CommanderBond.net
  1. First Looks Part II: One Man, One Film

    By Guest writer on 2006-03-17

    An Article by Ed Harris

    On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)

    142 minutes, Directed by Peter Hunt, Starring George Lazenby, Diana Rigg and Telly Savalas

    The Film In General

    George Lazenby’s sole effort as Bond is actually quite remarkable when you think about it. The film was a huge risk; the producers were replacing a hugely popular actor with an unknown and untried model who had done some commercial work but no true acting. To the filmmaker’s credit, they do everything in their power to make Lazenby’s debut as spectacular as possible. They had a rather tough road ahead of them as Sean Connery was one of the biggest stars on the planet based solely on the James Bond films. As a result, the public had taken to identifying him as James bond, a difficult situation when he stepped down from the role and another actor had to be found after his departure from the series in 1967. The producers searched high and low for the next James Bond. They found him in an untried model whose only on-camera experience had been a series of commercials. What they ended up with was one of the best films in the series.

    The gun barrel gets us off to a great start and I love the remix of the theme. It has a very cool sound to it that just simply works. Also very nice is the intro of Bond, a neat little reworking of the introduction in Dr. No only this time it’s as he drives down the road. This has the effect of not only giving a solid introduction to the new James bond, but also reassuring the audience that they’re looking at the same character from the previous five films, a strategy that is carried through the main title sequence. First Looks - Part II: On Her Majesty's Secret ServiceLazenby’s reading of the famous intro line is delivered well, though at times his voice has a bit too much of an Australian accent (given that he’s from Australia one really can’t hold that against him). The ensuing fight with Draco’s men after he stops Tracy from committing suicide is one of the best in the film, I especially like the moment where the one goon leaps on him from above and he simply tosses him off like he’s nothing. The line that caps off the teaser is a nice little joke that leads to a very nice main title sequence laced with clips from the previous five films to further drive home the fact that he is Bond.

    The hotel scenes do something very smart, which the rest of the first half of the script does as well, which is to basically follow the source novel pretty closely with a few changes here and there. Diana Rigg’s casting as Tracy is perfect. She has a very nice working chemistry with Lazenby; the relationship evolves slowly and naturally with Rigg playing the part cold enough to make her initial lack of attraction plausible but not so cold that when the falls in love it comes off as merely a plot convenience. Rigg’s chief contribution to the film from a marketing standpoint is her association with her Emma Peel character from the “Avengers” TV series. She gives the film a bit of star power along with Telly Savalas that takes a bit of the edge off the casting of an unknown as Bond.

    Another element of the hotel scenes I enjoy is the employment of a rather sly sense of humor; Bond’s line about knowing “a little about women” is a nice nod to the fourth movie and the film keeps up the slyness for most of the first third of the movie. It works fine with Lazenby’s bond since he needed to be established as Bond, making the references an actual filmmaking tool rather than a gimmick. This wouldn’t have been quite as necessary with someone along the lines of Roger Moore (already known from television) or Michael Caine (maybe the biggest star in England outside of Connery at the time). In fact, with either of those men the sly references would come across as gimmicky and a bit too cutesy for their own good.

    One last element I want to touch on is the wonderful fight with Draco’s man in the hotel room. Like the kitchen fight in The Living Daylights, it’s a short but boisterous bit of action that showcases Lazenby’s toughness and is just sheer fun to watch. Another fun bit comes the next day as Bond is taken to Draco’s place. His casual, utterly nonchalant reaction to Draco’s men is a great humorous touch and his brief scuffle with them outside Draco’s office is decent though the sound effects are just a tad overdone.

    The scene with Draco is very nicely done; it was a smart move to not have Bond show interest in Draco’s proposition concerning Tracy until he hits upon the notion that Draco could help him find Blofeld. George LazenbyGabriele Ferzetti gives a likable performance as the mobster, slightly reminiscent of Pedro Armendariz’s job in From Russia With Love. Lazenby also does a decent job in the scene, listening with casual disinterest until the aforementioned idea comes to him. It’s perfect that James Bond would get involved in a relationship like this for business purposes. It fits the Fleming characterization and the film plays it out smartly, not having Bond truly in love until the absolute last possible moment.

    Lazenby plays the impulsive side of Bond rather well in the scene with M where he resigns. Bernard Lee is wonderfully abrupt and we truly get the sense he’s upset with Bond for not being able to find Blofeld. Lazenby’s byplay with Moneypenny at the start of the scene is nice and subtle and his dictation of his resignation is suitably harsh. The sly humor returns a bit as Bond goes through his desk and the payoff to the scene is a nice moment between Bond and Moneypenny.

    Up next is the only flaw the movie has, though admittedly it’s done well enough and I can’t think of anything better off the top of my head. The development of the Bond/Tracy romance works just fine, it’s well scripted and acted but the romantic montage just seems rather out of place for a Bond film. It works to give us a different side of Bond, but it is overdoing it very slightly. The one saving grace of the montage is that it segues neatly into the best sequence in the entire film; Bond in the lawyer’s office. This is maybe the best blending of Bondian style with Hitchcockian suspense in the series. John Barry does a masterful job building suspense with his music and Peter Hunt’s shot selection combined with razor sharp editing from John Glen makes the scene crackle with an intensity that has been seldom matched in the series since. In a nice touch, the relationship aspect is kept alive with a cutaway to Tracy and Draco as she reveals that she is in love with Bond but Bond is not in love with her. It’s a good moment, and absolutely necessary since she vanishes from the film for the better part of an hour.

    The subsequent scene with M leads us to the Piz Gloria segment of the film. Bond’s brief scene with Sir Hilary Bray takes us to the train station where Bond is picked up by Irma Bunt, played with an amazing level of stern menace by Ilse Steppat, though at times her accent is a bit too thick to understand what she’s saying. Still, a very good job of playing what has since turned into a rather amusing cliché; the unsmiling German villainess. Lazenby’s portrayal of “Bray” is amusing. He looks a little like Peter Sellers and it’s very funny to see Bond playing at being the ultimate bookworm. The humor continues with his introduction to the girls, Lazenby plays it very relaxed and it’s truly amusing to see him just boring the girls to death.

    This brings us to Blofeld. I enjoy Telly Savalas’s take on the character, though it rather odd to he him getting in on the action towards the end of the movie. In a lucky coincidence, there is an unintentional reference to the previous film where Bond put a throwing star into the man’s wrist. Since Savalas has a quite noticeably withered looking index finger, it lends a nice little connection to the last film. That aside, he plays the man with his usual blend of charm and menace, creating a wonderfully low key villain. As it’s been noted before, there are a few flubs within the structure of the scene. They take only a little bit away however and the overall quality of the film more than makes up for them.

    Bond’s escape from his room is a neat little bit of business, inventive and refreshingly low tech. Diana RiggOne of the things I enjoy about the film is the almost total lack of gadgets. In fact, pretty much everything in the film is rather low tech and simple. It’s a nice break from the previous two films where the level of outlandishness was raised about as high as you can go without going too far (a flaw a few of the Moore Bond’s sadly have). His seduction of Ruby is good, though the “chicken therapy” that interrupts the scene is an amusing bit of weirdness that kind of breaks the mood though I see what they were going for. The one thing that saves it from being just really out of place is that it places a little foreshadowing about Blofeld’s plan. Another aspect of this scene is the notion that Bond is being unfaithful to Tracy by sleeping with Ruby. As the last scene with Tracy indicates, and as we will see when Bond escapes from the compound, Bond only falls in love after Tracy saves his life.

    The buildup to Bond’s capture is nicely done with the local agent trying to contact him and being driven away by Blofeld’s guards. Blofeld’s eventual reveal of his plan is well played by Savalas. He downplays it nicely, emphasizing menace over theatricality. The plan is just realistic to be plausible without coming off as overly serious, but also low key enough so that it doesn’t show up the romantic angle (the real story of the film).

    From here, we get maybe the longest extended period of action/suspense in a Bond film. The escape sequence is a real showstopper beginning with Bond escaping from the wheel house and scaling along the cable. It’s a truly scary scene as Bond is nearly crushed several times. From here, we get some sneaking around as Blofeld put his plan into effect. This leads to the terrific ski chase, wonderfully scored by Barry and performed flawlessly by the stunt team and actors. This leads to a very inventive fight in a shed full of bells which I’ve always enjoyed.

    Capping off the escape is the reintroduction of Tracy into the story. Her ensuing rescue, culminating in a gleefully destructive demolition derby (literally) gives Bond a real and honest reason to fall in love with her, which he does. I feel that the reason the film has been overlooked so often is the very thing that makes it such a unique, wonderful entry in the franchise. It inverts the importance of the plotlines. In the typical outing, the main plotline is the usual “megalomaniacal villain with a doomsday weapon” scenario while any romantic angles are left for the secondary plotline. Here though, the action oriented plotline is given a secondary, almost superfluous status and the primary story ends up being the development and tragic end to a romance. The scene in the barn where Bond proposes is well done and nicely written so the proposal comes off as natural rather than forced.

    The following morning ski chase is another well done bit of action with the ensuing avalanche a novel way of ending things. George LazenbyAdmittedly it’s really just a way to get Tracy captured but it works well enough. The following rescue is great, something out of an Alistair MacLean novel with the actual rescue getting done quite quickly, all the better to move us along to the final showdown with Blofeld. There are a few neat touches in it that I really love. Diana Rigg suddenly going into “Emma Peel” mode and fighting with one of Blofeld’s henchmen is a great touch and Bond sliding on his belly firing a machine gun is a great image. I also love the bobsled fight; it gives the audience a really good showdown with Blofeld (that honestly should have been saved for the next film) that has a nice gag at the end.

    The wedding is nicely done with not too much sentiment but enough honest emotion to keep from sounding phony and the sad ending works extremely well. It’s a real gut punch of an ending since unless one has already read the novel beforehand; there is literally no foreshadowing at all. It comes out of the blue and is a real shocker. Lazenby plays it well, showing as much emotion as Bond should show. The Bond Theme playing over the end credits is a nice reassurance for the audience that Bond will be back, despite his loss.

    Lazenby's Perfomance

    In the end, George Lazenby did a remarkably good job considering he had no previous acting experience. Granted he basically does Sean Connery’s Bond for the most part but since he was not really an actor and Connery was the logical person to model oneself after, his choices make sense. He handles the action very well, we always believe he can take out whomever he’s sparring with. He handles what humor there is rather stiffly but honestly, the humor is not really ever associated with him enough to make or break his performance. He gives a very good performance with only his lack of experience holding him back. It’s a shame he bowed out of doing any more, I would have liked to have seen another film or two with him as Bond.

  2. Venice to See 'Royale' Action

    By Evan Willnow on 2006-03-16

    WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD

    In a video interview with MovieFone, Eva Green, who plays Bond Girl Vesper Lynd in Casino Royale, confirmed that the production will be filming in the historic city of Venice, Italy. Venice was first mentioned as a possible shooting location by the French Fan club last year.

    Venice, Italy

    Venice, Italy

    But exactly how much of Casino Royale will be set in the famous ‘floating’ city? Will it simply be a tag at the end of the film like From Russia With Love, or will Venice see the first Bondian action since Roger Moore rolled his gondola across St Marco Square in Moonraker?

    CommanderBond.net can now confirm that Venice will be the site of a major action sequence for the climax of Casino Royale. Some of the action will be filmed throughout the city and on the banks of the Grand Canal, while the bulk will be filmed inside the famous 007 stage at Pinewood Studios. Special effects supervisor Chris Corbould recently told SuperHeroHype that this climatic scene will be his biggest challenge to date.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, the UK and, of course, Venice.

  3. Vesper Revealed: All-New Pics of Craig and His Bond Girls

    By Athena Stamos on 2006-03-14

    The new ‘OO7’ Magazine Online has posted a special “Casino Royale Special Report” today with some fantastic all-new photos of Daniel Craig posing with Bond Girls Eva Green and Caterina Murino. This is our first look at Eva Green in full costume and in action as Vesper Lynd.

    Click the cover image below to read ‘OO7’ Magazine Online’s exclusive Casino Royale Special Report:

    click to go to spcial report'

    Click to go to the Casino Royale Special Report

    Publisher Graham Rye announced last month that ‘OO7’ Magazine #48 will be the last paper issue. From here on out, ‘OO7’ Magazine will be published online. For details on how to subscribe, visit www.007magazine.co.uk.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK.

    *‘OO7’ Magazine is an independent publication no longer affiliated with The James Bond International Fan Club.

    Related articles:

  4. On The Set Of Casino Royale

    By Devin Zydel on 2006-03-14

    Following up the recent reports by Extra TV, Entertainment Tonight, the BBC, and other news sources, comes this new Casino Royale set visit video from Moviefone.

    The video opens up with an interview with new James Bond Daniel Craig talking about the new film and his role. ‘We’re given a bit more sway with it, because we’re telling a story (Casino Royale) from the beginning,’ says Craig. Bond girl Eva Green (Vesper Lynd) is also interviewed, as she throws in her support for the new Bond. Saying that she’ll be shooting her first scenes in a week, Green explains how the character of Vesper is an ‘enigma’ and different from many of the other Bond girls. Catarino Murino, who plays Solonge, also backs the new 007, saying ‘you will be a great Bond… [he’s] not only a lover… he can be very rude.’ Unlike Green, who has yet to begin filming, Murino only has one scene left to be filmed–which entails her riding on the horse she has previously been seen with in shots from the film.

    The video also includes a short scene from the new film between James Bond and Judi Dench’s M in the Bahamas. Additionally, Sebastien Foucan (Mollaka) explains how Parkour, an art of free-running, will be an essential part of his performance in a chase scene, saying, ‘free-running is about composing with a particular environment.’

    Watch the entire set visit video here.

    Stay tuned to CBn for all the latest news and coverage on Casino Royale.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK.

  5. "Craig is the best actor who has ever played James Bond!"

    By Tim Roth on 2006-03-12
    New amazing picture from 'Sonntagszeitung'

    New amazing picture from ‘Sonntagszeitung’

    Swiss newspaper

    Sonntagszeitung
    has published a very long and detailed article on the
    shooting of Casino Royale in the Bahamas containg a lot of interesting tidbits.
    CBn has summarised the most important quotes and facts.
    Spoilers ahead!

    Replying to the critics from ‘craignotbond.com’, director Martin Campbell said:
    "I am convinced that Craig is the best actor who has ever – and I mean
    ever – played James Bond". He added that GoldenEye "was a Bond formula movie,
    but that lead into a dead end. We cannot go and blast away control centres for
    another ten years. We’re going back to the beginning: No CGI, but good old fist
    fights."

    Answering the obligatory Pierce Brosnan question, Campbell said "It’s not
    personal. It has nothing to do with Pierce. But we re-boot the whole franchise.
    We show that Bond will suffer from emotional and physical pain. Honestly, we
    couldn’t do that with Pierce."

    Also, the Swiss paper cleared up a few rumours. Craig has a normal driver’s
    license. He is allowed to and he can drive cars with gear shift. Second unit
    director Alex Witt even says: "We’re kind of afraid of Daniel in a bulldozer,
    because he drives like the devil."  Also, Craig is indeed a little bit
    sun-burned, but he said: "Tell me someone of the cast or crew who isn’t." To
    keep his good shape, Craig goes to the gym for two hours every day after
    wrapping.

    Casting director Debbie McWilliams said that "We did actual screentests with
    five actors." Of course she wouldn’t tell any names, but she added: "Beyond
    Daniel, one English guy, two from Australia and one from former Yugoslavia." As
    CBn revealed
    a while back, those four were Alex O’Lachlan, Goran Visnjic,
    Sam Worthington
    and Henry Cavill.

    Caterina Murino as Solonge

    Caterina Murino as Solonge

    Martin Campbell said that "The last line of the book will be the last line of
    the film. And yes, Eva’s Vesper is going to die". Suicide, as in the book? "We
    won’t tell", Campbell said. "But the beast is going to die anyway". As for the
    other Bond girl, the "Sonntagszeitung" revealed that – as already hinted on the
    production skills from the Bahamas – Caterina Mourino’s Solonge will be a horse
    lover.

    Barbara Broccoli  was also quoted, saying: "We are aware that filming book
    #1 as film #21 doesn’t make any sense. It’s total nonsense. But it’s fun".

    Finally, the paper also has some interesting lines about the gunbarrel: Is
    the new gunbarrel already shot? Craig: "Maybe". Maybe? Craig: "Yes, it is shot. But on the other hand it isn’t. It’ll be a bit of a surprise, so stay tuned".

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK.

  6. Casino Royale 2nd Unit Director: Alexander Witt

    By Devin Zydel on 2006-03-12

    Amongst all the recent Casino Royale news, interviews, and reports, one noteworthy crew addition seems to have been overlooked. As reported by SuperHeroHype, Alexander Witt will be the 2nd unit director for the new 007 film.

    Alexander Witt is a brand new addition to the crew of the James Bond films. A second-unit director, as well as a director of photography, Witt’s past film credits are impressive, and include Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, The Bourne Identity, Hannibal, and many others. The full list can be viewed on his IMDb page.

    The thought of a new 2nd unit director was previously discussed in the CBn forums when Gary Powell was announced as the stunt coordinator, although fans weren’t quite sure who the job would go to. Witt is replacing long-time 007 series veteran Vic Armstrong, who was the 2nd unit director on Die Another Day, The World Is Not Enough, and Tomorrow Never Dies, and also worked on Never Say Never Again, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, and other Bond films. His most recent work (as the stunt coordinator and 2nd unit director) was on the upcoming Mission: Impossible III.

    Stay tuned to CBn for all the latest news and coverage on Casino Royale.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK.

  7. Casino Royale Torture Sequence Set For Last Day Of Shooting

    By Devin Zydel on 2006-03-11

    Possible Spoilers

    One of, and perhaps the most important scene (apart from the introduction of Daniel Craig as James Bond) in Casino Royale will be the torture sequence involving a vulnerable 007, Le Chiffre, and a carpet-beater. When it was previously announced that the standout scene of Ian Fleming’s novel would indeed be featured in the film, fans put forth many ideas and thoughts as to how the scene would be carried out.

    LSE reports that according to new James Bond, Daniel Craig, the sequence will be filmed on the last day of shooting, saying: ‘The scene should feel tough. There’s a definite wow factor. The men will be wincing… though I’m sure some women will be applauding.’ The director of Casino Royale, Martin Campbell also says that some of the shots are ‘horrific,’ making this Bond film one of the darker ones in nature.

    To hear further reports and interviews from Daniel Craig on Casino Royale, check out the Extra TV, Entertainment Tonight, and BBC News 24 videos as well as the SuperHeroHype interview with Craig and Barbara Broccoli.

    Stay tuned to CBn for all the latest news and coverage on Casino Royale.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK.

  8. Entertainment Tonight's Casino Royale Coverage Online

    By Devin Zydel on 2006-03-10

    The set visits and coverage on the newest James Bond film, Casino Royale, continue! Entertainment Tonight was one of the media groups to visit the set and score interviews with Daniel Craig and Bond girls Eva Green and Catarina Murino (Vesper Lynd and Solonge, respectively). Fans can check out the new video here.

    Daniel Craig is the main star of this show, and when asked about the new 007 role, he explains ‘my criteria is to get it right…’ and with Casino Royale being the first of the books, ‘he’s [Bond] got rough edges.’ On the character of Vesper Lynd, Eva Green explains that she is ‘very sexy and has her feet on the ground…’

    Check out the complete interview here.

    Stay tuned to CBn for all the latest news and coverage on Casino Royale.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK.

  9. Daniel Craig and Barbara Broccoli on Casino Royale

    By Devin Zydel on 2006-03-10

    The Casino Royale news truly does not end today. There have been new pictures from the James Bond film, TV features and exclusive looks, and now an interview with new 007, Daniel Craig and producer Barbara Broccoli.

    SuperHeroHype have visited the Bond film’s Bahamas set and scored a new interview with Daniel Craig and Barbara Broccoli. The questions mainly focus on the current legacy of Craig as Bond, from originally considering the role to now. Some of the main factors in pushing Craig to become Bond #6: ‘the script really… and Barbara badgering me,’ says Craig. Barbara Broccoli commented on the hiring of GoldenEye veteran Martin Campbell to direct, press rumours, casting choices and the nature of this new Bond film, saying, ‘even though it’s rougher and more complex, we’re still making a family film.’

    Barbara Broccoli also says that David Arnold is back, but the title song performer (a choice that James Bond fans seem to be watching very carefully now as many of the other roles in the film have been filled) is still to be decided. Noteworthy tidbits include the two questions centering on the next 007 film, Bond 22, on which Broccoli replies that ‘we are [working on it]. We’re already thinking about it. We’re in the early stages. It’s an original story, but it’s going to continue part of what the story is in this film.’ As to whether a remake of early Bond films such as From Russia With Love or Goldfinger is being considered, Broccoli explains that is not the plan…but ‘never say never.’

    Read the full interview here.

    Casino Royale is the 21st James Bond film produced by franchise holders Eon Productions. The MGM/Columbia Pictures production began shooting in January and is due for release worldwide on 17 November 2006. Starring Daniel Craig as James Bond, it is currently being filmed in the Czech Republic, the Bahamas, Italy and the UK. Stay tuned to CBn for all the latest news and coverage on Casino Royale.

  10. Daniel Craig Ate My Hamster

    By @mrpauldunphy on 2006-03-10

    Bandwagon anyone? Go on it’s free.

    Oh, dear Danny Craig, if you’d only have answered the inane questions flung at you like the creamy expostulate lobbed at Clarice Starling by that wrong ‘un next to Hannibal Lecter’s cell in that bit of Silence of the Lambs at the press conference back in October, maybe you’d have been spared the countless catty jibes and unnecessary column inches as long as your reportedly munificent member since then. Maybe.

    The internet has plentiful good sides (free porn, countless sources of information about Murdoch from the A-Team & up-to-the minute cutting-edge as-it-happens ultra-hyphenated NEWS) but surely its main drawback has to be the ease with which the ill-educated, misinformed and ineffably stupid (political extremists, crack-addled, conspiracist mongs and Fiona Cummins from The Mirror) can spread utter dirge to a wider audience than if they just stood on boxes in their respective town squares and oyez’d their tits off.

    I’m all for freedom of speech, as long as it’s among people who have something worthwhile to say.

    “Now, Paul,” you may ejaculate, “I can’t imagine you have much to say of worth, either” and you doubting-faced Thomases may be right, but nob jokes aside, it must be worth more than the unqualified pish that modern entertainment journos feel necessary to write from day to day, let alone on our beloved 007.

    Us fans knew that something went a bit White Star Line the moment newspapers hit the stands come October 15th last year. Craig was dubbed “boring” (!) “ugly” (!!) and blonde (!!!…Oh, hang on…That bit’s a fact) by the red-topped British Tabloids…And the Daily Mail (but no-one listens to what The Mail says, because they used to write glowing editorials about the Nazis; to receive a less-than-positive reception from this august enterprise is probably a good thing. I’d provide a link….But I just don’t like them). The Mirror waded in the pun-pit pen-first by ousting Craig as “Deadly Dull Dan: The Man with the Golden Gum,” and after dubbing Craig “James Bland,” decided to seek out a real person called James Bland to comment on the new inauguration. Oh, how we nearly shat ourselves with the hilarity and high-brow humour. He was knocked for daring to wear a buoyancy-aid while skimming his way to the conference care of the Royal Marines, despite the fact that all the Marines behind him were wearing something shockingly similar. And they were real Marines ‘n’all. Real life ones. Not actors pretending to be Royal Navy Commanders. Real Marines. Trained ones. Real-life, trained Marines. Point laboured enough? Sure the press conference was a bit pap, but still. Real Marines. Actor pretending. Real. Pretend.

    Nothing much happened after that. Until mid-last month when we discovered that Craig had his teeth twunted by a stray fist. Needless to say that The Sunday Mirror was all over it like a rash, and deemed the story so important that it was made a front page spread featuring more killer wordplay: “Daniel Craig is 0w 0w Seven” (personally I thought “Double 0w Seven” would have been more erudite a wisecrack but, hey ho.)

    Oh how the detractors and naysayers guffawed and rubbed their hands in glee. “Casino Royale is being brought to its KNEES!” they probably snarled, “lets go one better and make a website about our hate.” And so the painfully inept craignotbond.com was born. Apparently conceived by “Life-long fans of 007,” it was just the news-scissor that tabloid journos possessing weapons-grade idiocy wanted to use in order to cut the carefully woven blanket of Casino Royale. Many saw this as the mouthpiece of Bond fandom, rabid negativity making us question our very faith in the producers: Aintitcool.com & various decent news outlets saw this as the majority fan reaction when the true majority (I’m talking you and me, my pretty little strawberry) know that it’s just knee-jerk stupidity by those “life-long fans”. Those with any sense will know to reserve judgment until 17th November, maybe occasionally curling a lip, raising an eyebrow or licking the computer screen at the developments as they happen.

    Not even blatant tabloid lies about Craig being afraid of water, or being unable to drive a manual car will shake my unerring feeling that I am unqualified to judge anything until I have seen the film as an artistic whole. And no number of paparazzi snaps, “insider” reports, script reviews or even trailers will have me dressing up in woman’s clothing and parading around Sunset Boulevard, stopping undercover policemen to tell them that Daniel Craig is wrong for Bond. I’ll simply comment “this film looks to be shaping up nicely,” or “hmm….Don’t agree with that, but I’ll wait and see.” I appreciate that Eon are finally trying to do something interesting with the character, but it seems like they’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Babs and Mickey G were criticised for not going out on a limb enough with Die Another Day; sticking to tried and tested principles, but when they dump Brosnan for a relative unknown, vow to rid the audience of all the bloated self-importance of DAD and get someone in to temper the ramblings of Purvis & Wade they get equally slammed. Conversely, they could have gone about some of their duties in the last 18 months with a little more aplomb and tact.

    On the bright side though, it does look like the British Plebsheets are beginning to give our darling agent a bit of a reprieve what with The Sun telling girls to relax about Craig being Bond or something (when it was them getting all spazzed-up about it in the first place). We also now are on the cusp of media outlets being allowed to visit the set of Casino Royale, a move probably initiated to temper all the rubbish that’s been circulating. But as the next few weeks and months may yet hold more surprises and utter eyewash from the keyboards of the inherently lazy entertainment journalist, us fans just know to take it all with a heart disease endangering mountain of the sea’s finest.

    Restarts/rebirths and origin-story worries aside, we -as fans- should now accept the fact that Brozzer won’t be Bond for 2006 and focus on what is shaping up to be the (supposedly, hopefully, seemingly, finally) most artistically interesting and critical Bond film since 1969.


    Saying that though, I don’t agree with Judi Dench as M. That just mucks up the little strands of continuity over the… Oh, what? Ah right… It’ll be explained… It’ll be explained…

    A version of this article can be heard in the 7 March, 2006 CBn podcast.