![]() ![]() |
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 26 June 2003 From: New York |
|
|
Now on the CBn main page...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 14 October 2007 From: North Smithfield, RI, USA |
Post
#2
|
|
Oh, poo; I wish I lived in the UK...
![]() You only live twice:
Once when you're born And once when you look death in the face. --Ian Fleming |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Lieutenant Group: Crew Enlisted: 19 June 2002 From: Des Moines, IA USA |
Post
#3
|
|
I wished I was able to see this too here in the US.
I really had hoped Goldfinger would come to the US theater market, like they did in the UK last year. Darn. Is it possible that this is a new restoration on top of the Lowry / DTS work that was done for the Ultimate Edtion DVD? It would be very cool if they improved the picture even more for a Blu Ray release. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 26 June 2003 From: New York |
Post
#4
|
|
It would be very cool if they improved the picture even more for a Blu Ray release. We'll surely see those for this series sooner or later. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 26 June 2003 From: New York |
Post
#5
|
|
Looks like Michael G. Wilson was on hand to introduce the film:
http://www.nationalmediamuseum.org.uk/biff/news.asp?NewsID=7 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt. Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 30 December 2005 From: Under the sea |
Post
#6
|
|
Apparently, is a total fiasco. Its the same restoration we had on DVD, complete with lots of Edge Enhancement, bad, bad, bad. Someone should burn Lowry digital to the ground, these people have destroyed much of the Bond legacy with their ugly digital transferts.
Check out AICN REVIEW http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35924 QUOTE However, half my mind was also mulling over what I thought of the Digital presentation of the film and it was a mixed bag to be truthful. I can say right away that it was not up to the high standards set by 'Blade Runner'. I have come to the conclusion that Digital Cinema is going to be just as prone to the same quality issues that effect DVD production which makes perfect sense as they are both using similar methods. I was suprised to see some pretty major 'haloing' or edge enhancement effects in some scenes. This was especially noticeable when Bond was in the Egyptian desert. The image was not as clear as 'Blade Runner' with contrast levels being suprisingly low in some scenes and a general lack of sharpness. This could be due to the quality of film originally used or the state of the negative perhaps. Besides the haloing, my second biggest criticism was that motion was not quite as crisp as I would have liked it to be. Panning shots exposed a slight blurring and lack of definition, nothing disasterous but not quite the standard of presentation I had espected. I did get a real kick out of seeing a classic Bond on the big screen however and would definately see more digital projections from the series if they play them. Like the guy who reviewed the screening of the digital projection of 'Goldfinger' said, there was definately a feeling of watching something more akin to DVD than film. Of course, the film is 30 years old so this may explain why the image was not 'stellar' but things like haloing are a little careless, maybe it had something to do with the projector settings but there were no such artifacts in the screening of 'Blade Runner' at the same cinema previously. I'm astounded that Michael G Wilson would fly back from the set of QOS to give the nod to such shoody production value digital screening, did he take a look at the "restoration" ? Apart from the first three Bonds, most of the Lowry digital remasters suffers from unforgivable technical glitches, these people are butchers, and to think we will be stuck with their bad restorations for the next 20 years makes the blood boil. ![]() "MATT DAMON IS JASON BOURNE".
|
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10 Jan 2009 - 00:40 |