CommanderBond.net
  1. Tarantino Wants A Shot At Bond

    By johncox on 2004-05-15

    Quentin Tarantino has told reporters at the Cannes Film Festival (where he is president of this year’s film festival jury) that he will formally approach Eon Productions with his concept of making “Bond 21” a Fleming-faithful adaptation of Casino Royale once he finishes worldwide promotion for Kill Bill – Volume 2.

    “I’ve always wanted to do it,” said Tarantino. “I bumped into Pierce Brosnan and we talked about it. He liked the idea. I would like to do the original book Casino Royale and do it more or less the way the Ian Fleming book is. I don’t know if they’re going to go for it or not, but I’m letting them know I’m interested.”

    This is hardly the first time the director has expressed interest in making Ian Fleming’s first novel into a film. Tarantino first floated the idea in 1996, saying that he’d like to make the movie in B&W, and even use voice over narration so he could incorporate some of Fleming’s original text.

    But Eon Productions, producers of the James Bond films, have thus far expressed little interest in a Tarantino directed James Bond film, preferring instead to work with lesser-known, non-American directors. Bringing in an auteur such as Tarantino would certainly bring a dash of revisionist “art” to the Bond franchise, but would also require the old-school producers to surrender more creative control than they are accustomed. This, at the end of the day, might be what keeps Tarantino from realizing his Bond ambitions.

    Tarantino’s pitch may also be coming a bit late. Eon has already dispatched screenwriters Neal Purvis and Robert Wade (The World is Not Enough, Die Another Day) to write the screenplay for the yet untitled “Bond 21”, and MGM Vice Chairman Chris McGurk has stated that the film is on track for a 2005 release and that decisions as to who will direct and who will play Bond will be made “in the next few months.”

    The wild card in all this could be the possible sale of MGM studios. According to reports, MGM is in negotiations with Sony Pictures Entertainment, who along with financing partners, have put up a $5 billion bid for the studio. Should the sale go through, Sony executives might have a say in the development of “Bond 21,” making a sudden change of course a distinct possibility.

    Back at Cannes, the never press shy Tarantino seems newly embolden by the idea of directing a James Bond film. Likening the big-budget franchise to one of cinema’s hardest to conquer peaks, the director says, “Now is the time to climb Mount Everest.”


    Related articles:

  2. Reuters: Sony And Partners Go After MGM
  3. MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21
  4. Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” Appears in Industry Production Chart
  5. Tarantino’s Bond Bid
  6. The Fleming Blueprint: Casino Royale
  7. Casino Royale: Who is this guy?

    To discuss this news visit this thread in the CBn Forums.

  • Tarantino's "Casino Royale" Appears in Industry Production Chart

    By johncox on 2004-05-07

    Filmmaker Quentin Tarantino (Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill) has for years expressed a desire to make a faithful adaptation of Ian Fleming’s first James Bond novel Casino Royale. Ideas the director has floated in the past have included shooting the movie in black and white, and even using voice over narration in order to incorporate Fleming’s text. Most recently Tarantino has said he would cast the potentially ousted Pierce Brosnan as his Bond, and Uma Thurman as Bond Girl Vesper Lynd.

    Brosnan has endorsed Tarantino’s approach (which should come as no surprise considering how badly he wants one last shot at playing 007), but Eon Productions and MGM have remained publicly quite on the matter, saying only that Bond 21 is on track for a 2005 release, and that decisions as to who will direct, and who will play 007, will be made “in the next few months.” [See: MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21]

    But now Quentin’s Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” is appearing in a respected online movie industry production database, Production Weekly (a subscription service), as a “development” project under Tarantino’s A Band Apart production company banner.


    “CASINO ROYALE” Feature Film
    A BAND APART
    7966 Beverly Blvd., 3rd Fl., Los Angeles, CA 90048
    PHONE – [edited for privacy] FAX – [edited for privacy]
    STATUS – Development
    DIRECTOR: Quentin Tarantino CAST: Pierce Brosnan
    Sir James Bond is enjoying his retirement when four international agents press him into service again in hopes of smashing SMERSH and Topple LeChiffre at the baccarat tables. Bond is taken in by Agent Mimi (alias Lady Fiona McTarry) who immediately falls in love with him. Bond’s illegitimate daughter, Mata Bond, whose mother was the late Mata Hari, is going to help out. The current agent using the Bond name, Cooper, has his hands full, despite his assistance by beautiful secretary, Moneypenny. 007’s nephew Jimmy Bond is supposedly incompetent. Bond, hoping to clear his name from its current low repute, hires Evelyn Tremble to meet LeChiffre at the gambling tables at Casino Royale. The world’s richest agent, Vesper Lynd, helps convince Tremble to masquerade as 007.


    Does this mean the Tarantino “Casino” is going ahead? Might we get another “Battle of the Bonds” in 2005?

    Not likely.

    Eon/MGM now hold the rights to Casino Royale, awarded to them after the 1997 court battle with Sony Pictures (who now own Columbia, the studio that made the 1967 Casino Royale with David Niven). Despite the presumption of the listing, A Band Apart cannot adapt the book, remake the ’67 film, nor even use the character of James Bond in anyway. Eon and MGM hold all cinematic rights to the character of James Bond. Period.

    It’s more likely that Tarantino (who is never press-shy) is putting his ideas out there in the hopes of swaying Eon into a co-production of some kind. It’s also possible that the listing was generated by an over-zealous fan, or an industry professional who picked up on the numerous Quentin/Casino stories and included the listing without realizing that the director doesn’t actually own the rights. Further suspicion is raised by the fact that the plot outline on this listing is that of the 1967 farce — hardly the faithful adaptation of Fleming that Tarantino has spoken of in the past.

    Nevertheless, with two such headline-grabbing names as Quentin Tarantino and James Bond, no doubt the rumors will continue. But unless Eon announces a co-production with the famous filmmaker, Bond fans should not expect to see Quentin Tarantino’s “Casino Royale” anytime soon.


    Related articles:

  • Tarantino’s Bond Bid

    To discuss this news visit this thread in the CBn Forums.

  • The Men Who Could Be Bond

    By Athena Stamos on 2004-05-02

    With MGM Vice Chairman Chris McGurk saying that there will be a decision as to who will be James Bond “in the next few months” (MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21), speculation as to who will play 007 in Bond 21 has been running wild. Will Pierce Brosnan come back for one last outing, or will we see an all-new actor in the role? As we wait for an official announcement, do the lists on IMDB of the leading candidate’s upcoming projects offer any clues as to who will be wearing Bond’s tux in 2005? Here’s a look…

    (Bond 21 is currently set for a late 2005 release, which means filming would take place in late 2004 and/or early 2005)


    Orlando Bloom
    He currently has two films set for release in 2005 (Kingdom of Heaven and Elizabethtown) and one set for 2006 (Pirates of the Caribbean 2). Seeing as Kingdom of Heaven (2005) is currently being filmed… there are two scenarios. If Elizabethtown is filmed in late 2004 / early 2005 and Pirates of the Caribbean 2 is filmed in late 2005, then he probably won’t have time to fit Bond 21 (2005) in. But if Elizabethtown‘s filming doesn’t conflict with Bond 21’s filming and Pirates of the Caribbean 2 is set for late 2006 instead of early 2006 (being filmed in early 2006), then he will indeed have time for Bond 21.

    Pierce Brosnan
    He has two films, excluding Bond 21, set for release in 2005 (Instant Karma and Mexicali). He’s currently filming The Matador which means that Instant Karma will probably be filmed in late 2004 and Mexicali will film before or after Bond 21 in 2005. Bond 21 is listed in his current films, but notice the cast list is just the 3 Bond characters who carry over from film to film – M, Q, & Bond. I think he is definitely making room for it if the roll is offered to him again.

    Colin Farrell
    He currently has two films listed for release in 2005 (The New World and Ask the Dust). From the looks of it, it’s possibly that both will be filming in 2005 and therefore it would be a tight squeeze if he were to add Bond 21 into his schedule.

    Mel Gibson
    He has one film listed for release in 2005 (Mad Max: Fury Road). From the looks of it, it seems possible that the filming of Mad Max would conflict with the filming of Bond 21.

    Hugh Jackman
    His last project listed is Van Helsing (2004, currently in theaters). He is not yet listed for X-Men 3 (2006)… is he holding out for something else? You’d think being Wolverine that his negotiations would have been one of the first to be taken care of. Even if he does get signed for X-Men 3 (2006) filming would take place in late 2005 / early 2006). He is also performing in a Broadway play, The Boy From Oz, but the show will end it’s season in September 2004. So, knowing this… he could in fact work both X-Men 3 and Bond 21 into his schedule.

    Jude Law
    He currently has one film listed for release in 2005 (Dexterity). Oddly enough he has seven films coming out this year, two being filmed in 2004 and the rest in post-production. And now suddenly he only have one film for 2005, maybe he has something up his sleeve? He definitely has the room for Bond 21 in his schedule.

    Heath Ledger
    He has three films set for release in 2005 (Nautica, Brokeback Mountain, andCasanova). So from the looks of things his time is taken up for 2004-2006, therefore it’s highly unlikely that he would be able to work in Bond 21 for a 2005 release.

    Ewan McGregor
    He has one film set for release in 2005 (Robots) which is currently being filmed. Then he has one film set for release in 2006 (Gnomeo and Juliet), to either be filmed in late 2005 or early 2006. So he quite possibly has the whole of 2005 open for Bond 21.

    Clive Owen
    Filming for his next film Savage Grace (2004) should start soon. This is the last film he has listed on IMDB. That leaves him with an open schedule in 2005 for Bond 21.

    George Lazenby
    His schedule is completely clear for him to accept the roll. Will he be given a second go at 007?


    To discuss this article visit this thread on the CBn Forums.

  • Brosnan Tempers Rhetoric in Recent T.V. Appearances

    By johncox on 2004-05-02

    Pierce Brosnan, who has been waging somewhat of a PR war with James Bond producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli over his future as 007, has dramatically tempered his rhetoric in his latest television appearances promoting his new film, Laws of Attraction. While print interviews still contain Pierce’s oft-quoted statements that “The producers are in a state of paralysis,” and “They don’t know what to do,” Pierce all but avoided discussing James Bond in two recent high-profile T.V. appearances on The Tonight Show With Jay Leno (April 29) and The Tavis Smiley Show (April 30).

    On The Tonight Show With Jay Leno — certainly the largest T.V. audience of Pierce’s Laws of Attraction press tour — Pierce said nothing about James Bond. The only mention of Bond came as part of a Leno joke (he asked Pierce if when he was dating he used the line “I’m Remington Steele” or “I’m James Bond’”). On PBS’s The Tavis Smiley Show, host Smiley, who again and again said that he was a “huge” James Bond fan, got little from Pierce on the current state of affairs. In the provocative interview — in which Pierce spoke of his environmental concerns and even called the current U.S. administration “men of war” — the subject of James Bond was left until the very end. Here Pierce simply shrugged and said, “I’m not sure where it’s gonna go from here, but, it’s been good.” [Read the complete transcript of the interview here.] Pierce did give his standard “paralysis” speech on ABC’s The View, but it appears this show was taped before the Leno and Smiley interviews.

    Does this sudden lack of Bond talk indicate some sort of change in the current situation? Is it resignation on Pierce’s part that the role is, indeed, going to another actor, or does it indicate a possible resumption of talks? Or perhaps Brosnan is simply trying to keep the interviews focused on Laws of Attraction (which opened #4 at the box office this weekend) and away from the always enticing topic of James Bond.

    MGM Vice Chairman Chris McGurk has stated that Bond 21 is on schedule for 2005 and that a decision as to who will play Bond will be made “in the next few months.”

    Stay tuned.


    Related articles:

  • Brosnan Confirms The Producers Are Talking to Jackman & Owen
  • Bitter Brosnan: “Negotiations have now ceased.”

  • MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21

  • Brosnan ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’
  • Pierce Keeps Pressure on Bond Producers

  • ‘…I don’t know what’s going to happen. I have no idea.’
  • Brosnan Speaks Out in Detail on His Future as Bond

  • Pierce Brosnan A Little Frazzled?

  • Brosnan: “My Future As 007 Is Opaque”

  • Eon Says That Brosnan is Bond ‘For Now’
  • LICENCE REVOKED
  • Brosnan’s Head is on the Block?

    To discuss this news visit this thread in the CBn Forums.
    Thanks to “Mr. Asterix” for The Tonght Show info.

  • Brosnan Confirms The Producers Are Talking to Jackman & Owen

    By Guest writer on 2004-04-27

    Written by: Matt Weston (aka: [dark])
    To discuss this news visit this thread on the CBn Forums.


    In an interview with Cinema Confidential, Pierce Brosnan has not only confirmed that the 007 producers are talking to other actors for the role of James Bond in the yet-to-be-named Bond 21, but has also named names!

    When asked if there was another actor he thought the producers would go with, Brosnan revealed that the producers had been speaking to both Hugh Jackman and Clive Owen about overtaking the role. The actors received Brosnan’s blessing, after he claimed they are both “fantastic” actors.

    Aside from this admission, Brosnan’s talk of Bond was not unlike the usual mumbo-jumbo we’ve been hearing from him lately, as he spoke of the producers’ paralysis, and that they do not know which direction to take.

    Q: Where does the new Bond film stand right now?

    PIERCE: It doesn’t stand anywhere. I don’t know what’s happening. There’s a paralysis that has come upon the producers. They don’t know whether to go forwards, backwards, sideways – I don’t know. As far as I’m concerned, I’ve honored my contract of doing four [Bond] movies. They know where to find me if they want me for the fifth.

    Q: Is there someone else do you think that could be the next Bond?

    PIERCE: Oh, there will always be someone else. If I was the fifth [Bond], there can always be a sixth.

    Q: Is there another actor you think they will go with?

    PIERCE: Yeah, I mean they’ve talked to Hugh Jackman and to Clive Owen – both actors are really fantastic and have the chops for it. I have no idea. I really don’t concern myself. I don’t lose sleep over it. I don’t wake up thinking, you know, ‘Am I going to be the next Bond?’ or ‘Is someone else going to be the next Bond.’ I have to let that one go, I really wouldn’t do myself any justice if I would lose sleep over it. If it’s the end of the ride, then so be it. I can move on and make films like “Evelyn,” “Thomas Crown,” or this movie… The movie has put me on a landscape on an international level, and for an actor, that’s a magnificent gift to have.

    For the full interview, in which Brosnan discusses Laws of Attraction, After the Sunset and life with his family, click here.

  • Bitter Brosnan: "Negotiations have now ceased."

    By johncox on 2004-04-25

    Pierce Brosnan is being much less “opaque” these days about his standoff with producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson over his future as James Bond. Back in February, CBn and MKKBB reported that negotiations between producers and the star had ceased. When questioned, Brosnan has been evasive as to his status, choosing to use the word “opaque” and hinting that the series itself was in a state of “paralysis.”

    But in an interview published today in the Boston Herald (Law’-breaker: Pierce Brosnan shakes up perfect image with new romantic comedy), the clearly bitter Brosnan confirmed that negotiations have indeed ceased, and while not offering much new in the way of specific details, he did speak more candidly about the situation than he has before.

    The following excerpt is from the Boston Herald:

    If “Laws of Attraction” does its work, Brosnan won’t have to worry about his status as 007. He had expected to be preparing for nine months of filming for his fifth turn as the world’s most famous secret agent. Instead, he’s heading to Mexico City to work with Greg Kinnear and Hope Davis (“American Splendor'”) on an edgy, low-budget comedy for DreamTime.

    “All I know is before I went on the last promotion for the Bond: Die Another Day, I’d done my contract, my four movies,” he said. “They said they wanted to do a fifth, and we started negotiations, and those negotiations have now ceased. Where does that leave me? How do I answer this question?”

    If this looks like some kind of a publicity ploy, Brosnan makes it clear that’s hardly the case. He is clearly upset.

    “It would be nice to have the respect for the people you have worked hard for to give an honest answer,” he said. “It would be nice to have it on level ground. But nobody knows. I wish I could be more specific and say, ‘No, they’re going to look for somebody else. My time is up; they’ve found somebody else.’ I can’t say that, and at the same time I can’t say, ‘Well, we’re going ahead,’ because they said, ‘We don’t have the script. We don’t know what to do.'”

    Rumors always have been part and parcel of the 007 franchise. As Brosnan notes, a spinoff film with Halle Berry’s Jinx was going to be made.

    “That went pfft! To look for the truth, you have to go to MGM. Good luck! You have to go to the Broccolis. Even greater luck,” he said.

    As to the present impasse, Brosnan said, “You try to answer as specifically and as honestly as possible because I don’t have anything to hide. But I don’t know what’s going on, except they don’t know how to deal with it.”

    Last night Fox New Channel, in a report on Brosnan’s future as 007, also stated that negotiations have “ended.”


    Thanks to [dark] for the Boston Hearld alert, and “johnboy007” for the Fox News alert..
    You can discuss this topic in the Bond 21 forums.

    Related articles:

  • MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21

  • Brosnan ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’
  • Pierce Keeps Pressure on Bond Producers

  • ‘…I don’t know what’s going to happen. I have no idea.’
  • Brosnan Speaks Out in Detail on His Future as Bond

  • Pierce Brosnan A Little Frazzled?

  • Brosnan: “My Future As 007 Is Opaque”

  • Eon Says That Brosnan is Bond ‘For Now’
  • LICENCE REVOKED
  • Brosnan’s Head is on the Block?
  • Films / 2006 - Casino Royale

    MGM Vice Chairman Talks Bond 21

    By Guest writer on 2004-04-20

    Rumours have been swirling wildly regarding as-yet-untitled Bond 21, ever since that Daily Mail article earlier this year. Brosnan’s in, Brosnan’s out, Brosnan wants to do it, Brosnan’s sick of doing it, Britney’s in, Britney’s out. The more astute people can pick the serious stuff from the serious fluff.

    But the Brosnan debacle is the word on everybody’s lips. Until now, Eon and MGM have declined to speak on the matter, aside from a brief snippet from an Eon spokesperson claiming that Brosnan was still "their Bond", and that they had not said anything to convince otherwise. Almost all of what Bond fans have been reading has come from the mouth of James Bond himself, Pierce Brosnan (or his friend and neighbour, "Die Another Day" co-star, Michael Madsen).

    Until now.

    MGM vice chairman and COO Chris McGurk has spoken to Variety about the current state of Bond 21.

    According to McGurk – and contrary to recent rumours – Bond 21 is still scheduled to begin production "early next year", with a view to a probable November 2005 release. With Neal Purvis and Robert Wade hard at work on a script, McGurk commented on the rumoured creative differences between Eon and MGM (rumours that were only fuelled by MGM’s axing of the Halle Berry-led Jinx spin-off).

    "Like any good production relationship between top-tier producers and a studio, you’re always going to have disagreements," he said. "We had a lot of disagreements on the last Bond, and they all got sorted out to everybody’s satisfaction."

    McGurk said that aside from the fact that no 007 is currently linked to the picture, it’s business as usual for the Bond franchise.

    "All creative decisions are mutual between the studio and the producers. They make recommendations and both sides can say yea or nay. We’re going to go through the same process on this one."

    According to McGurk, decisions about a director, and the actor who will play James Bond, will be made "in the next few months."

    This news item has been written by CBn forum regular Matt Weston, known as “[dark]” – Many thanks!
    Feel free to discuss this topic in this thread in CBn’s Bond 21 forums!

  • Films / 2006 - Casino Royale

    Brosnan ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’

    By Evan Willnow on 2004-04-17

    Appearing in an interview on HBO’s ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’, to plug his new movie Laws Of Attraction Pierce Brosnan speaks of playing the role of James Bond, and gives Costas a hint of the future.

    Unfortunately, the questions on the top of everyone’s mind were asked off camera, but Costas shared some of the answers with the audience. Costas: ‘I asked about doing a fifth Bond movie and his answer was non-commital though he did say with an enticing script he’d be willing to suit up again.’ Costas also gave us this bit, ‘ [Brosnan told me] that he thought Jackman would make an excellent choice.’

    On camera Brosnan could not avoid Costas’ questions about Bond. On his predessors Brosnan says ‘Connery, he’s the one who casts the big shadow. Roger Moore was fantastic but for me as an actor there was only one man to take the belt from—to get in the ring with—was to face Connery. He was a huge hero of mine.’

    And on Dalton, ‘When you read the books [Bond’s] a very kind of dark character and Tim Dalton really did a darn good job, but the public didn’t want that. They didn’t want that sombre Bond.’

    A humourous moment came when Brosnan tells Costas of his first meeting with Sean Connery, ‘I saw him there about four years ago breifly one morning as I was closing the trunk of the car, there he was. (In Connery voice) “Pierce, good morning. Are they paying you enough money?” (back in his own voice) “Ah… Sean hey how you doing?” and then he was gone. He’d just come down to the studio for a haircut.’

    Costas also asked, ‘Do you ever wish you could play Bond back in the From Russia With Love or Dr. No days? Before the special effect became such a big part of it.’ Pierce answered, ‘Oh yeah. I mean I think that’s what’s lacking is the character—more of the character—the stillness of the character. I’ve spoken to them about it, but I think they want to keep the big opening sequences, and they want to keep the pyrotechnics going. I would like to have much more of a thriller aspect to it. … You could still have the big bang for the buck, I think. I think you can have your cake and eat it with this.’

    Pierce’s entire interview on ‘On The Record with Bob Costas’ will be replayed through out this week on HBO and HBO2 Check your local listings.

    Discuss this story in this thread of CBn’s forums.

  • Films / 2006 - Casino Royale

    Tide of Passion

    By jcharter on 2004-04-12


    Earlier this week my friend and colleague, Tim Roth, wrote an editorial about his feelings about the way Eon is handling (or they way Eon is not handling the rumours, as Tim might say) the latest news and rumours surrounding the aptly titled Bond 21. Little did Tim know that his editorial would cause such a stir amongst the online fan community.  In an effort to fan the flames—and because I wanted to write about my views on the matter—I present a rebuttal of sorts.

    With the exception of a few rumours around the time of Die Another Day,  Eon always seems to neglect commenting on media speculation. Eon isn’t being run much differently from the days of Cubby and Dana. There is nothing new going on here, except this time around the rumour involves the man playing the main character in their franchise—Pierce Brosnan. Even this news isn’t that shocking.  Ever since Tomorrow Never Dies there has been talk of who the next James Bond will be.  Towards the middle of Roger Moore’s tenure it was never really clear if he would be back for another.  Yet, sure enough there was Roger Moore back for “just one more.” 

    Several  hardcore fans are claiming that all this speculation with no official comment is hurting Eon Productions as well as the future of James Bond, but there is a saying in Hollywood, “There is no such thing as bad publicity.” In the media, right now everyone is talking about James Bond. Sure, the news may not be great news, but it’s getting a lot of people interested—especially those that are just casual James Bond fans or those that aren’t even fans at all. I can’t see anything wrong with people showing an interest in James Bond. Certainly by the time Eon gets around to releasing Bond 21 there will be more than just the dedicated and casual fans there. There will be film fans who might have never gone to see a James Bond film. Why will they be there? Because they want to find out what all this jiggery pokery has been all about. 

    Who cares if all fans are talking about is speculation? We, the fans, aren’t in any unfamiliar territory here.  Remember when it was reported that Judi Dench wouldn’t be back as “M” following The World Is Not Enough?  Not to mention the whole re-appearance of past Bond Girls rumour that has been making the rounds every time a new film is even mentioned.  We are in the exact same situation this time as we have been in every other time a James Bond film has been in pre-production. Media agencies around the world report speculative stories and the entire fan community goes wild. Some believe the rumours and some don’t and naturally fan speculation runs rampant. Part of the fun in being a fan is reading and speculating on the latest rumours. Some fans, though, seem to want to spear Eon through the heart for not telling everyone everything they’re doing at every moment. I say calm down, sit back and enjoy the ride. Real news will be making the rounds soon enough.

    Cubby would be ashamed? No, he’d be proud. He’d be proud of his daughter and step-son for keeping his franchise alive—and extremely successful.

    Feel free to discuss this editorial in this thread in CBn’s Bond 21 forums!

  • Cubby Would Be Ashamed

    By Tim Roth on 2004-04-10



    Back in February, when CBn first reported and later verified that Brosnan was out, the fan community didn’t believe us. Pierce Brosnan himself nearly confirmed our story at the beginning of March when he said (and since then several times repeated) that his future as 007 is “opaque” and that a “certain paralysis” regarding producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson has set in. Fellow actors Michael Madsen, Dame Judi Dench and Samantha Bond have also given their opinion, and yet the only one who hasn’t commented yet is – Eon Productions, the company that produces the Bond films for 42 years.

    Eon spokeswoman Catherine McCormack commented in February on the rumours surrounding Pierce Brosnan, only admitting, “Pierce doesn’t have a contract yet.” Since then, silence.

    And with this continued silence, Eon is disgracing itself. How should one interpret their stubborn silence? Is it true what Pierce Brosnan has said several times before, that they don’t know where to go with the franchise? Is it true that they are considering a twenty-five-year-old to replace Pierce Brosnan? Is it true that after the IFP’s announcement of a Harry Potter-esque literary Bond series, that the film series should go into the same direction?

    All these rumours and questions only harm the franchise. The fans are indeed in a very “opaque land.” What else other than speculating can they do? Most trust in Pierce Brosnan, because there isn’t any official statement one can rely on. But, Brosnan has said that he has no clue what is going on, so the fans actually don’t have any idea of who to believe.

    Because of these circumstances the whole Internet fan community tends to believe in every single piece of news they get these days. When back in 2001 Quentin Tarantino said for first time that he’d be very interested in directing a Bond movie, nobody really took him seriously. People in fan forums discussed the idea, but after a week or so the topic died a heroic death.

    As of April 2004, however, Tarantino has renewed his ambitions. “Wow,” Bond fans think, “This could save the franchise! Eon, give Tarantino the job! You have already spoilt it enough!” However, one has to retain a realistic view and warn everyone away from premature conclusions.

    First: Although Eon is losing credibility these days, they haven’t spoilt anything (except “Die Another Day,” but that’s another topic ;-)). I’m pretty sure they have agreed with Brosnan or Jackman or a reindeer or whoever to play James Bond in the next flick. Purvis & Wade have confirmed that they are working on the script for the next one, so there is actually something in pre-production! Never forget that when you start talking about “another 6 year gap,” folks.

    Secondly: Quentin Tarantino would spoil the franchise. Sure, one can adore him and claim that his movies are masterpieces as quickly as one can say that his movies are absolute trash. No doubt, he has his very own style of making movies. And that’s what I fear would spoil a possible “Casino Royale”-Tarantino-Bond. Maybe he would take the franchise back to his roots as far as atmosphere concerned, but what about character (one really cannot say Tarantino is a master of character development) and a story? I don’t want to see 120 minutes in a casino in typical Tarantino slow motion. Just think of the torture scenes in Fleming’s novel. I’m pretty sure Tarantino would use them in full length. I really don’t need to see “The Passion of the Bond”. There’s nothing Bondian to it.

    Besides, I think that this bit of news is only another attempt by Pierce Brosnan to keep the pressure on the producers.

    To come back to the initial point, how can we get out of this “opaque land” and return to serious discussible news? Not that I don’t love speculation, but sometimes its just taking over. So Eon, come on! Give us our well-deserved statement. You know what? I don’t matter about its content! But please give us some kind of sign, so that we fans know that you are still alive! Otherwise one really has to become afraid.

    And furthermore, if this no-comment policy was supposed to show Pierce Brosnan that he can’t blackmail Eon, Brosnan actually has won, as fans think Eon is out of its depth.

    I beg all involved parties: Stop it! Stop it now! Don’t ruin a forty-two-year-old franchise within three months. Cubby would be ashamed.

    Feel free to discuss this editorial in this thread in CBn’s Bond 21 forums! Many thanks to Barbara K. Emanuele for her help.