CommanderBond.net
  1. Brosnan Back in 007 Talks?

    By The CBn Team on 2005-01-01

    In the latest newsletter from the James Bond International Fan Club, chairman David Black offers this cryptic new rumour regarding the seemingly never-ending saga of Pierce Brosnan and Bond 21.

    Although the media reports that Pierce has had enough of the ongoing Bond debate and ruled himself out – I have heard rumours that some further negotiations may have just taken place and he may still be back for the new film due for release in 2006. Don’t rule him out just yet – that’s all I can say on the subject!!

    This is not the first time CBn has heard this tantalizing rumour, but whether there is any truth in it remains to be seen.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Bond 21.

  2. Colin Salmon Bond #6 Betting Dismissed as Publicity Stunt

    By johncox on 2004-12-04
    Salmon at the DAD premiere

    Salmon at the DAD premiere

    A flurry of bets placed on actor Colin Salmon to replace Pierce Brosnan as the next James Bond was dismissed yesterday as a “publicity stunt,” reports The Scotsman.

    Bookmaker William Hill received “hundreds of calls” from punters eager to back Salmon, who would be the first black actor to take the role. Rival agency Ladbrokes stopped taking bets on Salmon after receiving six bets worth up to £500 each in just under an hour. Ladbrokes, fearing a sting, felt people might be using insider knowledge and cancelled betting immediately.

    Speculation was further fuelled when The Sun reported the actor had started using a “007” in his autograph.

    However, Hill believes the bets placed on Salmon with Ladbrokes are a stunt, and has given Salmon very small odds in the hope that it would deter people from placing bets on the actor.

    “We have had a number of punters backing Colin Salmon to be the next Bond,” a spokesman said. “I think that the interest shown is purely speculation and is not based on insider information. As far as we are aware a decision will not be made until the New Year.”

    Salmon appears in the Bond series as M’s chief of staff, Charles Robinson, and has stood in as 007 during Bond Girl casting sessions. At one time Brosnan did name Salmon as an ideal replacement.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Bond 21.

  3. Samantha Won't Bond with The New 007

    By Guest writer on 2004-11-16

    It looks like Samantha Bond is making good on her promise to leave the James Bond series with Pierce Brosnan… as reported today reports the Daily Record.

    Miss Moneypenny actress Samantha Bond refuses to be shaken or stirred with anyone other than veteran 007 actor Pierce Brosnan. The 41-year-old, who has been in the last four Bond movies, reckons it’s the end of the line for her association with the spy now that Pierce has handed in his licence to kill. The sexy mum-of-two thinks love scenes with actors young enough to be her sons would be just ridiculous.

    “I just don’t want to go on being Moneypenny if Pierce isn’t there,” she said. “I really don’t. It’s an age thing, for a start. Pierce is just that little bit older than me – eight years – and when he’s doing all that saucy flirting with Moneypenny, it looks OK and a lot of fun, which it is. And she, of course, has her fantasies about being with him, having a romance. It’s a gift of a role.”

    But Samantha, mum of Molly, 13, and Tom, 11, said that, if they brought in a younger guy to play 007, the sizzling sexual chemistry just wouldn’t look right. “I think it’s going to look a bit off having a nod and a wink and a flirty moment,” she said. “Not very tasteful, to my mind. In fact, it could look a bit gruesome and icky. Older lady, much younger bloke – I don’t think so. There is one guy who I might consider as an exception if he was to be cast. But I am not going to reveal who he is, and wild horses won’t get his name out of me.”

    Big names being linked to the role include Hollywood hotshots Ewan McGregor and Colin Farrell. But Samantha wondered whether either would actually want the role at this stage in their careers. “They both have highly successful careers,” she said. “Would they really want to become linked to someone like Bond, who is really such a very strong image and identity? Those two guys can do big earner films in their own right. They don’t need it. And from what I hear of Mr Farrell’s rather salty, non- compromising language, I wonder if they might have to bleep out a lot of the expletives? I’m Bond, James bleep Bond. Perhaps not. The other name being mentioned is James Purefoy. But he’s got a contract to play Mark Antony in the BBC’s TV production of Rome which will occupy the next five years, so that could be difficult to get around. And all those guys are younger than me, so…”

    Samantha had heard rumours that Irishman Pierce was retiring as Bond, but it wasn’t until she heard it from his own mouth she believed it. “When I first heard that Pierce was supposed to be calling it a day, I honestly wondered if the rumour was all part of a terribly elaborate publicity stunt,” she said. But one night Samantha and her actor husband actor Alex Hanson were watching TV when Pierce was a guest on Parkinson and confirmed it was true. She said, “We both looked at each other and said: ‘Well, he’s just said it himself, so that’s the end of the line’.”

    But Samantha isn’t bitter. She’s very grateful to have had the chance to be in the Bond films, although she does admit playing a key character like Moneypenny can be a bit of a poisoned chalice. She said, “The role might well be the only one that you are ever known for. I know that dear old Desmond Llewelyn felt that way. He believed the public only ever thought of him as Q, and that they knew nothing about his amazing body of work before he joined the 007 team. And what about the two actresses who played Moneypenny before I got the role? If you’re not very careful, playing a part as high-profile as that over a long time can put the kibosh on your career.Which is why I’ve been very careful to do a lot of other work on stage, in films and on TV. I don’t want to be typecast as Moneypenny for the rest of my life, much as I adore the lady. I’ve just been very lucky to play her in four box-office successes, and that’s it. It’s been 10 years and maybe enough is enough?”

    Samantha, who lives in London with her family, reckons being part of a Bond film is one of the most fun things an actor or actress can do. And another benefit for the busy working mum is that the Miss Moneypenny label does help pull in the punters to all the charity events she is involved with.

    Among the causes for which Sam waves a banner are Macmillan nurses, the Teenage Cancer Trust and the Shooting Star Hospice for Children. She has good reason for supporting cancer charities…. She said, ‘When I look at my two children, and my nephews and niece, who are all so well and happy, you cannot help but feel so very, very blessed and so incredibly fortunate.”

    Samantha has three new TV projects soon to air. In Murder Room, a BBC two-parter going out at the New Year, she plays a frosty woman with a terrible secret. Then there’s Donovan, in which Samantha stars with Tom Conti, andan ITV six-part comedy-drama series Distant Shores. “And that,” said Samantha with a huge grin, “is at last a piece with a bit of comedy in it. I’m Lisa, the wife of Bill, played by Peter Davison, who is a very successful, if extremely arrogant, plastic surgeon.”

    -by: Samantha Booth of The Daily Record

    Sidenote: Samantha’s son Tom was horrified to see his mother snogging James Bond in Die Another Day.

  4. "I went to them and asked about making 'Casino Royale'"

    By Tim Roth on 2004-11-14

    In an interview with The New York Times Pierce Brosnan has offered slightly more information on his departure from the Bond role.

    Asked "After four very successful movies, it seems you are no longer Bond, what happened?" Pierce replied that "I went to them and asked about making Casino Royale, which is the first Ian Fleming book. I had hooked up with Quentin Tarantino, who wanted to direct the movie. On the fifth apple martini one evening, he mentioned Casino Royale, which is the blueprint for the psyche of Bond, and I took that idea to the Broccoli family, who produce the Bond movies. They have a way of doing the films, and they are not open to discussion — they threw my idea out the window."

    When the rumours about Tarantino came up earlier this year and fans jumped on the bandwagon, demanding Tarantino as director for Bond 21, it was not known that talks between Brosnan and Tarantino were in such an advanced state. Does it also mean that Neil Purvis and Robert Wade got their motivation for using elements from Fleming’s first book from Brosnan? According to several sources, the yet-to-be-finalized script contains numerous homages to Casino Royale.

    "But they still wanted you to make a fifth film?" – "Initially. And I said I would. But then in the middle of negotiations, they changed their minds. They never offered a sound reason. I was shocked. They said they wanted to go in a new direction. But they’ve probably done me a great favor. I can now concentrate on other roles."

    The interview then goes on about After the Sunset, whereas the last question is Bond related again: "Do you have any advice for your fellow Irishman Colin Farrell, who is one of the actors mentioned to play Bond?" – Brosan: "He’s a great bad boy. If he gets it, I hope he’s prepared for a fight. Being an actor in Hollywood involves lots of things beyond acting. Charm really helps. And it’s a good idea to incorporate a little Bond into all your dealings."

    Stay tuned!

  5. Martin Campbell To Helm Bond 21?

    By Matt Weston on 2004-11-10

    In 1995, Martin Campbell introduced audiences to a new James Bond when he helmed Pierce Brosnan’s debut Bond film, GoldenEye.

    11 years later, Campbell is reportedly in talks to do it again, as The Hollywood Reporter claims negotiations with the New Zealand director are in progress.

    Two months ago, MGM announced that the yet-to-be-titled twenty-first Bond film had been delayed past its planned 2005 release date, citing a lack of a director and, of course, 007 himself. However, The Hollywood Reporter reports that Campbell signing onto the project would certainly set the film on track for 2006 release.

    According to the trade, Campbell has been under consideration alongside Paul McGuigan (Wicker Park) and Matthew Vaughn (Layer Cake), both of whom were revealed to have been considered when MGM postponed the new film.

    Campbell, whose pre-007 credits consisted predominantly of TV programmes and telemovies (including Reilly: The Ace of Spies and The Professionals), was put on the directorial map with his critically-acclaimed Bond film, and has since gone on to direct a number of mainstream outings, including The Mask of Zorro, Beyond Borders and Vertical Limit, starring GoldenEye‘s Izabella Scorupco. He’s currently filming the Zorro sequel, due for release in 2005, after which, his schedule appears clear.

    Should Campbell sign on for the new film, he would be the first Bond director to return to the series since John Glen’s five-time run throughout the 1980s.

    The Hollywood Reporter article also notes that the next script (penned by Neal Purvis and Robert Wade, who wrote the last two Bond films, as well as the ill-fated Jinx spin-off) “is said to contain more of the elements of earlier Bond pics than the more recent effects-packed pictures”.

    It is also worth noting that this is not the first time rumours of Campbell directing Bond 21 have emerged. Back in July 2003, Campbell was said to be close to signing for the picture, but was later ruled out for the then-rumoured 2004 shoot when he signed onto The Legend of Zorro.

    Very little is currently known about the next Bond film, as Eon remain tight-lipped as to its current status. Only Judi Dench seems set to return after John Cleese recently revealed that the script’s current incarnation does not utilise the character of ‘Q’.

  6. Dame Judi Dench To Reprise Her Role in Bond 21

    By Tim Roth on 2004-10-22

    Dame Judi Dench, who took over the role of Bond’s boss ‘M’ from Robert Brown in 1995’s GoldenEye, has confirmed that she’s going to reprise her role in Bond 21. Talking to British radio station XFM she said that originally filming was supposed to start in January or February 2005, but "that’s all been delayed now, possibly until the end of next year."

    Dame Judi Dench

    Dame Judi Dench

    Asked about Pierce Brosnan, Dench added: "I don’t know, I would like him to be [James Bond], we started together on Goldeneye and I would like to carry on, I haven’t spoken to him about it. But if he is not, then we can all look forward to having a new James Bond."

    Judith Olivia Dench was born in York, England on 9th December 1934. She is most famous for her roles in The Importance of being Earnest, ChocolatIris and many Shakespeare productions. In 1970 Judi was awarded the Order of the British Empire and was created ‘Dame’ – the counterpart of ‘Sir’ – of the British Empire in 1988. She has won several BAFTA awards and was nominated for an Academy Award in 2002 for her role in Iris. Her husband, Michael Williams, died on 12th January 2001 after a long battle with lung cancer.

    John Cleese will also reprise his role as ‘Q’; he signed a several movies deal back in 2002. It is not known if Samantha Bond, who played Moneypenny in the past four Brosnan films, will return. She has said several times in the past that if Pierce quits she will do as well. No word has been said about Colin Salmon (Robinson) either.

    CBn will keep you informed!

  7. Brosnan Fired From Bond Role!

    By Tim Roth on 2004-10-14

    Pierce Brosnan has confirmed what CBn first reported back in February, that he is not going to return as James Bond. In fact, Brosnan was fired from the role. That’s what the Irish-American actor told Sun Media and the Swedish Afton Bladet.

    “It’s over, it’s over, it’s absolutely over,” Brosnan said this week in Nassau, where he sat with media to promote his latest film, After the Sunset, a heist comedy which slightly parodies his role as a super-secret agent.

    Brosnan said he was willing, even eager, to do a fifth and final Bond, adding that 007 producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael Wilson had asked him to return, although no contracts were signed. "They invited me back right before I went to present that film. They said: ‘We’re so happy with the success, we want you to come back!’ I went on the road as a happy man, you know. I thought we’d get a fifth and no more. That would be it, really. And then one day the phone rang – I was here (in Nassau shooting After the Sunset) – and my agents told me that the goal posts had moved and that they had changed their minds," Brosnan said with a weary tone, with a sigh.

    The now Irish-American actor added that "It’s very hard to find the truth in that town (Hollywood) or in this business at times. But it was their prerogative to change their minds. They can do it!" And they might have done it "to go younger," Brosnan said. "It was disappointing. It was surprising. And I accepted the knowledge (that his run as 007 was over for good) after 24 hours of being in shock."

    On the other hand, Brosnan admitted that he kind of felt that the end was coming. "If you have that thought ruminating in your head – knowing that things are going to change, knowing that you’re going to get older, knowing it only lasts a certain amount of time playing a certain role – then you clearly prepare yourself for what’s down the road, even though you don’t know what’s down the road. But you prepare yourself emotionally. So you know something’s going to be finished, it’s going to be over. And it comes with a great disappointment, but it also comes with a great satisfaction of having achieved the success with it that I had achieved."

    Brosnan claimed he harbours no bitterness. "None, none, none! It’s not worth having. If I did, it would make all the great decade, the four films, the lovely success, meaningless. Bitterness against whom, and for what reason?"

    But he admitted there is some satisfaction in seeing the franchise stumble, with Bond 21 postponed for at least a year. "Go figure!" Brosnan said with a wry grin.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Bond 21.

    Related articles:

  8. Bond 21 Shooting For Spring 2006?

    By The CBn Team on 2004-10-05

    CBn has learned from sources that Eon Productions and MGM are considering a Spring 2006 release date for Bond 21. This follows last week’s news that the original November 2005 release date has been scrapped.

    While it’s unusual for a James Bond film to move away from the Summer or Christmas movie seasons (the traditional time for “event” movies), a late March or early April release would have its benefits. Spring would move Bond 21 well away from such competitors as Mission Impossible III and the next Jason Bourne movie. Eon may even time Bond 21’s release to coincide with the Easter holiday (March 27) and position itself as the only “event” movie for months before the onslaught of Summer blockbusters.

    After Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ grossed over $300 million during the Spring 2004 season, studios may be warming to March and April as a viable time to release movies that were traditionally reserved for Summer or Christmas.

    A Spring ’06 release for Bond 21 also agrees with the rumours of an April ’05 production start date.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Bond 21.

    Related Articles:

  9. Sony to Find '007' Heirs Have a License to Kill

    By Guest writer on 2004-10-04

    It’s easy to name the crown jewel in the thousands of movies Sony Corp. will inherit when it takes control of legendary film studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

    That name is Bond … James Bond.

    For four decades, studio chiefs and movie directors have craved the opportunity to put their imprint on the $1-billion franchise that is Hollywood’s most successful film series ever. Already, months before they officially acquire MGM, Sony’s top movie executives are mulling over ways to refresh the vodka-martini-sipping secret agent.

    The prospective new owners, according to sources familiar with Sony’s thinking, hope to broaden Bond’s appeal beyond older males enamored with the fiery explosions, careening Aston Martins and buxom models. They’re aiming for the kind of global audiences that flocked to Sony’s Spider-Man blockbusters, believing there should be more to Bond’s character than machismo.

    But Sony will soon learn that many a studio executive has been shaken and stirred when pitted against Agent 007’s off-camera bodyguards. Shielding Bond from the minefields of Hollywood pitches are producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, her half brother.

    They are the intensely private and fiercely protective heirs guarding the legacy of their late father, Albert R. “Cubby” Broccoli, a Long Island vegetable farmer-turned-Hollywood showman who almost single-handedly built author Ian Fleming’s secret agent into a global star and pop culture icon.

    “The Sony executives may have stars in their eyes right now as they dream of what James Bond can be now that he’s theirs,” said Lindsay Doran, who headed MGM’s United Artists unit during the making of two Bond films. “But they might get their hearts broken, like so many executives before them, if they look at the deal and realize he’s not theirs, he’s the Broccolis’.”

    The Broccolis possess a unique license to kill ideas they don’t like. Among the casualties: giving Bond a son, exploring his darker side as a paid assassin and even one top actor’s take that the misogynous womanizer is latently homosexual. So protective are Broccoli’s heirs that they once commissioned a confidential 60-page Bond “character bible” that continues to serve as something of an owners’ manual. What kind of woman does 007 seduce? What does he wear? How nasty are the villains he battles?

    “Every decision they make starts with the question: ‘Is this in the tradition of Bond? Is this the right thing for the franchise?’ ” MGM Vice Chairman Chris McGurk said. “They know Bond better than anyone else.”

    No creative decision is made without the blessing of Broccoli’s daughter, Barbara, 44, and stepson Wilson, 62. Their late mother was Broccoli’s third wife, Dana. The two split time between their London production base where Bond is filmed and Los Angeles.

    Working as a team, the producers pore over every script. They decide where in the movie Bond’s signature guitar-twanging theme song plays. They sign off on the director, star, even some of the actors playing minor characters. They are on the set every day of filming, and sit in on editing sessions. Movie trailers, posters and TV spots need their OK.

    “Barbara and Michael have infinitely more to do with it than any studio,” said Roger Spottiswoode, who directed 1997’s Tomorrow Never Dies. “MGM would come up with some new idea and Barbara would say, ‘That’s not right for Bond.’ “

    The producers’ far-reaching creative rights were first granted to Cubby Broccoli when he and a partner forged the Bond production deal in 1961 with United Artists, acquired 20 years later by MGM. Broccoli’s heirs inherited those rights when Cubby died of heart failure in 1996.

    The Broccolis and MGM technically have equal say on creative matters. But, MGM’s McGurk acknowledged, “while everything is equal, they take the lead in all creative choices.”

    Broccoli and Wilson declined to be interviewed, as did Sony executives. But speaking about her father for a documentary included in the Diamonds Are Forever DVD, Barbara Broccoli said: “I remember one time he said to me, ‘You know, the most important thing is don’t let ’em screw it up.’ “

    Lately, Broccoli and Wilson have flexed their muscle on who will next slip into Bond’s tuxedo. The producers nixed actor Pierce Brosnan even though the four films in which he starred were the highest-grossing of the 20-film series. Broccoli and Wilson have let Hollywood agents know they want to replace the 51-year-old Brosnan with a Bond who is 28 to 32 years old.

    “We’ve shared weddings and funerals and the births of children,” Brosnan said. “We’ve had a lot of success together. But as to the fate of the franchise, you have to remember that at the end of the day, it’s the Broccolis’ family business.”

    The producers also postponed the next Bond film, which sources identified as based on Fleming’s novel Casino Royale [NOTE: This was first reported on CBn] until they can find a director and star. That pushes its release from next year into 2006.

    With that film, Sony will begin reaping the riches from Hollywood’s longest-running franchise, which has amassed $3.7 billion in global ticket sales, most from overseas. The last film, 2002’s Die Another Day grossed $430 million worldwide, the most for any Bond installment.

    Since Dr. No‘s debut in 1962, profits have gushed in from virtually all of the Bond films produced by the Broccoli family, regardless of whether Agent 007 was played by such stalwarts as Sean Connery, Roger Moore and Brosnan or the less memorable Timothy Dalton and George Lazenby.

    Each time a new film hits theaters, old Bond movies generate millions of dollars in DVD sales and TV airings. The Broccoli family takes home 20% to 35% of the profit on each film. (Because of murky underlying rights, the only two Bond films not produced by the Broccoli family were Columbia Pictures’ 1967 spoof of Casino Royale and Warner Bros.’ 1983 release Never Say Never Again.)

    The gold Cubby Broccoli struck came amid a chorus of naysayers, including author Fleming, who believed that Bond had limited cinema appeal. But Broccoli was an accomplished salesman of big action movies, having honed his skills early in life hawking caskets and jewelry.

    The son of Italian immigrant farmers, Broccoli moved to Hollywood in the 1930s. Before long, he was making large-scale adventure films for Columbia Pictures and became one of Hollywood’s most colorful impresarios, trucking snow to his Beverly Hills mansion for a Christmas party.

    A fan of Fleming’s books, Broccoli always wanted to make Bond films but didn’t own the rights. A mutual friend introduced him to the man who did, Harry Saltzman, who was broke with 28 days left before his option expired. The two paid a visit to United Artists Chairman Arthur Krim’s Manhattan office.

    Krim was no stranger to the Bond character. The UA chief had been introduced to the spy novels by his friend, President John F. Kennedy, whose enthusiasm for the books helped popularize them.

    Krim adhered to the philosophy of UA dating back to its founding in 1919 by Charlie Chaplin, Douglas Fairbanks, Mark Pickford and director D. W. Griffith. They believed that filmmakers made better creative decisions than executives.

    UA’s then-production chief David Picker was in the room when Broccoli and Saltzman asked for money to bring Bond to the screen. “They came in and said ‘We control James Bond,’ ” said Picker, a Fleming fan who earlier had tried to land the movie rights. “We wouldn’t let them out of the room before we had a deal.”

    Today, that deal has survived as one of the most unique, hands-off studio arrangements ever.

    During the ensuing decades, the Broccoli family has gone through almost as many studio executives as Bond has bikini-clad girlfriends.

    MGM and United Artists have been bought and sold at least a half-dozen times, with new executives bringing new ideas. Director Michael Apted said his 1999 Bond film The World Is Not Enough endured two studio regimes.

    “You’ve got people who constantly want to reinvent the franchise,” Apted said. “That has historically been the source of serious tensions between the ever-changing managements of MGM and the Broccolis.”

    Sometimes those differences reach a boiling point.

    “I remember Barbara shouting at MGM, ‘Don’t tell me how Bond should be. I intend to still be making these Bond films in 10 years, and you may not even be in business,’ ” director Spottiswoode said.

    There is, however, give and take. On Die Another Day, the Broccoli family relented to MGM’s choice of female lead Halle Berry as girlfriend while the studio acquiesced to hiring director Lee Tamahori.

    But the producers compromise only so much. They shot down MGM’s idea for a TV show featuring a young James Bond. For years, they have resisted studio research screenings.

    “When anyone at the studio tries to force anything on them, that’s when they get their backs up,” former MGM distribution chief Larry Gleason said. “In reality, it comes down to MGM financing the movies and the Broccolis having creative control.”

    Still, those who have worked with the producers say they realize Bond needs to appeal to today’s moviegoers, some of whom complain that the films have become too formulaic and predictable. The trick in reworking Bond is not to alienate core fans, who know that Oddjob drove a 1964 Ranchero in Goldfinger.

    One radical departure that might have been sacrilegious to an earlier generation of Bond fans came in 1995’s GoldenEye. Oscar-winning British actress Judi Dench was hired to begin playing his boss, “M.” Earlier films showed the character as a crusty, authoritative man mostly played by the late actor Bernard Lee.

    “Barbara and Michael acknowledge that Bond needs to change as the times change,” said former UA production executive Jeff Kleeman. “But if you’re going to change the classic Bond, you don’t do it accidentally or out of ignorance.”

    As eager as Sony executives are to get their hands on Bond, legal reasons prevent them from contacting the producers until MGM shareholders bless the pending $4.9-billion acquisition by Sony’s investment group later this year.

    But a pilgrimage to the producers’ London headquarters is a top priority for Sony Pictures boss Michael Lynton and movie chief Amy Pascal.

    When they finally capture the secret agent, Spottiswoode has some advice: Back off.

    “Sony is incredibly lucky and would be very well-advised to leave the franchise alone,” Spottiswoode said. “The Broccolis make it work.”

    By Claudia Eller, Times Staff Writer
    © Los Angeles Times

    Related Articles:

  10. Breaking News! Bond 21 on Hold, MGM Confirms No Bond in '05

    By johncox on 2004-09-29

    The industry trade paper Variety is reporting tonight that plans to release Bond 21 in 2005 have been scrapped. MGM has confirmed that the studio and Eon Productions have not yet been able to find a director for 007’s next adventure, nor has an actor has been locked in to play James Bond.

    The five months of negotiations that preceded the sale of MGM to Sony Corp also are said to have affected the development of the film because during that period executives were unable to move forward on the project.

    The studio is now said to be looking to release Bond 21 sometime in 2006 when the MGM label would operate under its new parent Sony Corp. The studio has yet to decide whether the now-postponed Bond pic would be released in summer 2006 or in the franchise’s traditional November berth. Sources familiar with the situation said that the producers plan to meet next month to decide whether to aim for a summer or November release. One factor in setting a date is Paramount’s Mission: Impossible which has a third installment planned for 2006 as well.

    The failure to land a director means a mid-January start date would be tough to meet, making the previously planned Nov. 18, 2005 release a difficult, if not impossible, target to hit. MGM and Eon were cutting things close this time around, and had hoped to tap a helmer by the end of September, but they were not able to close a deal.

    Variety reports the studio was high on several names, including Guy Ritchie’s longtime producing partner Matthew Vaughn (Snatch and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels), who recently made his feature directing debut on the British crime thriller Layer Cake, which Sony Pictures Classics is distribbing. Another was Paul McGuigan, who directed MGM’s most recent release, Wicker Park.

    Those prospective choices would have fit well with the potential direction of the next pic. While producers are keeping under wraps the next pic’s script, by scribes Neal Purvis and Robert Wade, the plot is said to revisit the grittier spy elements of earlier Bond pics, and to stray from the effects-packed entries of late.

    The delay now gives MGM and Eon more time to not only find a director but also to secure an actor to play 007. Variety reports that no offer has yet been made to any actor. Pierce Brosnan, who has said he’d be interested in returning for a fifth outing, hasn’t been approached by the producers.

    Eon is considering introducing a new actor as Bond, but one sticking point could be gross participation. No actor has ever received a percentage of the gross for playing James Bond, which could keep some high-profile names from putting on the spy’s tuxedo.

    Ewan McGregor, Hugh Jackman, Dougray Scott, Orlando Bloom, Clive Owen, Ioan Gruffudd, Eric Bana and Gerard Butler, among others, have reportedly been named candidates at one time. But producers are also considering the option of making the series appeal to younger audiences with a more youthful Bond.

    The movie news site Dark Horizons (who scooped Variety by several hours) has reported that MGM is considering moving their new Pink Panther film starring Steve Martin into Bond 21‘s November release slot.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Bond 21.