IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 'Bond 22' delayed?, 7 November 2008?
Lionheart
Midshipman



Group: Crew
Enlisted: 11 January 2005
From: Trollhättan, Sweden



Now on the CBn main page...



[sub]May release reportedly dropped; back to standard two year break[/sub]


Check out this rather depressing article from SuperheroHype!

QUOTE
Bond 22 Targeting Nov. 7, 2008
Source: The Hollywood Reporter
September 1, 2006

Columbia Pictures has moved James Bond 22 -- the yet-to-be-named film that will be produced after November's Casino Royale -- to Nov. 7, 2008, rather than the original date of May 2, 2008, where it was in competition with Jon Favreau's Iron Man adaptation.

Sony Pictures Entertainment vice chairman Jeff Blake told The Hollywood Reporter that the studio, along with partners MGM and British production company EON Prods., are in talks to bring on a new director after Roger Michell (Notting Hill) bowed out of the project.

The new date also gives the filmmakers the standard two years to complete the next film -- the usual time between Bond movies.

"Eighteen months was a very short window," Blake said. "We're going to stay the course."

Daniel Craig will star as 007 in the 22nd Bond film as well.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Jim
Commander RNVR



Group: Commanding Officers
Enlisted: 2 August 2001
From: Oxfordshire



I fear this will descend into yet more "completely accurate box office impact analysis" / "they are running scared because they have cast a deformed goblin" / "horrendously boring guesswork" very soon.




"There was a violent cruelty, a pathological desire to wound, quite near the surface in the man."
CBn: ...we have people everywhere
Only James Bond is James Bond.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Clopin
Midshipman



Group: Crew
Enlisted: 27 September 2001
From: Frankfurt, Germany



There goes the summer release. Seems they still don't have the script and a new director in place...



"A gentleman is someone who always tries to make sure that the people around him are as comfortable as possible." Adam Webber, BLAST FROM THE PAST
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
triviachamp
Lt. Commander



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 6 September 2005
From: Toronto



Uh oh!
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
pieffra
Sub-Lieutenant



Group: Crew
Enlisted: 3 May 2005
From: Rome, Italy



I think they're afraid to clash with other big blockbusters like IRON MAN, and prefer to have a release date in a quite period.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
marktmurphy
Commander



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 20 June 2002
From: London



Oh well; shame we have to wait a bit longer, but no tragedy I suppose.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
SecretAgentFan
Lt. Commander



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 18 November 2004



QUOTE(Jim @ 1 September 2006 - 07:34) *

I fear this will descend into yet more "completely accurate box office impact analysis" / "horrendously boring guesswork" very soon.


I fear the same, Jim.

... and here I start: My take is, the early summer date was born out of enthusiasm for "CR" and Craig´s Bond. So, SONY wanted to get the second one as early as possible. With Michell on board it seemed to be possible to rush it into the summer of 2008. With Michell gone, it became difficult to find a good director who was free and could go in directly. So, they delayed it. And I´m fine with it. Maybe my hopes are coming true and Campbell will continue - having now a bit more time to cool off and relax.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Bond#9-GeorgeKem...
Sub-Lieutenant



Group: Crew
Enlisted: 21 May 2006
From: Southend, Essex, England



QUOTE(SecretAgentFan @ 1 September 2006 - 10:15) *

QUOTE(Jim @ 1 September 2006 - 07:34) *

I fear this will descend into yet more "completely accurate box office impact analysis" / "horrendously boring guesswork" very soon.


I fear the same, Jim.

... and here I start: My take is, the early summer date was born out of enthusiasm for "CR" and Craig´s Bond. So, SONY wanted to get the second one as early as possible. With Michell on board it seemed to be possible to rush it into the summer of 2008. With Michell gone, it became difficult to find a good director who was free and could go in directly. So, they delayed it. And I´m fine with it. Maybe my hopes are coming true and Campbell will continue - having now a bit more time to cool off and relax.


Think you're right SecretAgentFan, I'm not too worried about this anyway. 2008's a while away and if it comes a few months later, thats alright. I prefer the later releases anyway, it feels more like Bond that way, too me.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
dinovelvet
Commander



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 24 June 2005



QUOTE(SecretAgentFan @ 1 September 2006 - 02:15) *

QUOTE(Jim @ 1 September 2006 - 07:34) *

I fear this will descend into yet more "completely accurate box office impact analysis" / "horrendously boring guesswork" very soon.


I fear the same, Jim.

... and here I start: My take is, the early summer date was born out of enthusiasm for "CR" and Craig´s Bond. So, SONY wanted to get the second one as early as possible. With Michell on board it seemed to be possible to rush it into the summer of 2008. With Michell gone, it became difficult to find a good director who was free and could go in directly. So, they delayed it. And I´m fine with it. Maybe my hopes are coming true and Campbell will continue - having now a bit more time to cool off and relax.


That sounds dead on to me. I assume they announced the May date when THEY assumed they had Michell in the bag and were ready to start pre-production. But now they're just giving themselves extra time to find a director, I think we'd all prefer them to take the time to make a quality product rather than crank it out ASAP. Maybe there IS a certain director they're after who was not previously available but with the new date is now able to do it?
Oh and this obviously means Bond 22 will gross $137.9 million in the US, if the wind blows the right way on the Tuesday before.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Robert Watts
Lieutenant



Group: Crew
Enlisted: 17 April 2005
From: Canberra, Australia



I don't care, it just means 2008 as a whole is the year of Bond, instead of just May wink.gif



'I wanna love you but I better not touch,
I wanna hold you but my senses tell me to stop
I wanna kiss you but I want it too much,
I wanna taste you but your lips are venom.'
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Qwerty
Commander RNVR



Group: Commanding Officers
Enlisted: 26 June 2003
From: New York



I see this is coming from the Hollywood Reporter, but is this actually confirmed?




~ Nobody Knows Me Like You Know Me ~
'People Look Up. Things Fall Down. And When It Rains, It Pours'
Moving at the speed of life, we are bound to collide with each other ♦
D of the CBn Four
♦ ♦ ♦ Are You Ready To Go? ♦ ♦ ♦
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Vauxhall
Commander



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 25 February 2006
From: London, UK



It sounds like quite a reliable piece of information which seems a shame. I imagine that confirmation would come in the form of another press release from EON/Sony. Will be interesting to see what reasons they give officially - doubt they'd admit they're running scared of another movie.
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
Johnboy007
Commander CMG



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 27 August 2003
From: Atlanta



I can't imagine they're scared of "Iron Man"; it will probably be another crappy comic book adaptation that bombs horribly. They probably don't have a director and a finished script and thought this was a better excuse.




RIP Skip Caray (1939-2008)
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post
DLibrasnow
Commander



Group: Veterans
Enlisted: 20 July 2002
From: Washington D.C.. USA



QUOTE(Vauxhall @ 1 September 2006 - 07:24) *

It sounds like quite a reliable piece of information which seems a shame. I imagine that confirmation would come in the form of another press release from EON/Sony. Will be interesting to see what reasons they give officially - doubt they'd admit they're running scared of another movie.



Maybe they are less than enthused with the finished product in Casino Royale and are having to rethink their strategy. That seems the most logical explanation.




Robert Brown was Admiral Hargreaves in TSWLM, OP, AVTAK, TLD and LTK damnit
Enforcer, Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Roger Moore
http://www.jamesbondandbeyond.com/detectiv...dex.php?act=idx
 
Go to the top of the page +Quote Post