but this one comes close.’

    John J. Puccio, DVDTOWN

    ‘Not as bad as its reputation, but certainly among the lesser Bonds.’

    Jeffrey Westhoff, Northwest Herald

    ‘A View To A Kill’ by: James Berardinelli

    A View To A Kill represents the farewell bow of two long-time Bond film actors: Lois Maxwell, who portrayed Miss Moneypenny in all fourteen official movies from Dr. No to this one, and Roger Moore. While Moore’s stamp on Bond was never as memorable as Sean Connery’s, seven pictures and thirteen years gave him the time and opportunity to re-shape the British agent in his own image — something he did with the likes of The Spy Who Loved Me, Moonraker, and For Your Eyes Only — the best entries of his tenure. But all eras end, and A View To A Kill lowered the curtain on this one, opening the door for Timothy Dalton to take the role.

    A View To A Kill is often numbered among the worst of the series, but, upon closer inspection, this film is a vast improvement over Octopussy. Even though Moore sleepwalks his way through the part, making it apparent that he should have departed two films ago, and Tanya Roberts can’t act to save her life (although she certainly can scream), we’re back to a more conventional, straightforward Bond than the convoluted mess of the previous movie. The stunts are more spectacular than ever, Christopher Walken is a chilling psychopath (a role he has become intimately familiar with over the years), and Grace Jones is viciously effective as his sidekick.

    Walken plays Max Zorin, a brilliant-but-unstable industrialist who intends to corner the market on computer chips by destroying Silicon Valley with an earthquake. Bond is sent out to stop him, hopping from Europe, where he’s partnered with Tibbet (Patrick MacNee), to the United States, where he joins forces with geologist Stacey Sutton (Roberts, the only ex-“Charlie’s Angel” to play a Bond girl). Locations include arctic Russia, Paris, and San Francisco.

    The film opens with a lively, fast-paced chase across a snowscape, with Bond using skis, a snowmobile, and an improvised snowboard to escape his attackers. John Barry has a little fun with the music here, inserting some forty seconds of the Beach Boys’ “California Girls” as 007 zips down a mountain and across a small pond. This is one of the series’ better pre-credits sequences, and provides a solid intro to Duran Duran’s chart-topping title song.

    Trying to do a few things that haven’t previously been attempted with Bond, A View To A Kill features a pursuit through the Eiffel Tower that ends in a death-defying leap, an out-of-control horse race, a road chase with 007 in a fire engine, and a struggle at the top of the Golden Gate bridge that has Bond fending off a blimp. There are conventional action sequences as well, including a car chase through Paris and several energetic fist fights. These thrills and stunts are the real reason to see this film.

    A View To A Kill concludes Roger Moore’s reign as 007 on a significantly higher level than it began (with Live And Let Die), leaving all that the actor brought to the role — both good (his sly charm) and bad (his fatuousness) — to posterity. Unlike Connery, Moore never said “never again”, but, despite his fans’ wishes, it’s highly improbable that he’ll ever come back for another engagement. A View To A Kill is the last time this Bond will be in our sights.

    ‘As certain films in the Bond series have set specific benchmarks for tone, A View to a Kill is James Bond in comic book perfection.’

    Almar Haflidason, BBC

    ‘Moore should have bowed out after the superb “Octopussy”, but this is still a pretty good time at the movies.’

    Rob Thomas, Capitol Times

    ‘A View To A Kill’ by: Steve Rhodes

    In a fast chase high atop the Eiffel Tower, James Bond, in 1985’s A View To A Kill, climbs the stairs in pursuit of the killer known as May Day. Just when he’s about to capture her, she takes a flying leap to escape. With a striped parachute to break her fall, she glides easily to the ground.

    The killer, played by the strikingly tall and ultra-macho Grace Jones, has jet-black hair shaped like “Winged Victory.” With Jones’s rippling muscles and her sinister and sexy scowl, her acting is best when left to the physical. When she speaks, her limitations as an actress become immediately obvious.

    Roger Moore, still at the peak of his Bond form, shows no sign of tiring of the role. (Okay so he’s not and never was Connery’s equal.) But this is Moore’s last outing as the world’s greatest secret agent.

    Christopher Walken plays a rich Swiss industrialist named Max Zorin, a mean blonde with a big head of hair, who lives in a palace that the French kings would have envied. Even with all his riches, he scams to fix horse races so that an inferior bred horse can win.

    Zorin’s biggest scheme includes the ending of “the domination of Silicon Valley.” So how is he going to wipe out the heartland of American chipdom? Well, just remember it’s in California. You can figure out the basic idea.

    Walken is surprisingly underutilized and restrained in the film. Why director John Glen didn’t let Walken cut loose remains a mystery?

    One particularly imaginative sequence in the picture has Bond about to be drowned in a sinking car. He stays alive by sucking the air from one of the tires until the bad guys leave the shore, figuring he must have died.

    Bond films delight through their travel views of luscious locales as well as their action. In this episode, in addition to Paris, we have a magnificently sunny San Francisco, albeit mainly the touristy Fisherman’s Wharf area. Dozens of San Francisco police black-and-whites bite the dust when they chase a hijacked fire truck with Bond and his female companion, played by Tanya Roberts, going across the city’s hills and bridges.

    With a strong cast of supporting characters, including Walken, Jones, and Patrick Macnee from “The Avengers” and with Moore in fine form, the movie, nevertheless, is often a snoozer. The action sequences from steeple chases to fast inflating dirigibles are imaginative, but the story never establishes any rhythm or builds much sustained energy. The net result is a story that has us yearning for those much older Bond films that never lost your attention.

    ‘The worst James Bond film ever.’

    Brian J. Arthurs, Reporter-Southern California

    ‘Another fine moment from everyone’s favourite super-spy.’

    Clint Morris, MovieHole

  2. Michael G. Wilson Talks 'Casino Royale'

    By Tim Roth on 2005-05-18

    Variety has revised its article claiming Casino Royale would begin filming in
    "Summer 2006"; the article now reads "early 2006". Therefore,
    yesterday’s
    speculation
    about Bond 21 to be pushed to 2007 now seems meaningless.

    Meanwhile, as the

    Daily Bulletin
    reports, Michael G. Wilson has come out with some real facts. Speaking to
    Harvey Mudd students on the weekend about photography, Wilson said: "I know that
    many of you have questions about the next James Bond film. I generally get asked
    the same questions wherever I go. I’ve found that nine answers will take care of
    most of those questions."

    He then went on and said, without naming the questions: "I don’t know which
    actor; January 17; October 19, 2006; Aston Martin; ‘Casino Royale’; Martin
    Campbell; Prague and South Africa; yes, Judi Dench will be back; and no, Halle
    Berry won’t reprise, but I’d love to make another film with her."

    This means:

    • no actor for the role of James Bond casted yet
    • start of shooting: January 17, 2006
    • either end of shooting or release date: October 19, 2006
    • Bond will again be driving an Aston Martin car
    • the film will be called Casino Royale
    • Martin Campbell will be the director
    • locations will be Prague and South Africa
    • Judi Dench will reprise her role as ‘M’
    • Jinx will not be back

    While most of the now confirmed facts are not news to CBn readers, two points
    have to be looked at more precise: South Africa and October 19, 2006.

    South Africa was one of the first rumours surrounding Bond 21; CBn first had
    an article on it in July 2003. Later, insider "Pierce-B" from Absolutely James
    Bond
    claimed that South Africa and Liverpool were being scouted by EON. Nothing
    more was heard about it until today.

    While Wilson gave mostly very precise replies, the only vague thing he talked
    about remains "October 19, 2006." Will it be the release date for Casino Royale
    or will this date only mark the final day of shooting?
    Previously
    it has been reported that the film will be released on November 17, 2006.

    Sadly, all other questions were blocked. Wilson admitted it’s more fun to
    talk about photography than about Bond, in part because there’s less pressure.
    Nobody’s blogging about the Wilson Centre for Photography. "I live in a
    fishbowl," Wilson said. "You can’t have a casual remark. So I am somewhat
    guarded speaking about Bond."

    Very true.

     

    Related Articles:

  3. 'Casino Royale' Pushed to 2007?

    By Tim Roth on 2005-05-17

    UPDATE: Variety has revised its article claiming Casino Royale would begin filming in “Summer 2006”; the article now reads “early 2006”. Therefore, the speculation about Bond 21 to be pushed to 2007 now seems meaningless.

    Variety reports today that the start of shooting of the 21st James Bond movie,
    Casino Royale, has again been delayed. “As word circulates along the Croisette
    that the next James Bond pic is set to move from its historic U.K. production
    base to Prague’s Barrandov Studios, sources close to the production have told
    Variety that Casino Royale will begin its shoot in the summer of 2006, rather
    than later this year as has been erroneously reported.”

    As a possible result the release date of Casino Royale could be pushed to
    summer 2007. Most fans will surely welcome the fact that there will be a 007
    film in year 2007, but on the other hand it will be the 2nd longest break in
    Bond history between two films, only beat by the 6 year interval between License To Kill (1989) and GoldenEye (1995).

    Meanwhile, Pavel Strnad, chairman of Czech producer’s association APAAPA,
    confirmed CBn’s
    recent
    article
    about the production moving to Prague. He said: "It is great for
    such a high profile film to come to Prague. This makes it clear that the Czech
    Republic is still great value, despite current currency exchange problems. What
    is significant is not only are we successfully competing against countries like
    the U.K. and Canada, but we are successfully competing against countries in our
    own region which offer cost savings but do not have the quality of services and
    facilities to be found in Prague".

    Speaking from in front of the British pavilion on the Croisette, veteran U.K. producer Martin Bruce-Clayton deemed the reports “very, very sad. I know the Bond people had scouts in Bulgaria and other places and, let’s face it, this is all about money.”

    Eon Productions, in the meantime, stays tight-lipped. "We haven’t confirmed
    any of our locations for Casino Royale", said a spokesperson.

    Keep watching CBn for all the latest news on Casino Royale.

    Related Articles:

  4. For Sale: The House That James Bond Built

    By johncox on 2005-05-16

    The house that James Bond built is on the market.

    According to Contact Music, “the estate of Albert R. Broccoli” (presumably Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson) have put the Beverly Hills mansion belonging to legendary Bond producer Cubby Broccoli and his wife Dana up for sale.

    Cubby & Dana Broccoli

    Cubby & Dana Broccoli

    The house, built in 1924, had formerly been owned by actors William Powell and Hobart Bosworth. It comes with eight bedrooms, staff quarters and a screening room.

    The Broccolis bought the house in 1969 where Cubby lived until his death in 1996. Dana continued to live in the house until her death in 2004.

    The house was the site of many famous dinners hosted by the Broccolis for friends and business associates. James Bond #4, Timothy Dalton, was a frequent visitor.

    The property is on the market for a cool $28 million (GBP14.7 million).

    Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, who inherited the Bond empire, now live primarily in England. They are currently searching for a new James Bond to star in the 21st installment Casino Royale.

  5. CBn Visits With Lana Wood

    By Charles Helfenstein on 2005-05-15

    It was a “plenty” good time in Gaithersburg, Maryland as the CBn east coast crew visited with Diamonds Are Forever actress Lana Wood. Charles HalfensteinLana enthralled us with tales from the set of Diamonds are Forever, her stints as a guest star on various TV shows, and life with her famous sister.

    After getting autographs and pictures taken, she became a fountain of information, anecdotes, and laughs. She said that she had been delighted to work with Sean Connery (James Bond), since they had been friends years before the film was made. She recalled dinners at the Connery house with Sean and his first wife Diane Cliento.

    She also knew scriptwriter Tom Mankiewicz well, and so right away she felt among friends. After trying out for the Tiffany Case role and not being cast, she was on her way back to LA when they called to see if she would be interested in playing a lesser part, and she was happy to say Yes.

    Dlibrasnow, Doctor Shatterhand, Lana Wood & Charles Helfenstein

    Dlibrasnow, Doctor Shatterhand, Lana Wood & Charles Helfenstein

    Doctor Shatterhand recounted the story of Cubby Broccoli bodyguarding Jane Russel during the filming of the Outlaw, and asked if that ever came up – since Lana’s obvious assets and hair style were similar. Lana said that it did not.

    I asked what sort of contact she had with Harry Saltzman during the filming, and she said absolutely none. The one time she saw Harry in the studio cafeteria, she asked Mankiewicz to introduce her. Mankiewicz refused. He explained that if they went over and she said “Nice to meet you Mr Saltzman“, Harry would ask “Why did you call me Mr. Saltzman?” And if she said “Nice to meet you Harry“, he would ask “Why did you call me Harry?” So she decided to play it safe and avoid Saltzman’s gruff reputation.

    Since a member of Natalie’s family has Hodgkins Lymphoma, Doctor Shatterhand produced two Diamonds are Forever collectables for her to sign so he could auction them and donate the proceeds to help with medical expenses. She gladly signed “I’ve got friends in this town” (at the suggestion of Dlibrasnow) in the paperback book, and “You handle that like a monkey handles coconuts” on the soundtrack CD. Look for news of the auctions soon.

    Lana Wood

    Lana’s message to CBn on one of the never released photos.

    Next she had a quiz for us Bond experts. “What is wrong with this photo?” she asked. I had never seen the shot, of her reclining in a nightgown. We gave up after a few guesses. She then explained that she had been asked to take some publicity photographs for Diamonds are Forever, and after the session, the photographs were ready to go out, Cubby Broccoli noticed a problem. Lana was wearing Tiffany Case’s nightgown. Wardrobe had put her in the other character’s clothes. And so the photos never got released.

    Speaking of lingerie, I asked her if she knew why the network had darkened the color of her underwear and digitally added in a bra when Diamonds are Forever was shown on ABC. She said she had no clue why they did, although she did get calls from the media when it happened. “What do I care?” she told them. “Ask me about something important like the war in Iraq, not about changing the color of my panties.

    Diamonds are Forever -by Jeff Marshall

    Diamonds are Forever -by Jeff Marshall

    During our discussion, Lana got a phone call on her cell phone (her ring tone isn’t the Bond theme though), and after that the talk turned to her family. She lives with her daughter, son-in-law, and 3 grandchildren, and a whopping 13 animals. She is very involved with her grandkids, and I noted that she is raising a 2nd generation of children. She agreed and said it makes her very happy.

    After a video interview with Doctor Shatterhand, Lana told us about her next shows. Australia, Japan, California, Memphis, and Chicago are all planned (watch CBn for later details). I encourage fans in those areas to make the effort to see her, because she is such a delight to talk to.

    As we said our goodbyes (had it really been 2 hours?), Lana told us to check out her new website, which is currently being constructed: LanaWood.net.

  6. CBn Reviews 'Thunderball'

    By Devin Zydel on 2005-05-13

    Over the last several months, members of the CBn Forum have been reviewing all the James Bond films in the “Countdown Threads“. If you wish to join in on the forum discussion all you have to do is register. Now here are some select reviews, varying in opinions, of Thunderball

    ‘Thunderball’ -by Bond111

    'Thunderball' litho by Jeff Marshall

    ‘Thunderball’ litho by Jeff Marshall

    I’ve been a very big fan of Thunderball since the first day I saw it. I believe it to have been the first Bond film I’ve ever seen (at a very young age). To me it contains all the best elements of a Bond film.

    The first element that sticks out for me is the amazing score by John Barry. Absolutely one of his best, and sets the tone for the film perfectly. From Russia With Love may be the prototype for future Bond scores, but I believe the one for Thunderball really perfected it. Add to that Tom Jones’s beautiful and brassy title song accompanied by one of the best main titles Maurice Binder has ever put together.

    The action and dialogue is top-notch. The underwater action scenes in particular are extraordinary, although I gather I enjoy them more than many others do. Altogether the film, I feel, is somewhat a mixture of both From Russia With Love and Goldfinger. The end effect is something to be treasured. The setting of the Bahamas creates an almost dream-like location. It seems to greatly expand on the tropical setting of Dr. No.

    Sean Connery is arguably at his best in Thunderball, paired with an absolutely stunning Bond girl (Claudine Auger), one naughty femme fatale (Luciana Paluzzi), and a menacing villain (Adolfo Celi). This one definitely deserves poster space on my wall.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by DLibrasnow

    It should come as no surprise to anyone on CBn that I rate 1983’s Never Say Never Again far higher in regard than this 1965 effort by Kevin McClory. The later movie has better dialogue (by Flash Gordon’s Lorenzo Semple Jr.), an interesting score by Michel Legrand (that I like), a great, fun fight scene between Connery and Pat Roach and the second best Felix Leiter in the 007 series (after David Hedison).

    Add to that a wonderful turn by Edward Fox as M (second only to Bernard Lee), a soberlngly funny Algy scene and the best femme fatale in the history of the movies in Fatima Blush (deliciously played with relish by the incredible Barbara Carrera) and perhaps you can appreciate why I prefer the 1983 movie.

    That said this early effort produced by Kevin McClory is not without its good points. Lucianna Paluzzi is a great femme fatale, a great performance by Sean Connery, Molly Peters, and the better female lead (Claudine Auger’s Domino is simply superior to Basingers 1983 incarnation).

    Overall this movie seems to be going nowhere fast. There is no real tension or suspense and when the filmakers attempt to inject some it merely comes out flat. Perhaps its my love of the 1983 film that colors my view but this movie does not work for me – and it’s the last review here on CBn that will be negative (because I love 1 through 12 on this countdown).

    A movie that had promise but fails to deliver. Check out the far superior Never Say Never Again instead.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by Genrewriter

    Even better than Goldfinger (slightly better flow), this is the first larger than life epic Bond film and boy, is it ever a good one! Connery is at his coolest and the villains are all top notch with Adolfo Celi giving a splendidly sophisticated villain and Lucianna Palluzzi showing off the sexiest femme fatale in the entire series. The aciton is superb with the fight aboard the Disco Volante at the end capping off one hell of an adventure. Caludine Auger is wonderful as Domino and apart from one or two dry spots, the film never loses momentum. This is as perfect a Bond film as you can get.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by Jamie007

    In my opinion the best Connery 007 film. It makes all the previous Bond films feel small scale after watching it. Its a return to the grittier and more serious first two films, but keeps the gadgets over the top stunts audiences had come to love. It combines the best elements of the first three movies.

    Connery is in great form here, but one of the main things that makes me put this film above the others – Adolfo Celi as Emilio Largo. He is one of the all time great Bond villains, and the one of the best from the Connery era, along with Donald Pleasance. The women too are definately above average in this film, Fiona Volpe has got to be the best ‘bad’ Bond girl of them all, she was terrific. Domino too was one of the most beautiful of all the Bond girls.

    The story was pretty much standard Bond fare, but it made for some terrific scenes. This film has some of my favorite Bond moments of all time, such as Bond baiting Largo in the casino, and the skeet shooting.

    About the only criticism I could make would be that some of the underwater scenes drag a little. Though I think that can be excuses, in their day those scenes were cutting edge and the audience probably couldnt get enough.

    All in all, my favorite Connery movie and my favorite Bond film after GoldenEye.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by Loomis

    First the good news: Thunderball is about a billion times better than a certain flick with the words “world”, “not” and “enough” in the title.

    And now the bad news: there’s really only one reason why this is so:

    Sean Connery, Sean Connery and Sean Connery.

    Thunderball boasts the definitive James Bond actor in what may well be his coolest performance as 007. (I said: “the definitive James Bond actor”. You heard. What’s that? Are you trying to be funny? Okay, outside, now. Sorry, just dealing with some Daltonites there, where were we?) Unfortunately, this is more or less all that Thunderball has going for it (well, apart from some pretty scenery and occasionally impressive widescreen cinematography, giving this mostly Bahamas-set adventure a nice “travelogue” flavour from time to time).

    Look, Sean Connery IS James Bond. All the proof you’ll ever need of that is in Thunderball. In spades. But to keep things short and sweet, I’ll just refer you to the scene at the Kiss Kiss Bang Bang club. How does that exchange go? “Oh, you’re mad”/”Yes, isn’t everyone?” Connery plays it to perfection. Thunderball is not only the film with arguably Connery’s finest turn as 007 (and therefore the finest turn as 007 – shut it), but possibly also the film in which Fleming’s Bond and “the movie Bond” (the two are usually thought to be mutually exclusive) are combined in the most perfect mix in the history of the Eon series. In Thunderball, Connery gives us a cold, hard, snobbish Bond for the Fleming-reading purists, and the “crowdpleasing” cinematic superhero Bond sought after by Joe Average to provide two hours of brain-in-neutral fun.

    A pity that the film in which Connery shines so gloriously is frequently so flabby and dull. What we have here are some of the greatest moments in the history of the screen Bond…. surrounded by plenty of moments that, well, aren’t so great.

    Thunderball is very different in tone not only to its three predecessors, but also to the other Panavision ’60s Bond flicks (something to do with Kevin McClory’s production, possibly). Despite generally witty dialogue and the usual 007 quips, it seems a rather humourless film; in fact I’ll go as far as to call it po-faced. Like The World Is Not Enough, it takes itself far too seriously – at times, the mood is downright sombre (another element it has in common with The World Is Not Enough is The Totally Extraneous and Unfunny Q Scene).

    It lacks the bizarre atmosphere and – forgive me – raw animal sexuality of Dr. No, the intelligence of From Russia With Love, and the overweening self-confidence and incredible coolness of Goldfinger. Frankly, it’s a bit of a mess (and horribly overlong). Sure, it’s possibly the most faithful of all the films to an original Fleming novel, but then I’ve always found Thunderball one of old Ian’s weakest (to me, it reads like a novelization, with seemingly little effort put into it, and little “heart” – c’mon, it’s hardly “You Only Live Twice“).

    And why is Claudine Auger seemingly kept in long shot for much of the movie? Rather a waste of a beautiful Bond girl when you can’t see her, no?

    Fortunately, they (well, McClory and pals, not Eon) had another bash at the Thunderball “property” and came up with the excellent Never Say Never Again, which shows its father up as the poorly-paced, meandering nonsense it is. Never Say Never Again provides a better balance of thrills and laughter, with much more enjoyable performances by the supporting cast (Klaus Maria Brandauer and Barbara Carrera, in particular, are splendid).

    All of which said, Thunderball is by no means the worst James Bond film, but that’s only because they managed to make a few others that are even shoddier. Which doesn’t say much for Thunderball, really (or for Eon, come to that), but, aw, heck, give it a spin and enjoy probably the best performance as 007 the world has ever seen.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by Qwerty

    Look Up! Look Down! Look Out! Is Thunderball the biggest Bond of them all? Well, it’s definitely one of them. I have regarded Thunderball as Sean Connery’s best James Bond film by far for many reasons. It clearly is one of the most outlandish and epic in scope, the box-office numbers alone show how popular and financially successful this magnificent movie is. Sean Connery is on the ball as Bond. Even though at the time he wasn’t always as enthusiastic for the films as he was a few years earlier, his performance in Thunderball is spot on, and doesn’t show obvious signs of boredom.

    The plot itself is terrific. The idea, in 1965, to steal two nuclear warheads and then hold countries for ransom is massive and very effective. Comparing to most likely From Russia With Love and You Only Live Twice, in this film, you really see the entire SPECTRE organization at work with one of their most powerful operations.

    The characters are excellent as well. Nearly all of them stand out as being some of the best. I’ve always thought Emilio Largo to be sometimes overlooked in favor of Auric Goldfinger, but he is just as ruthless and cruel. His torture sequence of Domino most certainly shows this. Fiona Volpe is without a doubt, one of the very best femme fatales in the series. Her chemistry with Connery’s Bond is spot on and the dialogue between the two of them (in the car, bed, and during the chase for example) is riveting. Damsel in distress Domino is one of the best Bond girls in the series as well. She’s beautiful, essential to the plot, and very important in bringing down Largo.

    John Barry composes a master score for this film, with the blasting 007 theme used very effectively and many of his other cues as well. I like Tom Jones’ title song, but I equally enjoy Dionne Warwick’s version of the alternate theme just as much.

    A negative aspect of the film is perhaps a few (much less than what some say) slow scenes underwater, the SPECTRE crew covering up the Vulcan underwater being the main culprit. Other than that, this film takes you on a ride and doesn’t let up until the end.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by Scottlee

    A beautifully shot film, and very much the highlight for me of the Connery era. Great villains, great direction (some say ‘overlong’ at times, but I disagree), great plot, great everything. I particularly enjoy the underwater battle near the end, Volpe’s death scene, and the health residence sequence. Domino Derval looks fantastic, too. It’s just one long wonderful cinematic experience this film.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by SPECTRE ASSASSIN

    A huge spectacle of a film. Just a pure class and sophiscated film. Well done Terence Young! The locations are mesmerizing, and the film is well cast.

    Claudine Auger by far is my favorite Bond girl of all time. Her role as a young woman caught in web of deceit and danger is one of the more believable Bond girls.

    Lucianna Paluzzi is equally good as the venomous, yet alluring Fiona Volpe. And Adolfo Celi as Largo ranks to be in my top 10 in the rogue gallery.

    I particulary like how the film was presented. Everything is filmed on a grand-scale, from the production design, to the cinematography, to the music, to the battle scenes and the gadgets.

    Though the film isn’t perfect. Sean Connery is charming as always, but he does look a bit uninterested in some scenes. And though the length of the film had run its course a little bit, this film still stands out.

    ‘Thunderball’ -by tdalton

    SPECTRE returns in Thunderball after an abscence in the previous film, Goldfinger. There plot this time around is, however, much more dangerous than in From Russia with Love and Dr. No.

    The hijacking of two NATO nuclear warheads was a threat that was very realisitc for a Bond film. In many ways, Thunderball was the end of an era for the Bond films, in that all of the films prior to and including TB, the plotlines were all very realistic or at least plausible, and the action was generally realistic or kept within the realm of possibility. This would change in the next film, You Only Live Twice, would skip On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, begin again with Diamonds Are Forever and not end until For Your Eyes Only brought back the realistic action and plotline.

    When Bond is called in for the briefing on the hijacking of the warheads, and we see him enter a large room filled with the other Double-oh agents, the audience knows right away the scope and the severity of the situation. No other Bond film, prior or since, has ever given the audience the sense that if the agents fail, the world may come to an end. This is achieved in Thunderball, and it adds a tension that is felt throughout the film until the climax.

    The locations on Thunderball are also the most exotic they have been in the series up until that point. Nassau is a very beautiful place and is exactly the type of place that a Bond movie should take place in.

    Adolfo Celi is brilliant as Emilio Largo (much better than his counterpart Maximillian Largo in the farce Never Say Never Again). Claudine Auger is also very good as Domino. Not the best Bond girl in the series, but a very good and memorable one nonetheless.

    Thunderball also marks SPECTRE’s emergence as a legitimate threat to Bond and the world. The organization begins a string of regular appearances in Bond films that would last four consecutive films, easily the most time a villian has recurred in the Bond series. It is the nuclear blackmail plot that gives SPECTRE the attention of the world and gives Bond an arch nemesis to pursue.

  7. 'Casino Royale' Moving to Prague

    By Tim Roth on 2005-05-07

    In July 2004 Variety
    reported
    that Eon Productions are looking to film Casino Royale in the capital of the Czech Republic, Prague. However, there was no official confirmation. Later it was reported that Michael G. Wilson visited Prague for private reasons.

    Three days ago, fellow website
    Absolutely James Bond
    reported that it has been brought to their attention “that it is pretty much
    definite that some of Casino Royale will in fact be shot in Prague.” Today, the
    German James Bond Club
    goes a step further and confirms that there will be no shooting in Pinewood at
    all. Instead, the whole production is moving to Prague. CBn’s own sources have now verified this news.

    While there is no further information given, it is likely that Casino Royale
    will be shot in the legendary Barrandov studios. The 1931 built, 9254 m² big
    studios are the biggest ones of the Czech Republic. Several Hollywood movies
    were shot in Prague over the last 5 years, including Sean Connery’s League of
    Extraordinary Gentlemen
    , Hugh Jackman’s Van Helsing and Roman Polanski’s Oliver
    Twist
    . New Bond distributor Sony has also shot a bunch of films there, Vin
    Diesel’s XXX is the best-known.

    Barrandov Studios in Prague

    Barrandov Studios in Prague

    One can only speculate about the reasons for moving to Prague.
    Nothing’s been confirmed yet, but it seems that  Barrandov studios are much
    cheaper than legendary Pinewood. Additionally, taxes are not as high as in
    Britain.

    In a recent interview with

    Prague Post
    , director Roman Polanski called Barrandov studios, “The best studios I
    have ever shot in. I have worked in practically all of the studios of the world
    and at least visited many of them, and I think this is the finest. This is
    really an exceptional tool in our profession. Nowhere else could we have made the film in such a way as we
    did here.”

    Barrandov is unique in Europe, for having one of the
    largest back lots where outdoor sets can be constructed right next to the
    studios for indoor sets.

    Keep watching CBn for all the latest news on Casino Royale.

    Related Articles:

  8. CBn Reviews 'Goldfinger'

    By Devin Zydel on 2005-05-06

    Over the last several months, members of the CBn Forum have been reviewing all the James Bond films in the “Countdown Threads“. If you wish to join in on the forum discussion all you have to do is register. Now here are some select reviews, varying in opinions, of Goldfinger

    ‘Goldfinger’ -by BondIsMoore

    'Goldfinger' litho by Jeff Marshall

    ‘Goldfinger’ litho by Jeff Marshall

    The classic Goldfinger. This is the film that set the standard for James Bond. Every Bond film that came after Goldfinger had to have what Goldfinger had. A main charasmatic villian, a henchmen with a distinct quality, The bond girl, The car, The big stunts, etc. The movie starts off really quick with a great pre-title sequence and then immediatly gets us familiar with the character Goldfinger. We move from Miami Beach to Switzerland to Kentucky. The film also has the memorable and often duplicated Q scene. This was the first scene with Q in the shop and it’s the best one. The ending is great with the raid on fort Knox and the final fight on the plane with Goldfinger. This film is described in one word, Classic!

    By this time, Sean Connery has perfectly fit into the role of Bond and deleivers a great performance. Honor Blackman is fantastic as Pussy Galore and is one of the toughest Bond girls IMO. Gert Forbe looked exactly the way Goldfinger should look. Fat and blonde. Harold Sakata as Odd Job is really the best henchmen of the early Bonds, until Jaws showed up.

    Classic once again. I knew the theme song before i even heard of Bond. Just classic Bond. The score of the movie holds up really well especially in the opening scene.

    Goldfinger took what was great about the first two and just made it bigger. Bond became more of a superhero after this and after more then 30 years since it was made, the film still stands as one of the greatest action films ever.

    ‘Goldfinger’ -by brendan007

    While I don’t hate the film, I hate the fact that it’s constantly ranked so highly (usually by non-Bond fans just so they sound like they know what they are talking about). It’s a solid little Bond film, but it has not aged well at all (some scenes look like Get Smart).

    It may have created the Bond formula, but other movies do it better.

    ‘Goldfinger’ -by K1Bond007

    One of the rarest times in cinema history that someone can actually say the film is better than the book. Instead of breaking into Fort Knox to steal all the gold, an unfeasible plot which is in the novel, Auric Goldfinger breaks into Fort Knox and attempts to detonate a nuclear warhead so as to increase the value of his gold. Goldfinger has the introduction of the Aston Martin DB5, Bond’s most famous car which is later used in Thunderball, GoldenEye, a small cameo in Tomorrow Never Dies, and is the basis for the car in Die Another Day (ejector seat). The action, the gadgets, the soundtrack, the first theme song to be performed by Shirley Bassey (and her best)– Goldfinger is essentially the mold for every future James Bond film.

    ‘Goldfinger’ -by Moonraker

    This film is the most overrated Bond film of all. It has its good qualities but now it seems out of date and boring. The action is great and the characters are ok, but some sequences get on my nerves (Stud Farm). Its an OK film but I can’t see why it gets so much attention.

    ‘Goldfinger’ by Qwerty

    While Goldfinger is often cited as the best Bond film or perhaps the most well-known Bond film, in my opinion, it really isn’t the greatest Bond film. Sean Connery is most definitely on par as James Bond.

    Goldfinger and Pussy Galore are standouts in their respected categories, that is for sure. The plot of the film is also pretty well-developed, and the idea not to steal the gold is a good twist. The problem I sometimes have with this film is that it seems overrated. Certain parts in this one, meeting with M, and some of the later driving just seem to drag at times.

    Still, we have a terrific score and title song, and an overall good film.

    ‘Goldfinger’ -by Tarl_Cabot

    The Bond film I’d show Aliens if I had to pick just one Bond film that adequately encapsulates what the world of James Bond is all about.

    ‘Goldfinger’ -by trumanlodge89

    In my opinion, the best of all the “lighthearted” Bond films. Sean Connery is his best in this film. Ruthless but charming, deadly but restrained. And Auric Goldfinger. He is my second favorite villian (behind Telly Sevalas’ blofeld). He has the best lines given to a villian in the entire series. Honor Blackman as Pussy Galore is wonderful, setting the bar high for every Bond girl to come.

    Of course, many people say that this film became the “formula” for the typical Bond film, but I really dont see it. I think it is unlike any other. Bond is a prisoner for most of the movie. He is helpless. Yes, he appeals to Ms. Galore, but other than that, Goldfinger’s plan unraveling is his own arrogance. Bond is a spy in this movie, and not a superhero.

    Love the music as well. The score, the title theme, its all good.

    There really isn’t anything I don’t like about this movie.

  9. Variety: How UA Bonded With Bond

    By Guest writer on 2005-05-05

    That was a beautiful insert that Sony recently took in Variety welcoming MGM into its corporate family. The logo was there, the library was there.

    Not surprisingly, the MGM management wasn’t and, sadly, the words United Artists were nowhere to be seen. The company that had delivered James Bond to the world’s cinema — clearly the biggest asset MGM had capitalized on in recent years — had been deleted from our industry with a single wave of corporate rebranding.

    How could this have happened to the great company that I worked for and loved during its glory years in the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s?

    The Arthur Krim-Robert Benjamin philosophy that reinvented the Chaplin/Pickford company was simple.

    The film and the filmmaker are more important than the financier and the distributor. By giving over creative control, the world’s great talents came to our door and we knew how to treat them. When Transamerica acquired the publicly traded UA in the late ’60s the company’s fate was sealed. I left in the early ’70s and Krim and Benjamin formed Orion shortly thereafter.

    Transamerica, clueless, took it over only to see it flounder quickly and sold it. Thus began a series of sales, stock exchanges and management shuffles.

    What never changed were the great films and filmmakers left behind. And this is just a short list: Wilder, Wyler, Truffaut, Bertolucci, Malle, Lester, Leone, Jewison, Bergman, Kramer and De Broca. “Last Tango in Paris,” “Some Like it Hot,” “Hard Day’s Night,” “Midnight Cowboy,” “The Pink Panther,” “In the Heat of the Night,” “Tom Jones” — and James Bond.

    And about Bond, here’s the true story that started in 1961 and came full circle only a few weeks ago.

    In 1961, as a young production exec at UA, I read the Bond books and tried to acquire them for the company. MCA, Ian Fleming’s London agent, advised they weren’t for sale. A year later, now head of production and marketing, I was called by our London office and told Harry Saltzman and Cubby Broccoli were flying to New York for a meeting about something important. A few days later they walked into Krim’s office and shook hands with him, Benjamin and me.

    After the usual pleasantries I was leaning back in my chair when they announced they owned the rights to Bond. Harry had acquired a free option from Fleming (we never found out how he got it) and Cubby had become Harry’s partner, not wanting to take the chance that he himself might not get the rights when Harry’s option ran out.

    My chair hit the floor and I said in no uncertain terms that we would make a deal and that the KEY to the film was spending enough money to maintain Fleming’s tone in the sensuality, style, action and wit of the books.

    Harry and Cubby had no idea that we knew the material, but they knew I “got it.” We worked out the deal very quickly. Since they had options on all the books as well as non-author written sequels (except for “Casino Royale” which was owned by Gregory Ratoff and Columbia), we made a deal for all the pictures in groups of two, cross-collateralized them, etc. It didn’t take long.

    When we finished, Cubby said he had to make a phone call just to clear the decks. “Clear what decks?” I asked. “Columbia,” he said. “They’ve been very good to me and I owe them a final call. They said no once but I’ve got to give them a last shot.”

    When he saw my face, he said, “Don’t worry.” I felt like Jack Benny. “I worry, I worry,” I said. “I’ll just make a quick call,” Cubby responded.

    And he left the room. In less than five minutes — a very long five minutes, I might add — he returned with a smile on his face.

    “We have a deal,” he said. He told me he called Abe Montague, who was head of Columbia distribution. Abe said he’s heard about those Victor (!!!) Fleming pictures and was sure Columbia would give Cubby $400,000 or so to make one if he felt strongly about it, but only as a courtesy. Cubby said thanks and hung up.

    So we made our deal agreeing to spend $1.1 million when the script was approved (the final cost was some $1.4 million) and an unknown was hired to play Bond so that we could get a long-term deal with whomever in case we got lucky, 50/50 on the profits, etc.

    And in those days that’s all it took. And so it began. “Dr. No,” “From Russion With Love,” “Goldfinger,” “Thunderball.” In 1967 Columbia made “Casino Royale” into a spoof that did not do well.

    The Hollywood ending is that Columbia could have had Bond for $1 million in 1962. They didn’t get it then, but they’ve got it now for … how many billions did they say?

    And how about a thank you to the late, great United Artists.

    – By David Picker, Variety

    (Indie producer David Picker served as a top exec at United Artists, Paramount and Columbia overseeing such pics as “A Hard Day Night,” “Midnight Cowboy” and “Lenny” as well as the Bond film series. He is currently chairman of the Producers Guild East.)

  10. Craig's 'Casino' Connections

    By Matt Weston on 2005-05-04

    Daniel Craig, star of Layer Cake and a much-touted candidate for the role of James Bond, has spoken candidly about his association with Casino Royale.

    Daniel Craig

    Daniel Craig

    The media has recently been swamped with rumours suggesting Craig had landed the part, resulting in an initial denial from the actor’s camp. However, the latest interviews to emerge have suggested that casting for the role of 007 has fallen into a state of paralysis, as Pierce Brosnan put it when Eon opted not to renew his contract for the new film.

    Speaking with HoustonChronicle.com, the actor appeared very coy about his current position with the role. “If I was to be [Bond], and I’m not saying I am, I couldn’t tell you anyway. Believe me, I couldn’t tell you. So the answer is … I’m in a group of names. It’s a high-class problem to have.”

    “But I do know them and I have talked to them, but there’s no decision made as yet,” said Craig.

    However, in an interview with IGN.com, Craig addressed the subject in surprising detail, suggesting conflict between the studio and Eon over casting for the film. “It was a surreal time to have the studio phoning you up saying you’ve got the job and then the Broccolis saying nothing,” said Craig. “I just let it go. I’m a big believer that if they want you? you don’t want to fight, you want to all be on the same page from the very beginning. I think I would have probably been a bit too radical for it.”

    “I don’t know what the deal is [with Bond], I don’t know,” continued Craig. “There’s a lot of rumours floating around. It’s not a bad position to be in … There’s been some sort of move in my direction but there’s been a move in a lot of people’s direction. Possibly it’s a way of trying to raise debate. They throw out some names and then people start discussing it and then they can make a decision.”

    So would Craig accept if offered the role? “I don’t know. That’s the truth of it, I really don’t know. It would be difficult not to give it really serious thought.”

    Craig, 37, has starred in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, Road to Perdition and The Jacket. The actor is also said to be a personal friend of Bond producer Barbara Broccoli.

    Craig can currently be seen in Layer Cake, directed by Matthew Vaughn, who also had a brush with Casino Royale, before GoldenEye‘s Martin Campbell signed onto the project. Also speaking to IGN.com, Vaughn’s statements of creative differences between the studio and Eon echoed those of Craig.

    “It was a strange situation,” said Vaughn. “The truth of the matter is I was offered it by MGM but not by the Broccolis. There was smoke or there was fire.”

    Cameras are set to roll on Casino Royale early next year for a November 2006 release.

    Related Articles: