The Henry Chancellor CBn Interview
Historian Henry Chancellor was the first author to be given unlimited access to the archives of Ian Fleming Publications for a publishing project. After getting a peek inside the vault, Chancellor spent about a year creating a tome that is part biography of Fleming, part biography of Bond.
CBn spoke to him about his new book James Bond The Man and His World, as well his work on Ian Fleming: Bondmaker.
First, can you tell us a little bit about yourself, your interest in Bond and how you came to write this book?
You probably know from the publicity blurb a little bit about me. 
I came to write this book largely as a result of my previous book, Colditz: the definitive history. My publisher mentioned to me that the Fleming Estate were thinking of opening up the Fleming Archive and could I think of a way of turning it into a book. He probably suggested it knowing of my interest in spies, intelligence, etc. So I produced a book proposal and luckily for me they liked it.
What were the benefits and drawbacks of hiring someone primarily known as a World War II historian and documentary producer, rather than a ‘Bondologist’, to write this book?
I never pretended that I was a Bondologist—though now I probably am, whatever that means. 
I am certainly a huge Fleming fan. To write the kind of book I wanted to write I cannot honestly think it would have been of any advantage to be a signed up Bondologist. There seemed no point in trying to replicate John Griswold’s book, or any other book that provides the minutiae that is of interest only to the fan. My book was supposed to be broader and more contextual, and to start at the beginning with a blank sheet of paper was not a bad place to start. Though knowing about the Second World War was quite useful, as so much of Bond was inspired by Fleming’s war years.
Was it difficult switching gears from conventional history, like Colditz, to examining the fictional world Fleming created, where influences and origins may be a lot less clear?
Not at all. Fleming may have written fiction, but 95% of it was based on fact that had been filtered through the prism of his imagination and then polished up a bit. 
Trying to work out where these facts came from and how he used them is part of the process. Obviously it is difficult to pin point the precise way in which his creative juices worked, but my instinct was always to go back to the man himself. Understand Fleming, and you understand Bond.
When word first reached the Bond fan community that your book was coming out, a lot of people wondered how it would be different than Raymond Benson’s James Bond Bedside Companion. Were you conscious of the similarities and what steps did you take to differentiate your work from his?
When I begun I was aware of the pitfalls of this. I had a look at it and then deliberately returned it to the library. Six months later I took it out again, having finished my book, and saw that there were some elements in common; we both had chapters on Fleming, we both had a biographical description of Bond, we both had book synopses—but all of these are pretty much essential elements to a book of this type. Beyond that, there is not much similarity because I am only concerned with the literary creation, and mined the archive to do just that. In fact, I think my book is more like a biography of Fleming, seen through the eyes of his alter ego , 007.
When I helped with the preliminary organization and preservation of the IFP archive in 1994, I was amazed at the depth of correspondence between Ian Fleming and his fans. What was your favorite discovery within the IFP archives?
The letters are fantastic. How interesting it is that Fleming was so attentive to his fans, and was so influenced by them. My favourite letter was from a Berta Ruck in Wales, who was 82, and read James Bond aloud to her husband who was 86 and now blind. Both had been reading thrillers since the 1890s and were absolute Bond fans—so much so that they had to ration themselves to 10 pages a day. Her description of their daily dose of Bond while sitting in front of the fire was hilarious, and Fleming wrote back to say it was the nicest fan letter he had ever received.
How closely did you work with the book’s designer? Were there many images that had to be left out due to space constraints?
The designer has done a fantastic job, and my only contribution to that was to suggest good images from the archive and others—such as pictures of Aleister Crowley that I felt would be useful. I would say that everything from the archive has not been seen before. And inevitably some images had to be left out—not many though.
So much of the world is familiar with James Bond because of the films. What sort of assumptions did you make about your audience’s familiarity with the Bond novels?
None. Or rather some, because there are plenty of people who do not know that James Bond films are based on novels in the first place. So I assumed that they had heard of the novels and probably knew they were written by Ian Fleming.
Did you have a favorite Bond novel before you wrote this book, and did your research alter your appreciation of it?
My favourite book before was From Russia with Love. Afterwards I still like it—even though much of the documentary Russian section at the beginning is complete fiction.
You were a consultant to the recent BBC biography film on Ian Fleming. Can you tell me about that work and what was your opinion of the final product?
I was really there to tell them who I thought Fleming was, what kind of a man he was, and why he wrote James Bond. They did not have time to read all the books, biographies, search the archives etc so I just pointed them in the directions they wanted to go. Whether they succeeded or not I leave that for you to decide.
So Colditz, James Bond, what’s next for Henry Chancellor?
There’s a thread there. Escapers and secret agents. I’ll let you know.
A big thank you to Henry Chancellor for granting this interview, and to Lucy Dixon for facilitating it. James Bond: The Man and His World is now available for purchase at Amazon.co.uk.
adventures have all been celebrated, debated and dissected by critics and Bond fans all over the globe. 52 years later, one wonders, what can Henry Chancellor’s 
Thank you for agreeing to the interview. First, can you tell us a little bit about yourself and how you became a Bond fan?
I am a person who enjoys doing analysis, research, and artwork (primarily, drawing and sculpture) and, for over twenty years, has pursued a career in computer systems design work which also tapped my creative side.
This was done to demonstrate for readers as to how large the stakes had become.
Fleming states that the events involving Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me occurred in October and one of the dates is Friday, October 13th. Friday, October 13th is a day in 1961. Interestingly enough, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service has a flash-forward structure. Fleming had left a space in time for the events involving Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me to fit nicely between mid-September and mid-November 1961.
Contacting people with specific expertise by mail and via the Internet was extremely productive. Their generosity was greatly appreciated, and I gave full credit in the footnotes for the information they provided and listed their names on the Acknowledgements page. I have a separate binder that contains permissions for usage from people who have contributed to the book. For example: The people at the Continental Register helped me to clarify Fleming’s Bentley information, and a Scottish-based film producer and screenplay writer pointed me in the right direction for finally solving the ‘girl in the balloon bet’ mentioned in Moonraker and On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. Akihiko Sato, who is a Japanese scholar, supplied the information concerning the Bar Mecca murder case, which was referenced in Moonraker.
Hopefully, I have provided enough information to inspire readers to delve further into an item of interest. It would be wonderful if an entry in the book sparked a reader’s interest to pursue further research on his or her own.
In the Chapter 21 – Obit: of the original manuscript for You Only Live Twice, I found that Fleming originally stated that Bond entered ‘a branch that was subsequently to become the Ministry of Defence’ at the age of 17 in 1939. He later changed this to ‘1941’. As in the published edition, Bond’s parents are stated as having died in a climbing accident when he was 11. The fact that Fleming first used the year ‘1939’ was intriguing because if one subtracts 17 from 1939, one gets the year 1922. When you add 11 (Bond’s age when his parents died) to 1922, the result is 1933 which is the year Bond ‘bought’ his Bentley mentioned in Casino Royale. Fleming seemed to be hinting as to how Bond actually got his first Bentley, but then changed the year in the manuscript from ‘1939’ to ‘1941’ for another purpose which I touch upon. Using Bond’s November 11th birthday which was assigned by John Pearson, November 11th in the year 1921 (instead of Pearson’s 1920) can be used while still having Bond be 11 years old within the date span of January 1, 1933 to November 10, 1933. Fleming’s changing of the year ‘1939’ to ‘1941’ points to the possible origin of Bond’s fictional secret service: the SOE (Special Operation Executive) which actually existed during World War II. This issue is fully examined in my book.
April’s news has been dominated by 
On April 17, Eon Productions temporarily cleared up a big casting question when they 
If you can’t get enough of 
April saw promotion of two CBn officers to moderating duty, the first was German Bond expert Heiko Bauman who does not have webbed fingers even if he does go by the name Stromberg. A gentleman and a scholar, as well as a great friend, Heiko helped make CBn’s visit to 
Today we watch a Bond film anytime and anywhere we want — in the comfort of our home, on our computers or portable DVD players, even on PDAs. But back in the early 1970s, Bond fans did not have that luxury. If you wanted to recall a Bond quip or relive a tense moment, you had to do so from memory — or you looked it up in John Brosnan’s