![]() ![]() |
|
Commodore RNVR Group: The Admiralty Enlisted: 8 October 2001 From: 38.6902N - 89.9816W |
Post
#1
|
|
With thanks to our friends at BKD:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 31 August 2003 |
Post
#2
|
|
Das war wunderbar!
Herr Sammel hat ausgezeichneten Geschmack im Film (und im Lesematerial Check out the excellent work of BKD on http://bkd-online.de/ Danke Oliver, Wolfgang, Sascha und Heiko. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 26 June 2003 From: New York |
Post
#3
|
|
An excellent interview. Makes one want a fully-loaded Casino Royale DVD with all the missing scenes even more.
He brings up an interesting point about not even getting a name mention--practically no-one in the movie does. Gettler, Valenka, Carlos, Mollaka, Solange (if one doesn't count the kids screaming her name), Steven Obanno, Kratt, Leo, Villiers, etc... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 21 March 2005 |
Post
#4
|
|
A very good interview and a great read. It's a shame that a lot of the scenes mentioned didn't make it into the film, as they could have greatly enhanced the film, IMO.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 2 February 2006 From: England; Untited Kingdom. |
Post
#5
|
|
Brilliant Article. Really interested to hear about the missing scenes. These weren't mentioned in the first draft screenplay
![]() MHARKIN007
"Forgive her, Forgive Yourself!" |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Lieutenant Group: Crew Enlisted: 17 November 2006 |
Post
#6
|
|
Interesting interview. Thanks for posting!
While I wish that we could see more of his character in the film, I think the reason for cutting some of his scenes is for the best. People often get annoyed when scenes or characters are cut from a film, but in most cases this happens for the better. Just because a scene is cut doesn't mean that it's a good one or a needed one, and it doesn't mean that it should be rather "forced" back into the film in some special edition dvd release. Of course, there are many other times when important scenes are cut when they never should have been. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 29 November 2006 From: USA |
Post
#7
|
|
Great reading, Mr. Asterix. Many thanks!
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 21 March 2005 |
Post
#8
|
|
I think that any cut scenes with Gettler would have significantly enhanced the final moments of the film. What really bothered me about the ending of CASINO ROYALE was how the ending of the novel was almost completely discarded. In the novel, Bond begins to see a change in Vesper's behavior, and Gettler pops up a few more times than he does in the film, which really adds to a sense of foreboding that really hangs over the end of the novel. I think that, had one of the two action set pieces at the beginning of the film been completely cut, then more time could have been given to the stalking of Vesper by Gettler in Venice, and that could have really added some tension to the end of the film that really wasn't there.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt. Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 9 January 2007 From: U.S.A. |
Post
#9
|
|
I think that any cut scenes with Gettler would have significantly enhanced the final moments of the film. What really bothered me about the ending of CASINO ROYALE was how the ending of the novel was almost completely discarded. In the novel, Bond begins to see a change in Vesper's behavior, and Gettler pops up a few more times than he does in the film, which really adds to a sense of foreboding that really hangs over the end of the novel. I think that, had one of the two action set pieces at the beginning of the film been completely cut, then more time could have been given to the stalking of Vesper by Gettler in Venice, and that could have really added some tension to the end of the film that really wasn't there. Well, you have a point there. I also would've preferred it if they snipped back the action heavy first act a bit and instead spent more of that time with Bond/Vesper/Gettler in Venice. But, I do understand why they didn't. As I stated on another thread, the Bond moviegoers have come to expect the action, and so when it comes to action vs. dramatic scenes, it makes sense that the action won out, although I still think CR did better with dramatic material than any other film in the series. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 3 December 2002 From: Bristol, TN |
Post
#10
|
|
I actually thought Gettler fit nicely in the last act. We see him once, briefly making direct eye contact with Vesper (how eerie that was!) and then we see her meeting him with the briefcase. While we didn't get his name, I thought his role was edited into a nice, concise character that served his purpose well.
And no, he wasn't *quite* as fleshed out as in the book, but his point was made. Clearly. I dunno, the last act had a great, (I think Harms may have called it...) "Hitchcock-on-steroids" feel that I enjoyed. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 21 March 2005 |
Post
#11
|
|
I think that any cut scenes with Gettler would have significantly enhanced the final moments of the film. What really bothered me about the ending of CASINO ROYALE was how the ending of the novel was almost completely discarded. In the novel, Bond begins to see a change in Vesper's behavior, and Gettler pops up a few more times than he does in the film, which really adds to a sense of foreboding that really hangs over the end of the novel. I think that, had one of the two action set pieces at the beginning of the film been completely cut, then more time could have been given to the stalking of Vesper by Gettler in Venice, and that could have really added some tension to the end of the film that really wasn't there. Well, you have a point there. I also would've preferred it if they snipped back the action heavy first act a bit and instead spent more of that time with Bond/Vesper/Gettler in Venice. But, I do understand why they didn't. As I stated on another thread, the Bond moviegoers have come to expect the action, and so when it comes to action vs. dramatic scenes, it makes sense that the action won out, although I still think CR did better with dramatic material than any other film in the series. One route that they could have gone with it would have been to have Gettler stalking the two of them like in the book, but have it be something similar to the scene where Bond is following Vesper through the back alleys in Venice. They could have cut out the scene with them in the hotel room, and perhaps had them at dinner or something, being watched by Gettler (I think something similar happened in the novel, but it's been a while since I've read it, so please excuse any mistakes on my part). This way, there could have still been the romantic scene between Bond and Vesper, and much of the same dialogue probably could have been said over dinner rather than in the hotel room, but with the ominous threat of Gettler hanging over it all. Either way, though, Richard Sammel was absolutely brilliant as Gettler, even though he was given far too little screentime. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt. Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 9 January 2007 From: U.S.A. |
Post
#12
|
|
I think that any cut scenes with Gettler would have significantly enhanced the final moments of the film. What really bothered me about the ending of CASINO ROYALE was how the ending of the novel was almost completely discarded. In the novel, Bond begins to see a change in Vesper's behavior, and Gettler pops up a few more times than he does in the film, which really adds to a sense of foreboding that really hangs over the end of the novel. I think that, had one of the two action set pieces at the beginning of the film been completely cut, then more time could have been given to the stalking of Vesper by Gettler in Venice, and that could have really added some tension to the end of the film that really wasn't there. Well, you have a point there. I also would've preferred it if they snipped back the action heavy first act a bit and instead spent more of that time with Bond/Vesper/Gettler in Venice. But, I do understand why they didn't. As I stated on another thread, the Bond moviegoers have come to expect the action, and so when it comes to action vs. dramatic scenes, it makes sense that the action won out, although I still think CR did better with dramatic material than any other film in the series. One route that they could have gone with it would have been to have Gettler stalking the two of them like in the book, but have it be something similar to the scene where Bond is following Vesper through the back alleys in Venice. They could have cut out the scene with them in the hotel room, and perhaps had them at dinner or something, being watched by Gettler (I think something similar happened in the novel, but it's been a while since I've read it, so please excuse any mistakes on my part). This way, there could have still been the romantic scene between Bond and Vesper, and much of the same dialogue probably could have been said over dinner rather than in the hotel room, but with the ominous threat of Gettler hanging over it all. Either way, though, Richard Sammel was absolutely brilliant as Gettler, even though he was given far too little screentime. But they already had two scenes with Bond and Vesper talking over dinner so cinematically that might seem a bit repetitive. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Veterans Enlisted: 21 March 2005 |
Post
#13
|
|
I think that any cut scenes with Gettler would have significantly enhanced the final moments of the film. What really bothered me about the ending of CASINO ROYALE was how the ending of the novel was almost completely discarded. In the novel, Bond begins to see a change in Vesper's behavior, and Gettler pops up a few more times than he does in the film, which really adds to a sense of foreboding that really hangs over the end of the novel. I think that, had one of the two action set pieces at the beginning of the film been completely cut, then more time could have been given to the stalking of Vesper by Gettler in Venice, and that could have really added some tension to the end of the film that really wasn't there. Well, you have a point there. I also would've preferred it if they snipped back the action heavy first act a bit and instead spent more of that time with Bond/Vesper/Gettler in Venice. But, I do understand why they didn't. As I stated on another thread, the Bond moviegoers have come to expect the action, and so when it comes to action vs. dramatic scenes, it makes sense that the action won out, although I still think CR did better with dramatic material than any other film in the series. One route that they could have gone with it would have been to have Gettler stalking the two |