CommanderBond.net
  1. French Club Gets 'Royale' Scoop from Campbell

    By johncox on 2005-10-04

    The reliable Club 007 France has scored a major Bond scoop by interviewing Casino Royale director Martin Campbell in Paris. Campbell was in the city for the start of promotion on Legend of Zorro.

    Campbell confirmed that Goran Visnjic, Henry Cavill, Daniel Craig, and Sam Worthington had all screen-tested for the role of James Bond and that the announcement will be made in “less than three weeks.” Campbell also added that Pierce Brosnan, who has recently been touted in the media as being back in contention, will NOT be 007 in the new film.

    Campbell told a ClĂ©ment Cuyer of AlloCine.com that he was searching for a James Bond “between 28 and 32” years of age, confirming reports that Casino Royale will feature a “young” 007.

    Campbell then revealed that he is still looking for an actor to play the main villain, Le Chiffre, and that he is considering French actors for the part. This is the first official confirmation that the villain in Casino Royale will have the same name as in the original Ian Fleming novel.

    The director refuted screenwriter Paul Haggis’ recent comments about how Casino Royale would feature “no gadgets.”

    “There will be some gadgets in the film,” said Campbell.

    Related Articles:

  2. IMDb Confirms Stuart Baird as 'Royale' Editor

    By johncox on 2005-10-02

    Stuart Baird

    Stuart Baird

    IMDb has today confirmed what CBn first reported in July, that high-profile editor Stuart Baird will be the editor of Casino Royale, the twenty-first James Bond film due to start production in January 2006. Baird has just wrapped post-production on the Martin Campbell directed The Legend of Zorro.

    The English-born Baird has edited such blockbusters as the first Christopher Reeve Superman film, Lethal Weapon, Mission: Impossible 2, and Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (for which he also received an executive producer credit). He also directed the last installment of the Star Trek franchise, Star Trek: Nemesis.

    IMDb has also reported that Chris Corbould will join the crew as special effects coordinator. Corbould has handled special effects on all the Bond movies starting with 1985’s A View To A Kill. His most recent film was Batman Begins.

    Eon and Sony are expected to make a decision on who will play 007 this week.

    Keep watching CBn for all the latest news on Casino Royale .

    Related stories:

  3. Tony Christie Writing 'Royale' Theme Song?

    By Matt Weston on 2005-10-02

    According to the Belfast Telegraph, ’70s crooner Tony Christie says he is writing the title track to the next James Bond film, Casino Royale.

    Tony Christie

    Tony Christie

    “So I’m watching all the old Bond films,” Christie said. “My writing partner Peter Callendar and I are getting in the mood for the kind of big ballad that will stir the audience before the action starts.”

    The British-born Christie, whose hits include “Las Vegas”, “I Did What I Did For Maria” and “Is This The Way To Amarillo”, is headed to Belfast in December on-tour. Earlier this year he released a greatest hits album that included four new tracks.

    The report did not indicate whether Christie would also record the title track. Despite the fact his name has been connected with the film’s title song in the past, it must also be noted that Christie may be penning a track for submission to the film’s producers for their consideration. Pulp, Saint Etienne and Swan Lee all submitted tracks for Tomorrow Never Dies, Straw composed a track for The World Is Not Enough, whilst Red Flag crafted one for Die Another Day. All were ultimately vetoed and have since emerged on the web or as B-sides.

    Three-time Bond composer David Arnold is set to return for Casino Royale, however he only co-wrote the title song to The World Is Not Enough (his title track to Tomorrow Never Dies was shifted to the end titles and his end titles track to Die Another Day was never even recorded).

    Stay tuned to CBn for the latest news on Casino Royale.

  4. CBn Reviews 'Moonraker'

    By Devin Zydel on 2005-09-28

    Over the last several months, members of the CBn Forum have been reviewing all the James Bond 007 films in the “Countdown Threads“. If you wish to join in on the forum discussion all you have to do is register. Now here are some selected reviews, varying in opinion, of Moonraker

    ‘Moonraker’ by Turn

    'Moonraker' litho by Jeff Marshall

    ‘Moonraker’ litho by Jeff Marshall

    A lot of people look down their noses at Moonraker. I credit it as the film that made me the hardcore Bond fan I am today. As a kid, I always enjoyed Bond movies, but at age 12 I began losing interest in them to sports and other things, even missing airings on ABC. Then in summer of 1979, I saw Moonraker in the theater and it hooked me. The film isn’t the best, but has a sentimental place.

    The thing about Moonraker is it is made in an era when spectacle was in high gear and Roger Moore was clearly in his element. No, it’s not On Her Majesty’s Secret Service or From Russia With Love, but taken for what it is, a fantasy-tinged epic, it makes for great entertainment if not Fleming.

    When they turned around 360 degrees and made the radical approach with For Your Eyes Only 2 years later, it had the opposite effect, in my opinion and was completely boring. Moonraker is in-your-face spectacle, and if you just sit back and let it go, you have a good time with it. Think about it, was it more natural to have Moore to see Moore raising his eyebrow and wearing gaucho outfits or being forced to act hard and throw out bad fortune cookie lines? I’ll take the former.

    After a fantastic gunbarrel, what follows is one of my favorite teasers in the series. I never saw The Spy Who Loved Me to that point and only heard about the ski stunt, but the freefall made up for it. From there, we are treated to a globe-hopping adventure.

    The scenes on the Drax estate are a lot of fun, right from the approach with Barry’s fine music to Bond’s spying in the lab to the attempt on his life in the centrifuge. The scene where he shoots the sniper (Drax: You missed, Mr. Bond. Sniper falls from the tree, dead. Bond: “Did I”) is one of my favorites in the series and a perfect Moore moment. Corrinne Clery is one of the more attractive sacrificial lambs in the series and her death is very offbeat for the series. I point that and the centrifuge scenes out to anybody who thinks Moonraker is all silly fluff.

    I enjoy the glass factory scene and especially the receptionist. Moonraker has to rank as one of the best films as far as having plentiful babes for Bond and the audience to enjoy; yet another element lost in the current Bond era. Bond’s infiltration of the Drax lab is atmospheric, and the fight with Chang is good fun. And I think the Bondola scene is in good fun also.

    The Rio scenes aren’t as interesting, but still not bad. Same with the rest of the film. Bond in space isn’t the evil element some think.

    Although I don’t enjoy the music as much as some, I am starting to warm to it more as the years go by. It just seems a little too romantic and atmospheric for a film where everything is greatly exaggerated and sometimes goofy. I do rank the title song near, if not at, the bottom of my list.

    Drax is a good villain with some of the best lines of the series. Jaws, well, he’s just there, as is Lois Chiles as Holly Goodhead. And it’s sometimes hard to watch Bernard Lee and know it will be his last as M.

    The film does get bogged down in a lot of humor, but I can take it given the era the film was made and knowing it’s not this too serious tone, the way something like The World Is Not Enough worked. Comparisons to The Spy Who Loved Me may also drag it down, but at the time I first saw Moonraker, I hadn’t seen it, so Moonraker will almost always rank higher for me.

    ‘Moonraker’ by trumanlodge89

    I hate Moonraker. The movie should’ve ended after the title credits. A shameless use of the popularity of Star Wars, a bland villian, a carbon copy of The Spy Who Loved Me, this is one Bond film I won’t watch when it’s on TV. This is the only Bond film I dislike.

    Moore does his job here, nothing more. He brings nothing new to the character, like he seems to in all of the other films he made. He raises an eyebrow, sleeps with a couple girls, saves the world, calls it a day.

    Jaws is out of place here, a poor continuation of the greatest henchman in the series. Drax is given great lines, but he is the most drab and boring villian in the series. He wishes he was as exciting as Elliot Carver.

    Holly Goodhead is Anya Amasova: Part Duex. The only difference is her nationality.

    The space sequence is almost unwatchable. Unlike Star Wars, I really dont get the feeling of being in space. The weightlessness effect is laughable, and there are major continuity issues in the sequence. Where did all the women go in the travel from earth to the space station? And the “video game” ending? It’s just silly. To be honest, the whole movie feels like it was made just so Bond could have sex while floating in the air and Q could say “Looks like he’s attempting re-entry.”

    The music in this movie goes downhill after the titles. I don’t know why, but it just isn’t exciting like other Berry scores. Even the 007 Theme is out of place. It is too slow and melodic or something.

    However, the PTS in this movie is just about as good as you can get. Bond jumps out of a plane without a parachute? And survives? This unbelievable escape is done very well, and makes it seem very possible. If only the rest of the movie was like the teaser.

    ‘Moonraker’ by Hrabb04

    Why bother calling it Moonraker? Aside from Drax and Bond and M, and maybe one or two more, it is a stretch to call it Ian Fleming’s Moonraker. Roger Moore always reminds me of Gil Gerard as Buck Rogers in this movie. And how dumb can this Bond be by repeatedly punching Jaws in the mouth, always hurting his own hand? And does Jaws really have steel balls?

    The action is incredibly lame and unbelievable. The pre-credits fight is ruined by Jaws and the idiotic ending on the circus tent. The gondola chase is cheesy and stupid. It sets the tone for the rest of the movie. This is not Ian Fleming. It isn’t even James Bond. Oh, sure, Roger Moore is playing some guy with that name, but he’s not 007.

    The only thing I like about the movie is the Shirley Bassey theme and the John Barry score, and that is why I have the soundtrack and not the movie.

    ‘Moonraker’ by Bond111

    Often regarded as one of the weakest Bond films, on the contrary I think it’s quite good. Great performances all around, a beautiful setting, and some clever action scenes make this one a favorite of mine. Bond in space is a little farfetched, but it’s not enough to make the film a complete waste.

    ‘Moonraker’ by DLibrasnow

    Another Bond movie with promise that (like Die Another Day) instead seems to lose focus and in turn the audience around halfway through. After a simply excellent precredits sequence and some detective work in California (I love the g-force sequence) the movie moves to Venice and also into slapstick and parody.

    And it gets worse – in Brazil Jaws meets Dolly and )okay its too painful to go on). Suffice to say the movie makers bowed to audience pressure to turn Jaws into a goodie and in doing so eliminated any menace the character had not just in this movie but in its brilliant iconic predecessor The Spy Who Loved Me.

    Indeed this movie seems to be an attempt to remake The Spy Who Loved Me which was in fact a remake of You Only Live Twice. One bright spot this movie does hold is the always enjoyable and watchable Michael Lonsdale as Drax. Lonsdale gives us probably the best villain since Auric Goldfinger with some wonderful lines – Like a lord of the Manor with “May I press you to a cucumber sandwich?” to the classic instruction to Chang, “Look after Mr. Bond, make sure some harm comes to him!”

    When I was very young I loved this movie and hated For Your Eyes Only but as I got older (and wiser) this movie steadily dropped to the bottom of the list, and For Your Eyes Only climbed to the top.

    ‘Moonraker’ by Freemo

    Just for the dialogue, or more specifically, just for Drax’s dialogue:

    “Mr. Bond, you defy all my attempts to plan an amusing death for you.”

    “You appear with the tedious inevitability of an unloved season.”

    “Look after Mr. Bond. See that some harm comes to him.”

    Damn, they don’t make ’em like this anymore.

    ‘Moonraker’ by Scottlee

    Despite being a wholesomnly entertaining Moore adventure, it just misses out on my top ten due to some sloppy filming and over to the top emphasis on comedy. The main problem for me is the cable car sequence. It could and should have turned out to be one of the most dramatic and tension filled ten minutes in Bond history. It turned out, though, to be nothing short of a farce from beginning to end.

    Most of the other stuff is good, most of it. I could nitpick other small things here and there if I had the time, but on the whole this is a better Bond than some people give credit.

    ‘Moonraker’ by Qwerty

    “Where all other Bonds end…this one begins!”

    Moonraker is perhaps the most underrated James Bond film in the series. Often cited as being too humourous, too “out of this world”, filled with too much fantasy and other things like so, I think this is without a doubt one of the best James Bond films in the entire canon.

    This is Roger Moore as James Bond. He looks the part and acts well alongside Bond girl Lois Chiles and villain Michael Lonsdale. While there is alot of comedy in this film compared to some of the others, it doesn’t detract from the story or film itself much at all.

    Hugo Drax has, perhaps, the very best lines of any character in any James Bond film, thanks to some sharp writing by Christopher Wood:

    “Look after Mr. Bond, see that some harm comes to him.”

    “Observe Mr. Bond, your route from this world to the next.”

    “You’re not a sportsman Mr. Bond, why did you break off the encounter with my pet python?”

    “Mr. Bond, you appear with the tedious inevitability of an unloved season.”

    …and many more. He is an excellent villain who has a quiet menace about him. One of the very best in the series.

    Lois Chiles as Holly Goodhead is also sorely underrated. She’s an intelligent Bond girl who doesn’t immediately fall for Bond’s charm, making her very interesting as the film progresses. The scene between Bond and herself in the hotel room is excellent.

    The action sequence between Chang and Bond in the glass museum is also rather amusing.

    Moving on, we come to John Barry’s score. The best, quite simply. Melodic cues in the space scenes, a terrific ‘007’ Theme appearance, a strong theme on the whole running through the film and simply terrific on all fronts. It’s a shame it is not better represented on the official soundtrack.

    Shirley Bassey’s title song is also my personal favorite of the bunch by far. Whether it’s the main theme of the disco end-title, it never ceases to be the best. Furthermore, it’s also matched with my favorite main-title sequence designed by master Maurice Binder in the film. The deep blue backdrops and acrobat women flying throughout are perfect.

    Moonraker seems to have become regarded in a higher fashion lately, and I hope more fans come to enjoy it for the outstanding Bond adventure it is.

  5. Eon/Sony To Make Final Decision On Bond Next Week

    By Evan Willnow on 2005-09-27

    CBn has learned that Sony executives will travel to London next week where they will meet with Eon Productions to make a final decision as to who will play James Bond in Casino Royale, the 21st James Bond film due to start production in January under the direction of Martin Campbell.

    Daniel Craig, Henry Cavill, and Pierce Brosnan are all rumoured to be among the potential 007 finalists, but there is also a distinct possibility that there are other actors—whose names have not leaked to the press—who may stand just as good a chance of landing the part.

    If Eon and Sony do make their decision next week, this does not necessarily guarantee that the announcement will come next week as well. Unless contracts have been negotiated in advance, it still may be some time before fans finally learn the name of the man in silhouette.

    And what will happened should Eon and Sony fail to decide on a new 007 next week?

    According to a CBn source, ‘[if] they can’t agree, all bets are off. Including making their start date.’

    Update (28 September, 2005)

    Variety.com has named what it claims are the final 4 finalists to be decided on next week; Daniel Craig, Henry Cavill, Sam Worthington and Goran Visnjic. The trade paper says the lack of a major star as a contender comes from Eon’s unwillingness to break precedent and pay gross points to a 007 actor.

    Related Articles:

  6. SPOILER: 'Royale' Plot Element Revealed

    By Matt Weston on 2005-09-26

    WARNING: POSSIBLE SPOILER AHEAD

    CBn has learned that the centerpiece card game in Casino Royale — the 21st James Bond film due to start production in January — will not be Baccarat as in the Ian Fleming novel, but will instead be poker. In particular, no-limit Texas Hold’em poker, also known as the “Cadillac of Poker.”

    Like the Baccarat game in the original novel, the poker scene in Casino Royale is expected to be quite lengthy and will play a significant role in the plot.

    Texas Hold’em is a kind of poker in which each player is dealt two cards down — known as “hole” cards — and then five cards are dealt face-up in the center of the table. Each player shares these center or “board” cards to make the best five-card hand from the cards in the hole and the cards on the board.

    Hold’em can be played with as little as two players (going “heads up”), up to a max of eleven players. Regular poker hand ranks apply to this game. According to www.learn-texas-holdem.com, a typical hold’em game goes as follows and is broken down into five categories.

    • Preflop: Starting with the dealer button, each person is dealt one card. Then a second card. Both cards are face down. After everyone receives their pocket/hole cards (the two cards face down just dealt), then betting occurs. Note: the dealer button is a actually a button that says “dealer” on it or “d” that is passed around the table after each hand. It signifies where the dealing is done from.
    • Flop: The dealer turns over three cards in the middle of the table (called “the flop”). These are community cards that each player can use to create the best hand possible out of. Once again betting occurs.
    • Turn: The dealer turns over another card making four community cards. This fourth card is called “the turn” or sometimes “fourth street”. Betting occurs again.
    • River: The dealer turns over the fifth and last community card. This is called “the river” or “fifth street”. Betting occurs for the last time.
    • Showdown: The remaining players in the hand show their cards in order from the person who bet first. Each player uses his two cards, and the five community cards to create the best hand (5 cards total). A player can use any combination so even if one card from his pocket cards and four of the community cards creates the best hand, it is fine. When all five of the cards in the community make the best hand then everyone splits the pot. This is called “the board plays”. Also note that in any time during the game a player can fold and get out of the hand. All bets will be lost at that point.

    Hold’em first caught the public eye as a spectator sport in the United Kingdom with the Late Night Poker TV show in 1999. In 2003, Hold’em exploded in popularity as a spectator sport in the United States when Chris Moneymaker, an amateur player who gained admission to the tournament by winning a series of online tournaments, won the high-stakes World Series of Poker on ESPN. Two additional Hold’em series debuted in 2003, the World Poker Tour and Celebrity Poker Showdown. All three of these shows are still currently in production and garner a large and loyal viewership.

    Casino Royale will not be the first Hollywood movie to feature Texas Hold’em as a major part of its storyline. In 1998, Rounders, starring Matt Damon and Edward Norton, showcased No-Limit Hold’em.

    Casino Royale will be directed by Martin Campbell and will be shot in Prague and the Bahamas for release in late 2006. No decision has yet been made as to who will play James Bond.

    Keep watching CBn for all the latest news on Casino Royale.

    Sources quoted in this article:

    Related Articles:

  7. Sony: It Will "Probably" Be Pierce

    By johncox on 2005-09-22

    Today CBn is able to confirm that Pierce Brosnan is back in the running to play James Bond in Casino Royale, the 21st James Bond film due to start production in January. In fact, a senior Sony executive has told a member of the Casino Royale production team that the new Bond will “probably” be Pierce Brosnan.

    Pierce Brosnan & Daniel Craig

    Spy vs Spy
    Brosnan & Daniel Craig

    Many fans will be delighted to hear this news, but some sources close to the producers find it “impossible to conceive” that Eon will cave to the actor who recently savaged them in the media, nor that they will abandon their carefully crafted “reinvention” of the Bond franchise. As it stands, the Casino Royale screenplay is tailored to introduce a new, younger James Bond on one of his first missions as a double-oh agent. Screenwriter Paul Haggis said as recently as last week that the script he is polishing features a 28-year-old James Bond.

    Also unclear is how director Martin Campbell would react to a Pierce comeback. Pierce and Campbell proved to be a winning combination on GoldenEye in 1995. But Campbell was partially wooed back into the world of 007 with the promise that he would be able to help reinvent that franchise and launch the new Bond. With Pierce back onboard, Casino Royale becomes a much more traditional Bond movie that may hold less appeal for the director.

    A CBn source says Daniel Craig remains Eon’s “preferred” choice for the role, and could still turn out to be the man in gunbarrel. However, the edgy Layer Cake actor may be considered too much of a commercial risk for Sony Pictures. Eon’s attempts to find a convincing twenty-something actor appear to have failed, and with only 12 weeks to go before that start of principle photography, Eon and Campbell may have to abandon their ambitions to reinvent the franchise via Ian Fleming’s first novel and quickly rework it into Pierce Brosnan’s final James Bond film.

    Pierce, who throughout the process has spoken candidly to the media, recently told citybeat’s Steve Ramos, “Until someone like Daniel Craig steps in or until someone like whomever the next man is or until they ask me back the story is still open. For me it’s unfinished business and we might get to stand there again.”

    Related Articles:

  8. Is Craig Close to Becoming 007?

    By johncox on 2005-09-17

    No, Daniel Craig is not James Bond #6. But if the recent seismic activity surrounding his candidacy is to be believed, he might be closer to landing the plum role of Agent 007 in Casino Royale than any other actor.

    Daniel Craig’s candidacy has been one of the more mysterious aspects of the James Bond casting drama. Craig was “announced” as Bond by the worldwide news media in April of this year. Even CNN reported this as fact. But when CBn tried to investigate the Craig question, we were told Craig was not in the running.

    Bond candidate Daniel Craig

    Bond candidate
    Daniel Craig

    Craig later told IGN.com he was offered the part by the studio (then MGM) but not Eon. Recently the Hollywood Reporter claimed that Barbara Broccoli liked Craig, but Michael G. Wilson did not (a CBn source disputes this, suggesting director Martin Campbell is the holdout on Craig, not Wilson).

    Then, early this month, CBn broke the news in its monthly podcast that Daniel Craig was back in the running “in a major way” and would receive a screentest. At the time it was assumed this would be just one of several new screentests in the continued search for the new 007. However, no other names have emerged in this regard except the name of Daniel Craig.

    Yesterday LDWJ Films announced that a “Pinewood insider” told them Daniel Craig was, indeed, the new James Bond. A CBn source in the Bahamas reports that the people associated with the Casino Royale location scout are also saying Craig is the new 007.

    Likewise, the very reliable Stax over at IGN FilmForce reports, “IGN FilmForce has also heard from reliable sources that Craig is the man for the job but have not been able to confirm.” In their report, IGN offers up a picture of Hoagy Carmichael — whom Fleming said was his ideal model of what 007 should look like — noting the similarity in appearance to Daniel Craig.

    Hoagy Carmichael

    Fleming’s Bond:
    Hoagy Carmichael

    Some Bond fans discount Craig’s chances after screenwriter, Paul Haggis, leaked news that the James Bond in Casino Royale will be 28-years-old. Daniel Craig is 37.

    However, in Layer Cake — the film that appears to have brought him to the attention of Eon — Craig successfully plays a 30-year-old. Also, Haggis may be working off a draft written when the Bond search was actively focused on casting a twentysomething Bond.

    The critical aspect of the current Casino Royale storyline seems to be less about age and more about Bond’s first mission as a double-oh agent. Therefore, it is not inconceivable that a man who has already reached the rank of Commander in the Royal Navy, and has logged at least three successful missions as an SIS agent (one must kill three times to become a double-oh), would be in his thirties. In fact, might even be more conceivable.

    Despite all the heat, CBn has not been able to confirm via its most trusted sources that Craig has officially been offered the role of 007. But we have been able to confirm that this latest buzz is not based on unfounded rumour. Craig’s candidacy IS genuine, and, at this moment, people close to the production appear to be holding their collective breath waiting for the next shoe to drop.

    Will that shoe be the official announcement of Daniel Craig as James Bond? Or could it still be Henry Cavill, Alex O’Lachlan, or even Pierce Brosnan? Or will we all be surprised when a complete unknown steps on stage and assumes the role of the world’s greatest secret agent?

    If all the endless speculation hasn’t made you tune out already…

    Stay tuned!

    Related Articles:

  9. Bond Begins With Paul Haggis

    By Matt Weston on 2005-09-16

    Paul Haggis

    Paul Haggis

    With an Oscar nomination under his belt for Clint Eastwood’s Million Dollar Baby, Paul Haggis has become one of the busiest screenwriters in Hollywood. The Hollywood Reporter writes that Haggis is currently busy polishing the script for Casino Royale in his hotel room, whilst attending the Toronto International Film Festival.

    The screenwriter spoke briefly about his work on the upcoming James Bond picture, confirming director Martin Campbell’s comments from February this year, that we will be seeing a cinematic Bond like never before. “It’s going to be good,” Haggis said. “We’re trying to reinvent Bond. He’s 28: no Q, no gadgets.”

    This news should help narrow down the countless names being bandied around for the role of 007. In particular, it seems to rule out the likelihood of the return of 52-year-old Pierce Brosnan, as has been rumoured this week.

    Keep watching CBn for the latest news on Casino Royale.

    Related stories

  10. Bond Bound for Bahamas

    By johncox on 2005-09-13

    Last month CBn reported that the Casino Royale production team were having trouble securing shooting locations in South Africa and the production may be forced to abandon the country and move elsewhere.

    It now appears the Casino team has found their new location: The Bahamas.

    Map of The Bahamas

    Map of The Bahamas

    Director Martin Campbell and Director of Photography Phil Meheux are currently on Paradise Island scouting locations for the 21st James Bond film, which is set to start production in January. However, it’s still not known whether The Bahamas will act as a stand-in for South Africa or will play itself in the film. The Casino Royale screenplay is currently being rewritten by Paul Haggis.

    The Commonwealth of The Bahamas is an archipelago of 700 islands and cays surrounded by coral reefs and extensive sand flats extending from about 50 miles east of Florida and 50 miles northeast of Cuba. There are more than twenty inhabited islands with the main population centre being at the capital, Nassau.

    The Bahamas are hardly a new location for 007. James Bond first visited the islands in 1965’s THUNDERBALL. He returned again in 1989’s Licence To Kill (although in that case Bimini and “Cray Key” were doubled by locations in and around Key West, Florida). Eon has also used The Bahamas to film key underwater sequence for several Bond films, including The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) and For Your Eyes Only (1981). The “unofficial” James Bond film, Never Say Never Again (1983), was also shot and set extensively in The Bahamas.

    The Bahamas have another interesting Bond connection. Former James Bond Sean Connery keeps a home there where he recently recorded his voice track for EA’s upcoming 007 videogame, From Russia With Love.

    In other Casino Royale news, CBn sources could not confirm fresh rumours that Pierce Brosnan is once again being considered for the role of James Bond, although casting the new 007 is clearly becoming a struggle for the Casino Royale team. Said one of the principle decision makers, “It’s damn near impossible.”

    Keep watching CBn for all the latest news on Casino Royale.

    Related Articles: