 Different Challenges For Daniel Craig's Second Turn As James Bond, Plus: what the future holds for Q and Moneypenny |
  |
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 26 June 2003 From: New York  |
16 May 2008 - 02:51
 Post
#1
|
|
Now on the CBn main page...
   ---------------------ɹooןɟǝɔuɐp ----------------------------------ǝɥʇ oʇ -----------------------------------------dn uo -------------------------------------------------ǝɯoɔ |
|
 
|
|
Lieutenant Group: Crew Enlisted: 22 November 2006 From: Lilly Library |
16 May 2008 - 02:59
Post
#2
|
|
Perhaps Mr. Craig has been reading our Threads on CBn?
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 17 October 2005 From: Sydney, Australia (but from the UK) |
16 May 2008 - 03:19
Post
#3
|
|
Love all his comments here. Also when he says "we may bring these elements in" it just proves how much involvement Daniel has in the movies personally.
--DaveBond21--
Ah, Mr Bond, perhaps you would like to make love to my mistress before I have you killed? Muhhahhh....ha ha ha ha....... |
|
|
|
|
Lt. Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 26 July 2005 |
16 May 2008 - 03:23
Post
#4
|
|
QUOTE(Dell Deaton @ 16 May 2008 - 03:59)  Perhaps Mr. Craig has been reading our Threads on CBn? Well, if he has, he's clearly on the same wavelength as those of us who do want to see Q and Moneypenny brought back into the films at some point. So, it looks like the people who say these two characters have had their day are going to be disappointed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 17 October 2005 From: Sydney, Australia (but from the UK) |
16 May 2008 - 03:53
Post
#5
|
|
I think not having Q and Moneypenny in CR and QoS is a wise choice and breath of fresh air. But I think Craig is actually a fan of the characters and possibly doesn't want to be the only Bond without a Moneypenny or Q scene.
I like his comment that if they do come back, it will be done intelligently. Sounds fine by me.  --DaveBond21--
Ah, Mr Bond, perhaps you would like to make love to my mistress before I have you killed? Muhhahhh....ha ha ha ha....... |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt. Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 4 March 2008 From: Danbury CT |
16 May 2008 - 04:00
Post
#6
|
|
Agreed. They should be brought back intelgently not just "for the sake of having them"
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 9 November 2004 From: Oxford, Michigan |
16 May 2008 - 10:05
Post
#7
|
|
QUOTE(DaveBond21 @ 15 May 2008 - 23:19) Love all his comments here. Also when he says "we may bring these elements in" it just proves how much involvement Daniel has in the movies personally. It does seem that he is involved at a level that is in some ways unprecedented.  But today is the thirteenth... |
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 13 December 2004 From: Buckinghamshire |
16 May 2008 - 10:33
Post
#8
|
|
Could I agree any more with this guy? His attitude to making a Bond film is perfect - the action etc. are important, but equally important is to make them matter by pulling people into the characters and the story. Fantastic.
Q & Moneypenny can return when it makes sense for a story - and as long as they do it intelligently (I take that to mean that they don't just shoe-horn them in for the sake of having them). He may not be the Bond I imagine in my mind, but he's definitely the right guy for the role at this time!  |
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 14 October 2005 From: the bottle to the belly! |
16 May 2008 - 15:11
Post
#9
|
|
Am I the only person here who wants to see Q and Moneypenny return unintelligently?
 |
|
|
|
|
Commander RNR Group: Veterans Reserve Enlisted: 2 March 2003 From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA |
16 May 2008 - 15:13
Post
#10
|
|
QUOTE(Judo chop @ 16 May 2008 - 11:11) Am I the only person here who wants to see Q and Moneypenny return unintelligently? Nope. If liking tradition is "unintelligent" then I'm a moron! 
 "For me, Jack Lord sprung to mind. I mean the shades. And outside of Miles Davis, he was the coolest cat on the planet." - Jeffrey Wright |
|
|
|
|
Sub-Lieutenant Group: Crew Enlisted: 22 November 2002 From: Michigan, USA |
17 May 2008 - 00:55
Post
#11
|
|
Craig may have the most active involvement in the James Bond franchise of any previous actor. It's almost as if he's a third producer on camera, and that's nothing short of fantastic.
 "I arrived soon after you went down..." |
|
|
|
|
Lt. Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 12 February 2004 From: Portland OR |
17 May 2008 - 03:35
Post
#12
|
|
QUOTE(Binyamin @ 16 May 2008 - 17:55) Craig may have the most active involvement in the James Bond franchise of any previous actor. It's almost as if he's a third producer on camera, and that's nothing short of fantastic. I remember someone, I think Tom Mankewicz said that he felt Broccoli and Saltzman should have brought Connery on as an Associate Producer to ensure Connery's loyality - they would not think of it. Maybe Babs has a different view on the situation than her father. I wonder if we may eventually see Craig get an associate producer credit.  |
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10 Jan 2009 - 03:43 |