![]() ![]() |
|
Sub-Lieutenant Group: Crew Enlisted: 22 March 2001 From: A small town in Lower Saxony |
|
UPDATE (10 October 2005): Mystery solved. UPDATE (4 October 2005) UPDATE (28 August 2005) MAJOR UPDATE (July 6, 2005): Looks like you made a very interesting discovery, Trempo. Today we have the official info.
This post has been edited by zencat: 10 October 2005 - 19:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander GCMG Group: Veterans Reserve. Enlisted: 5 June 2001 From: Lagrimas Negras |
|
|
I'll be darned. Same publisher as the new Beside Companion. Is this another of those many IFP projects? Will Bond be an active character in this? Maybe the Fleming books told from Moneypenny's point of view?
Nice find, Trempo. I'll see if I can get more info from IFP. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander CMG Group: Veterans Enlisted: 13 May 2002 |
|
|
Hmmm.... having branched out into children's books, is IFP now targeting the chick lit/Bridget Jones crowd, I wonder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commander GCMG Group: Veterans Reserve. Enlisted: 5 June 2001 From: Lagrimas Negras |
|
|
Just found this online. Nonfiction? Could this be a sort of Pearson-like Bio of Miss Moneypenny?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 20 January 2005 From: Illinois |
Post
#5
|
|
I don't know... Miss Moneypenny didn't have much of a role in the novel series. Seems rather odd to me. Perhaps this is something about the films?
This post has been edited by K1Bond007: 11 May 2005 - 16:29 ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander GCMG Group: Veterans Reserve. Enlisted: 5 June 2001 From: Lagrimas Negras |
|
|
It's also possible this is not an IFP project...just someone using the name Miss Moneypenny in a metaphorical way. The anonymous bio of an intelligence service secretary maybe? After all, our Bond and Penny didn't work for MI5. And why the title Guardian Angel in the UK?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 20 January 2005 From: Illinois |
Post
#7
|
|
QUOTE(zencat @ 11 May 2005 - 11:34) It's also possible this is not an IFP project...just someone using the name Miss Moneypenny in a metaphorical way. The anonymous bio of an intelligence service secretary maybe? After all, our Bond and Penny didn't work for MI5. And why the title Guardian Angel in the UK? I assumed the MI5 thing to be a typo, but you're probably right. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander RNVR Group: Commanding Officers Enlisted: 18 September 2002 From: USA |
Post
#8
|
|
I think you are right Zencat. I bet they used the title in other countries but renamed it for the UK market so they wouldn't get sued.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Crew Enlisted: 23 December 2002 From: Detroit, home of the Purple Gang |
|
|
There seems to be quite a bit going on, and my wish list over at Amazon.co.uk is getting out of hand. What does a guy have to do to get a straight Bond novel, with no gimmicks, set in the correct time period? Come on, IFP.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander CMG Group: Veterans Enlisted: 13 May 2002 |
|
|
The correct time period being the '50s, the mid- or late- '60s (after "The Man With the Golden Gun" or "Colonel Sun") or the present day, clinkeroo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Crew Enlisted: 23 December 2002 From: Detroit, home of the Purple Gang |
|
|
QUOTE(Loomis @ 11 May 2005 - 13:29) The correct time period being the '50s, the mid- or late- '60s (after "The Man With the Golden Gun" or "Colonel Sun") or the present day, clinkeroo? Loomis, I think we're both strong believers in this one. Bond belongs in his own environment; 50's to late 60's all the way. If we go with Fleming, Bond had three or so missions a year of the type he liked. That would leave a large palette to paint with. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander CMG Group: Veterans Enlisted: 13 May 2002 |
|
|
QUOTE(clinkeroo @ 11 May 2005 - 18:37) QUOTE(Loomis @ 11 May 2005 - 13:29) The correct time period being the '50s, the mid- or late- '60s (after "The Man With the Golden Gun" or "Colonel Sun") or the present day, clinkeroo? Loomis, I think we're both strong believers in this one. Bond belongs in his own environment; 50's to late 60's all the way. If we go with Fleming, Bond had three or so missions a year of the type he liked. That would leave a large palette to paint with. Agreed. I just wondered whether you were calling for more Bond novels set in today's world, since I believe you like the Bensons, and maybe you were disappointed by "SilverFin". |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander Group: Crew Enlisted: 23 December 2002 From: Detroit, home of the Purple Gang |
|
|
QUOTE(Loomis @ 11 May 2005 - 13:42) Agreed. I just wondered whether you were calling for more Bond novels set in today's world, since I believe you like the Bensons, and maybe you were disappointed by "SilverFin". Yes, I did like the Benson's, and I was somewhat disappointed in Silverfin, but not due to setting issues. I liked Benson because of his pacing, his plotting, and his spot on portrayals of the set characters (excluding Marc-Ange). Silverfin disappointed me due to issues that Higson couldn't control (those being the fruits of a flawed concept). Bond, even as a child, would not be an appropriate character for children's novels. Higson did an admirable job of walking the line, making the story and characters as edgy as possible, but at the end of the day, it just isn't Bond without booze, broads, and heaps of death. I'm not much for gimmicky approaches to classic characters, unless executed by the character's creator. I didn't like Pearson's "Biography," I didn't like the movie-related aspects of Benson's work, and I don't like the idea of a youthful, blanched and bland Bond going on Harry Potter-esque school days adventures no matter how many copies they sell. The concept of a Pearson-style Moneypenny version of Bridget Jones sends chills down what's left of my spine. I'll give anything Bond a chance, though, so I'll fork over the cash and hope for the best. This post has been edited by clinkeroo: 12 May 2005 - 04:15 ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|